0% found this document useful (0 votes)
56 views21 pages

Thermal Oxidation Processes Overview

The document provides an overview of oxidation processes, focusing on thermal oxidation and its applications in semiconductor manufacturing. It details the mechanisms of dry and wet oxidation, oxide growth kinetics, and the effects of doping on oxidation rates. Additionally, it discusses relevant issues such as sodium diffusion and the use of electrochemical methods for controlled oxidation.

Uploaded by

arnabrp
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
56 views21 pages

Thermal Oxidation Processes Overview

The document provides an overview of oxidation processes, focusing on thermal oxidation and its applications in semiconductor manufacturing. It details the mechanisms of dry and wet oxidation, oxide growth kinetics, and the effects of doping on oxidation rates. Additionally, it discusses relevant issues such as sodium diffusion and the use of electrochemical methods for controlled oxidation.

Uploaded by

arnabrp
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

OXIDATION-

Overview

 Process Types
 Details of Thermal Oxidation
 Models
 Relevant Issues
Uses

 As a part of a structure
 e.g. Gate Oxide
 For hard masks
 e.g. In Nitride Etch, implant mask ...
 Protecting the silicon surface (Passivation )
 Insulator (ILD/IMD)
 As part of ‘mild etch’ (oxidation / removal cycles)

 Whether useful or not, automatically forms in ambient


 Native Oxide ( ~ 20 A thick)
 except H-terminated Si (111)
Processes

 Thermal Oxidation (Heating)


 Dry vs Wet
 Electrochemical Oxidation (Anodization)

 Oxide (and nitride)


 adhere well to the silicon
 good insulator
 Breakdown voltage 10 MV/cm
==> Can make a very thin gate
Structure

 Tetrahedral Structure
 each Si to four O
 each O to two Si
 Single crystal quartz (density 2.6 g/cm3)
 Fused silica (density 2.2 g/cm3)

©Time Domain CVD

 Reaction with water

Si  O  Si  H 2 0  Si  OH  Si  OH
 Si-OH termination is stable
 structure is more porous than Si-O-Si
Thermal Oxidation

Dry oxidation Wet oxidation

Si  2 H 2O  SiO2  2 H 2
Si  O2  SiO2
 Dense oxide formed (good quality,  Overall reaction
low diffusion)  Relatively porous oxide formed (lower quality
 slow growth rate species diffuse faster)
 Still good quality compared to
 NEED TO KEEP WATER OUT OF electrochem oxidation, for example
THE SYSTEM  faster growth rate

Dry oxide for gate ox Wet oxide for masking


Wet Oxidation
 Proposed Mechanism

 Hydration near Silicon/ Silicon oxide interface

Si  O  Si  H 2O  SiOH  SiOH
 Oxidation of silicon

2 Si  OH  Si  Si  2Si  O  Si  H 2
 Hydrogen rapidly diffuses out

 Some hydrogen may form hydroxyl group

Si  O   1 H 2  SiOH
2
Diffusivities in Oxide

 Oxygen diffuses faster (compared to water)


 Sodium and Hydrogen diffuse very fast

Diffusivity (log scale) Hydrogen

Oxygen Sodium

Water

1/T
Oxide Growth (Thermal)
Original Si surface

 To obtain 1 unit of oxide, almost half


unit of silicon is consumed (0.44)
 Oxidation occurs at the Si/SiO2
interface
Oxide Si
 i.e. Oxidizing species has to diffuse
through ‘already existing’ silicon oxide
Oxide Growth (Thermal)

Air (BL) Oxide Silicon

 At any point of time,


amount of oxide is variable ‘x’
 Usually, concentration of
oxidizing species (H2O or O2) is No
Concentration
sufficiently high in gas phase
Ni
==> Saturated in the oxide
interface

x
Distance
Oxidation Kinetics
 At steady state

 diffusion through oxide = reaction rate at the Si/SiO 2 interface

 Oxygen diffuses faster than Water

 However, water solubility is very high (1000 times)

