RUBRICS FOR RESEARCH PROPOSAL

SECTION:

NAME OF RESEARCHERS: Individual Score: (25 points)

1. _________________________________ __________________

2. _________________________________ __________________

3. _________________________________ __________________

4. _________________________________ __________________

5. _________________________________ __________________

6. _________________________________ __________________

RESEARCH TOPIC/PROBLEM PROPOSAL

Evaluation Criteria PTS GROUP SCORE REMARKS/COMMENTS
SUGGESTIONS
10

10

10

10

10

TOTAL POINTS 50

___________________________________________
Signature Over Printed Name of the Panel/Date
 Excellent (9-10 Unsatisfactory (2-0
Good (8-7 points) Fair (6-5 points) Poor (4-3 points)
Criteria points) points)
The chapter The chapter shows
demonstrates a The chapter shows The chapter a limited
thorough a good demonstrates some understanding of
understanding of understanding of understanding of the research topic, The chapter lacks
the research topic, the research topic, the research topic, the literature understanding of
presents a clear and includes a but the literature review is poorly the research topic,
well-structured coherent literature review is somewhat structured or the literature
literature review, review, and disorganized, and irrelevant, and the review is absent or
and effectively adequately the discussion of research questions irrelevant, and the
addresses the addresses the research questions and objectives are research questions
research questions research questions and objectives lacks not adequately and objectives are
Content and objectives. and objectives. depth. addressed. not addressed.
The chapter
provides a The chapter The chapter The chapter
comprehensive and provides a clear provides a basic provides an The chapter does
well-justified explanation of the explanation of the incomplete or not provide an
explanation of the research research unclear explanation appropriate
research methodology, methodology but of the research explanation of the
methodology, including lacks some methodology, with research
including detailed descriptions of necessary details significant gaps in methodology,
descriptions of data data collection regarding data the description of lacking details on
collection methods, methods, sample collection methods, data collection data collection
sample selection, selection, and data sample selection, or methods, sample methods, sample
and data analysis analysis data analysis selection, or data selection, and data
Methodology techniques. techniques. techniques. analysis techniques. analysis techniques.
The chapter is
The chapter is well- The chapter is adequately written
written, clear, and generally well- and generally clear, The chapter has The chapter is
concise, with written and clear, but may contain significant issues poorly written and
appropriate with mostly some language with writing clarity unclear, with
language use and appropriate issues or and organization, numerous language
effective language use and a organizational with frequent errors and a lack of
organization. The coherent inconsistencies that language errors and organizational
writing style engages organization. The affect the flow. The lack of coherence. structure. The
the reader and writing style is writing style lacks The writing style writing style is
maintains a engaging but may consistent lacks engagement unengaging and
Clarity and consistent tone lack consistency in engagement with and consistent lacks any consistent
Style throughout. tone. the reader. tone. tone.
Overall The chapter is well- The chapter is The chapter is The chapter lacks The chapter is
 Excellent (9-10 Unsatisfactory (2-0
Good (8-7 points) Fair (6-5 points) Poor (4-3 points)
Criteria points) points)
somewhat
disorganized or poorly structured
structured, properly adequately improperly proper structure and formatted,
formatted, and structured and formatted, with and formatting, with consistent
visually appealing, formatted, with occasional with frequent inaccuracies in
with accurate mostly accurate inaccuracies in inaccuracies in citations and an
citations and a citations and a citations and an citations and an incomplete or
comprehensive satisfactory incomplete inadequate missing reference
Presentation reference list. reference list. reference list. reference list. list.
 PRESENTATION CRITERIA
EVALUATION CRITERIA
EXEMPLARY ACCOMPLISHED POOR TOTAL
CONTENT Content is clear and The content provides The content is vague conveying
concise and deals with persuasive information the point of view and does
important issues in the and is accurate. create a strong sense of
field of study. purpose.
Information is accurate.
ORGANIZATION Presents information in Presents information in Audience has difficulty
logical and interesting logical sequence which following the presentation
sequence which audience audience can follow. because students jump around
can follow different topics
KNOWLEDGE Demonstrates full Answer all questions but Students were not sure about
knowledge by answering failed to elaborate. the information and very
all questions with limited answers were given.
concrete evidence.
POWERPOINT Graphics explain and Graphics relate to the Uses graphics that rarely
SLIDES reinforce screen text. text and are readable support text and presentation.
Graphics are clear and with minor misspellings Texts are difficult to read and
easy to follow. No and grammatical errors. understand.
misspellings or Texts are readable.
grammatical errors. Texts
are readable.

