0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1K views4 pages

Outage Probability in Rayleigh Fading Channel

The document provides solutions to 4 questions regarding wireless channel modeling and analysis. Question 1 solves for the transmit power required to achieve a minimum received power within a cell of given radius operating at 900MHz and 5GHz frequencies. Question 2 estimates the path loss exponent from empirical measurements and calculates received power using the simplified path loss model. Question 3 calculates the outage probability of a Rayleigh fading channel where received power falls below a threshold. Question 4 discusses estimating coherence time and bandwidth from channel parameters and how angular spread impacts these values between scattering environments.

Uploaded by

Charles Wang
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1K views4 pages

Outage Probability in Rayleigh Fading Channel

The document provides solutions to 4 questions regarding wireless channel modeling and analysis. Question 1 solves for the transmit power required to achieve a minimum received power within a cell of given radius operating at 900MHz and 5GHz frequencies. Question 2 estimates the path loss exponent from empirical measurements and calculates received power using the simplified path loss model. Question 3 calculates the outage probability of a Rayleigh fading channel where received power falls below a threshold. Question 4 discusses estimating coherence time and bandwidth from channel parameters and how angular spread impacts these values between scattering environments.

Uploaded by

Charles Wang
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Introduction and Question 1
  • Home Work
  • Question 2

1

Tutorial 2 – Wireless Channel

Question 1
Consider an indoor wireless LAN with fc = 900MHz, cells of radius 10m, and nondirectional antennas
with Gl = 1. Under the free-space path loss model, what transmit power is required at the access point
such that all terminals within the cell receive a minimum power of 10µW. How does this change if the
system frequency is 5GHz?
Solution
The key to solve this question is to find the transmit power such that the terminals at the cell boundary
receive the minimum required power. The required transmit power can be expressed as
µ ¶2
4πd
Pt = Pr √ . (1)
Gl λ
We note that Gl = 1 for nondirectional antennas. We further note that λ = fcc = 0.33m, d = 10m, and
Pr = 10µW. Substituting these parameters to (1), we obtain Pt = 1.45W = 1.61dBW. Here, it is recalled
that P Watts equals 10 log10 [P ]dBW, dB relative to one Watt, and 10 log10 [P/0.001]dBm, dB relative to
one milliwatt.
For fc = 5GHz, we update λ = 0.06m and then calculate Pt as Pt = 43.86W = 16.42dBW.

Question 2
Consider the set of empirical measurements of Pr /Pt given in the table below for an indoor system at
900MHz.
Distance from Transmitter M = Pr /Pt
10 m −70 dB
20 m −75 dB
50 m −90 dB
100 m −110 dB
300 m −125 dB
a) Find the path loss exponent n that minimizes the MSE between the simplified model given by Pr dBm =
Pt dBm + K dB − 10n log10 (d/d0 ) and the empirical dB power measurements. Assume that d0 = 1m
λ
and K is determined from the free space path gain formula at this d0 given by K dB = 20 log10 4πd 0
.
b) Find the received power at 150m for the simplified path loss model with this path loss exponent and
a transmit power of 1mW (0dBm).
Solution
a) We first set up the MMSE error equation for the dB power measurements as
5
X
F (n) = [Mms (di ) − Mmd (di )]2 , (2)
i=1

where Mms (di ) is the path loss measurement shown in the above table and Mmd (di ) is the path loss given
by K − 10n log10 (d). Using the free space path loss formula, we obtain K = 20 log10 0.33

