Scribd
Upload
48 views2 pages

Social Justice Project Grading Criteria

This document outlines the marking criteria for a group project and presentation for a social work course. It will be marked out of 40% total. There are four criteria: source and relevance of data (10%), concepts and analysis (15%), organization of presentation and project (10%), and teamwork (5%). Each criterion has descriptors to guide scoring as excellent, good, satisfactory, or poor based on defined elements such as sufficient and relevant sources, adoption of appropriate theories, logical organization, and fair division of duties between team members. Scores for each criterion are provided with a total score at the end.

Uploaded by

chanchunsumbrian
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
48 views2 pages

Social Justice Project Grading Criteria

This document outlines the marking criteria for a group project and presentation for a social work course. It will be marked out of 40% total. There are four criteria: source and relevance of data (10%), concepts and analysis (15%), organization of presentation and project (10%), and teamwork (5%). Each criterion has descriptors to guide scoring as excellent, good, satisfactory, or poor based on defined elements such as sufficient and relevant sources, adoption of appropriate theories, logical organization, and fair division of duties between team members. Scores for each criterion are provided with a total score at the end.

Uploaded by

chanchunsumbrian
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

(Emay)

Hong Kong Baptist University


Department of Social Work
SOPY 3035 Social Justice and Social Movements
Group Project and Presentation Marking Criteria (40%)

Student Name: Student No.:


_______________________
_______________________
_______________________

_____________________ _______________________
_____________________ _______________________

Criteria Max Score Your


Score
Source and relevance of the data (10%)
 Sufficient sources of data, evidence and examples to support the topic. All Excellent
Information is relevant to the logic of the topic. Disregards all of the information (9-10)
that is irrelevant. All information is also factual and correct.
 Good source of data, evidence and examples to support the topic. Most of the Good
information is relevant but some is irrelevant. Most of the information is factual (6-8)
and correct.
 Minimal source of data, evidence and examples to support the topic. Quite a large Marginal
amount of the information is irrelevant or overlapping. Some of the information is (3-5)
incorrect.
 Almost with no data to support the opinion. Most of the information is irrelevant Poor
and incorrect. (0-2)
Concepts and analysis (15%)
 Excellent adoption of theories and concepts to discuss the topic. The argument is Excellent
well constructed and explained with logical illustration. Very good insight (13-15)
produced.
 Able to adopt some appropriate theories and concepts to discuss the topic. Good
Relatively clear argument is constructed though may not have substantially (9-12)
explained and discussed. Some good insight produced.
 Attempt to adopt some theories and concepts though not too relevant or clearly Satisfactory (5-
explained. Try to have a clear focus of discussion and argument though the content 8)
is largely descriptive. Only little insight produced.
 Attempt to adopt theories and concepts but not very successful or appropriate or . Poor
No clear focus of discussion and argument. Only some descriptive content used. (0-4)
Poor or no insight.

Organisation of the presentation and project (10%)


 The information is well organized with a logical structure appropriate to the topic. Excellent
Very good use of headings and sub-headings. (7-10)
 The information is organized but there is room for improvement with the logical Satisfactory (4-
sequence. And the arrangement may lack of coherence. 6)
 Organization is not so good. Lack of logic and coherence. Poor
(0-3)
Teamwork (5%)

1
Last updated in Nov 2017
(Emay)

 Shows a great work of team effort with good cooperation and division of the duties. Excellent
All team members are actively involved in the presentation. (4-5)
 The cooperation is fair. Some of the duties are not fairly divided. Some members Satisfactory (2-
may not equally be so actively involved in the presentation. 3)
 Cannot show a team work effort, and the duties are poorly divided. Some members Poor
are just minimally involved in the presentation. (0-1)

Total Score: ______________ (Out of 40%)

Further comments (if needed):_________________________________________________________________________

Signature of Lecturer: Date:

2
Last updated in Nov 2017

You might also like