Skip to content

Conversation

@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

@tseaver tseaver commented Nov 11, 2020

Closes #309

@tseaver tseaver requested review from andrewsg and crwilcox November 11, 2020 22:03
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Nov 11, 2020
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the api: storage Issues related to the googleapis/python-storage API. label Nov 11, 2020
@tseaver tseaver requested review from busunkim96 and tswast November 12, 2020 21:09
Copy link
Contributor

@tswast tswast left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, though I'm curious if this would still be flakey on versions of Python where key names are ordered by time of entry.

@tseaver tseaver merged commit 59d859f into master Nov 12, 2020
@tseaver tseaver deleted the 309-fix-hash-order-assumption branch November 12, 2020 21:59
@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor Author

tseaver commented Nov 12, 2020

@tswast The only flake I saw was on Python 3.5.

cojenco pushed a commit to cojenco/python-storage that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2021
cojenco pushed a commit to cojenco/python-storage that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

api: storage Issues related to the googleapis/python-storage API. cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

New test for 'Blob._do_multipart_upload' w/ metadata flakes

2 participants