= −31.54 dB.
2

Therefore, we obtain F (n) as


F (n) = [−70 − 31.54 + 10n]2 + [−75 − 31.54 + 13.01n]2 + [−90 − 31.54 + 16.99n]2
+ [−110 − 31.54 + 20n]2 + [−125 − 31.54 + 24.77n]2
=21676.3 − 11654.9n + 1571.47n2 . (3)
Differentiating F (n) relative to n and setting it to zero yields n = 3.71.
b) To find the received power at 150 m under the simplified path loss model with K = −31.54 dB,
n = 3.71, and Pt = 0 dBm, we have
Pr dBm =Pt dBm + K dB − 10n log10 (d/d0 )
=0 − 31.54 − 3.71 log10 (150) = −112.27 dBm. (4)
Reminder: This question is Example 2.3 in Goldsmith’s book. Please check Examples 2.4 and 2.5 for the
effects of shadowing and the calculation of outage probability.
Question 3
Consider a channel with Rayleigh fading and average received power Pr = 20 dBm. Find the outage
probability that the received power is below 10 dBm.
Solution
We first convert Pr = 20 dBm = 100 mW.
We then calculate the outage probability under the threshold 10 dBm = 10 mW as
Z 10
¡ 2 ¢ 1 −x
Pout Z ≤ 10 = e 100 dx = 0.095. (5)
0 100
Question 4
A mobile receiver is moving at a speed v and is receiving signals arriving along two reflected paths which
make angles θ1 and θ2 with the direction of motion. The transmitted signal is a sinusoid at frequency f .
a) Is the above information enough for estimating (i) the coherence time Tc ; (ii) the coherence bandwidth
Wc ? If so, express them in terms of the given parameters. If not, specify what additional information
would be needed.
b) Consider an environment in which there are reflectors and scatterers in all directions from the receiver
and an environment in which they are clustered within a small angular range. Using part a), explain how
the channel would differ in these two environments.
Solution
a) With the given information, we are able to compute the Doppler spread as
fv
Ds = |f1 − f2 | = |cos θ1 − cos θ2 | . (6)
c
Based on this, the coherence time is computed as
1 c
Tc = = . (7)
4Ds 4f v |cos θ1 − cos θ2 |
However, there is not enough information to compute the coherence bandwidth, since it depends on the
delay spread which is not given. We need to know the difference in path length to compute the delay
spread Td and use it to compute the coherence bandwidth Wc .
b) From part a) we see that a larger angular range results in larger delay spread and smaller coherence
time. As such, in the richly scattered environment, the channel would show a smaller coherence time than
in the environment where the reflectors are clustered in a small angular range.
3

Home Work
Requirements
1. Write down your full name, student number, and signature.
2. Detail the steps of your analysis/calculations/solutions. A single answer without derivations or expla-
nations is not acceptable.
3. Hand in a hard copy in the following class.

Question 1
The following table lists a set of empirical path loss measurements.
Distance from Transmitter M = Pr /Pt
5m −60 dB
25 m −80 dB
65 m −105 dB
110 m −115 dB
400 m −135 dB
1000 m −150 dB
a) Find the parameters of a simplified path loss model plus log normal shadowing that best fit this data.
b) Find the path loss at 2 Km based on this model.
c) Find the outage probability at a distance d assuming the received power at d due to path loss alone is
10 dB above the required power for non-outage.

Question 2
Let us consider two Nakagami-m fading channels, both with average received power Pr = 30 dBm. The
Nakagami-m fading parameter of the first channel is 2, and the Nakagami-m fading parameter of the
second channel is 4. Calculate the outage probabilities that the received power is below 15 dBm in these
two channels. Compare the obtained outage probabilities and justify which channel represents a better
propagation environment for wireless communication.
Tips: The PDF of a Nakagami-m fading variable is given by
mm m−1 − mx
fx (x) = x e Pr , (8)
Prm Γ(m)
where Γ(m) = (m − 1)! is the gamma function.
4

Question 3
Consider the propagation model as depicted in Fig. 1 where there is a reflected path from the ground
plane between the transmit antenna and the receive antenna. The ground distance between the transmit
antenna and the receive antenna is r.