 ==> Effectively water concentration at the interface is higher

 ==> wet oxidation faster

dN ( No  Ni )
Diffusion Flux JJ1= D dx D x

Reaction
J2= k N i
Rate

No
At steady state J1= J2=J N i D
kx  D
Oxidation Kinetics  6.023x1023 molecules
 =1 mol of oxide = x g of oxide
Flux at DN o
steady state
J  = y cm3 of oxide (from density)
xD  2.2 x 1022 molecules/cm3
k
 One O2 per SiO2
dx  Two H2O per SiO2
 Oxide Growth Rate =
dt
= Flux/ # oxidizing species per unit volume (of SiO2)

=
J  n = 2.2 × 1022 cm-3 for O2
 = 4.4 × 1022 cm-3 for H2O
n
dx DN o /n

dt x  D
k

Initial Condition x  xi at t 0
Deal-Grove Model Bruce Deal & Andy Grove
Solution
OR
2D 2 DN 0 x2 x
t  
2
x  x (t   ) B B  A
k n
N0
n
where
xi2 xi
   2D 2 DN o
B B
A   A
k
B
n
 is the time needed to grow the ‘initial’ oxide
 A and B depend on diffusivity “D”, solubility and # oxidizing species per unit
volume “n”
 A and B will be different for Dry and Wet oxidation
Linear & Parabolic Regimes
  4B  2 
1

x 0.5 A  1  2 (t   )   1
  A  
 
If one starts with thin oxide (or bare silicon)
 Very short Time

B
x  (t   )
A
 Longer Time
A2
x B (t   )
2
t    =
4B
 Linear vs Parabolic Regimes
 Kinetic Controlled vs Mass Transfer Controlled
 Initially faster growth rate, then slower growth rate
Experimental results for silicon dioxide thickness as a function
of reaction time and temperature for two substrate
orientations
Exponential Regime
If one starts with bare oxide

 For dry oxidation, one finds that  is not zero in the model fit
 A  corresponding to an initial thickness of 25 nm provides good fit
 Initial growth at very high rate
 Approximated by exponential curve

 Hypothesis 1
 Charged species forms
 holes diffuse faster / set up electrical field
 diffusion + drift ==> effective diffusivity high
 space charge regime controls
 length = 15 nm for oxygen, 0.5 nm for water
 ==> wet oxidation not affected
Exponential Regime
 Hypothesis 2
 In dry oxidation, many ‘open’ areas exist
 oxygen diffuses fast in silicon
 hence more initial growth rate
 once covered by silicon dioxide, slow diffusion

 Hypothesis 3
 Even before reaction (at high temp), oxygen dissolved in silicon (reasonable
diffusion)
 once temp is increased, 5 nm quick oxide formation
Temp Variation of
Linear/Parabolic Coeff
Solubility and Diffusion function of temp

Linear [B/A] Parabolic [B]

© May & Sze


Effect of Doping
 Doping increases oxidation rate
 Segregation
 ratio of dopant in silicon / dopant in oxide

 e.g. Boron incorporated in


oxide; more porous oxide
 more diffusion
 parabolic rate constant is
higher

P not incorporated in oxide


 no significant change in
parabolic rate constant

© May & Sze


Issues
 Na diffuses fast in oxide
 Use Cl during oxidation
 helps trap Na
 helps create volatile compounds of heavy metals (contaminant from furnace
etc)
 use 3% HCl or Tri chloro ethylene (TCE)

Ref: VLSI Fabrication Principles by S.K. Ghandhi


Electrochemical

 Use neutral solution and apply potential


 Pt as counter electrode (Hydrogen evolution)
 Use Ammonium hydrogen Phosphate or Phosphoric acid or ammonia solution
 Silicon diffuses out and forms oxide
 Increase in oxide thickness ==> increase in potential needed
 self limiting
 Oxide quality poor
 Used to oxidize controlled amount and strip
 for diagnosis

You might also like