INDIVIDUAL SCORE
EXCELLENT FAIR POOR TOTAL
4– 5 points 2 – 3 points 0 – 1 point
Subject Student demonstrates full Student is at ease with Student does not have
Knowledge knowledge (more than expected answers to all grasp of information;
required) by answering all questions but fails to student cannot answer
class questions with elaborate. questions about subject.
explanations and
elaboration.
Organization Student presents Student presents Panel/audience cannot
information in logical, information in logical understand presentation
interesting sequence which sequence which audience because there is no
audience can follow. can follow. sequence of information.
Content – All content One piece of information is Content contains more
Accuracy throughout the clearly inaccurate. than one factual error.
presentation is accurate.
There are no factual errors.
Enthusiasm/ • Demonstrates strong • Shows little or mixed • Shows no interest in topic
Audience enthusiasm about topic feelings about the topic presented
Awareness during entire presentation being presented • Fails to increase audience
• Significantly increases • Raises audience understanding of
audience understanding understanding and knowledge of topic
 and knowledge of topic; knowledge of some points
convinces an audience to
recognize the validity and
importance of the subject.
Delivery Presenter Presenter spoke at a Presenter
demonstrated having paid good rate and demonstrated having paid
little attention to rate, volume. Presenter little attention to
volume, or grammar. maintained eye contact rate, volume, or grammar.
Presenter read nearly work while using, but not Presenter read nearly work
for word from notes. reading notes. for word from notes.
NAME: ______________________________
GRADE AND SECTION: ______________________________

PEER EVALUATION

Please evaluate your team members based on the specific criteria:

Task Accomplishment (1-5) Teamwork (1-5)

- 1: Consistently fails to meet tasks or deadlines. - 1: Rarely collaborates with the team, often works
- 2: Often misses deadlines and delivers subpar work. independently, and disrupts group dynamics.
- 3: Generally meets deadlines but may require - 2: Occasionally collaborates with the team but
reminders or quality improvements. prefers individual work over group tasks.
- 4: Consistently meets deadlines and delivers good- - 3: Generally collaborates with the team,
quality work. participates in group discussions, and contributes to
- 5: Exceeds expectations by consistently delivering group tasks.
high-quality work ahead of schedule. - 4: Consistently collaborates with the team, actively
engages in group activities, and offers valuable
contributions.
- 5: Demonstrates exceptional teamwork, actively
fosters collaboration, and consistently goes above and
beyond to support the team.
Communication (1-5) Overall Performance (1-5)
- 1: Poor communication, frequently fails to provide - 1: Ineffective overall performance, with frequent
updates or respond to messages. issues and disruptions.
- 2: Communication is often unclear, inconsistent, or - 2: Below-average performance, requiring
delayed. significant improvements.
- 3: Generally communicates effectively but may - 3: Satisfactory overall performance, with potential
occasionally lack proactiveness or clarity. for enhancements.
- 4: Effective communication, timely responses, and - 4: Good overall performance, making valuable
proactive updates. contributions to the team.
- 5: Excellent communication, consistently clear, - 5: Excellent overall performance, consistently
proactive, and transparent. exceeding expectations.

NAME Task Accomplishment Communication (1-5) Teamwork (1-5) Overall

(1-5) Performance (1-5)
 QUALITATIVE RESPONSES:

NAME OF MEMBER COMMENT

SELF-EVALUATION

Name Excellent - 10 Good - 8 Satisfactory - 6 Below Average - Poor - 2

(Demonstrates (Consistently (Generally, 4 (Rarely
exceptional collaborates with collaborates with (Occasionally collaborates with
teamwork, actively the team, actively the team, collaborates with the team, often
fosters collaboration, engages in group participates in the team, but works
and consistently goes activities, and group discussions, frequently prefers independently,
above and beyond to offers valuable and contributes individual work and disrupts
support the team) contributions) to group tasks) over group tasks) group dynamics)
1.

List down the things that you have worked on and contributed to the group as team member.