Fig. 1. Illustration of a direct path and a reflected path off a ground plane.

a) Let r1 be the direct path length and r2 be the reflected path length (the path length from the transmit
antenna to the ground plane plus the path length from the ground plane to the receive antenna). Prove
that r2 − r1 is asymptotically equal to b/r and find the value of ¡√ the constant ¢b.
√ x
Tips: Recall that for x small, 1 + x ≈ 1 + 2 in the sense that 1 + x − 1 x → 1/2 as x → 0.
b) Assume that the received waveform at the receive antenna is given by
£ ¤ £ ¤
α cos 2π f t − f cr1 α cos 2π f t − f cr2
Er (f, t) = − .
r1 r2
Approximate the denominator r2 by r1 in the above equation and prove that Er ≈ β/r2 for r−1 much
smaller than c/f . Find the value of β.
c) Explain why this asymptotic expression remains valid without first approximating the denominator r2
by r1 in the above equation.

Common questions

Powered by AI

To predict coherence bandwidth, knowledge of the delay spread is essential, as it quantifies the time dispersion due to multipath effects. Coherence bandwidth indicates the frequency range over which the channel can be considered flat, critical for ensuring high-quality signal reproduction and minimizing intersymbol interference in broadband communications, which determines the channel's capacity to effectively transmit diverse signal types .

The outage probability in a Rayleigh fading channel is the probability that the received power falls below a certain threshold. Given an average received power of 20 dBm and a threshold of 10 dBm, the computed outage probability is 0.095. This signifies the likelihood that signal fluctuations due to fading will cause the received power to drop below the threshold, affecting communication reliability .

The Nakagami-m fading parameter, m, reflects the severity of fading in a channel. A higher m reduces fading severity. For the first channel with m=2, the outage probability for receiving power below 15 dBm is higher compared to the second channel with m=4. Therefore, the second channel presents a better propagation environment indicating that as m increases, the channel experiences more reliable communication with lesser variability in signal strength .

Shadowing effects introduce random variations in path loss measurements due to obstacles causing additional attenuation. These effects increase the variability in path loss predictions, necessitating statistical models like log-normal shadowing to accurately predict signal strength in real-world environments. Incorporating shadowing improves model fidelity, providing critical insights for reliable wireless system design and deployment in urban areas .

The change in frequency affects the wavelength, which is inversely related to frequency. For 900MHz, the wavelength λ is 0.33m, resulting in a required transmit power Pt of 1.45W. For 5GHz, the wavelength reduces to 0.06m, increasing the necessary transmit power to 43.86W to maintain the same minimum received power at the cell boundary due to the increased path loss at higher frequencies .

The path loss exponent n is calculated by minimizing the mean square error between the simplified path loss model and empirical measurements. In the context of the problem, the calculated exponent n is 3.71, indicating how power attenuates with distance. A path loss exponent of 3.71 suggests significant signal degradation over distance, typical in complex environments like indoors where multiple factors such as walls and furniture affect signal propagation .

Considering both paths is essential to capture constructive and destructive interference phenomena, crucial for accurate signal power predictions. By approximating r2 (reflected path) to r1 (direct path), the analysis treats the variation as small, simplifying calculations while maintaining effective predictive power. This simplification helps in efficiently designing receivers and antennas without significant loss of accuracy at small path differences .

In ground-reflected scenarios, the difference in path length causes phase differences between the direct and reflected signals, influencing the resultant signal's amplitude at the receiver. This effect is mathematically represented by the asymptotic relationship r2 - r1 ≈ b/r, where b affects the interference pattern of the reflected and direct paths, crucial for understanding signal enhancement or cancellation due to constructive or destructive interference .

A large angular range results in greater delay spread and thus a smaller coherence time due to more significant variations in path length and multipath effects. Conversely, environments with clustered angles have smaller delay spreads, leading to a larger coherence time. Therefore, richly scattered environments exhibit lower channel stability over time compared to environments with limited scattering angles, imposing design challenges for time-sensitive communication systems .

Coherence time can be calculated with available information like Doppler spread, which depends on the speed of the receiver and the angle of arrival of the signal. However, coherence bandwidth requires knowledge of the delay spread, which indicates the multipath-induced spread of the signal in time. Thus, without delay spread data, coherence bandwidth cannot be computed. This distinction highlights the complexity of fully characterizing channel dynamics, which affects both signal stability over time and frequency .

You might also like