0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views31 pages

E P PVA: Nergy Roduction by A Rray

Uploaded by

Mohamed Oreef
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views31 pages

E P PVA: Nergy Roduction by A Rray

Uploaded by

Mohamed Oreef
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

ENERGY PRODUCTION BY

A PV ARRAY
Prepared By

Dr. Haytham Gamal


2
ANNUAL ENERGY PRODUCTION
 The power produced by a PV system depends on a
range of factors which need to be examined when
the system is designed.
 Such analysis is conveniently carried out by
looking at the total annual energy produced by the
system.
 A comprehensive study has identified seven factors
influencing the annual performance of PV modules.
11/2/2024
Dr. Haytham Gamal
3
ANNUAL ENERGY PRODUCTION
 The factors influencing the annual performance of
PV modules:
1. Cumulative solar irradiance.
2. Module power rating at STC.
3. Operating temperature.
4. Maximum power point voltage dependence on
irradiance level.
5. Soiling.
11/2/2024
Dr. Haytham Gamal
4
ANNUAL ENERGY PRODUCTION
 The factors influencing the annual performance of
PV modules.
6. Variation in solar spectrum.
7. Optical losses when the sun is at a high angle
of incidence (AOI).

11/2/2024
Dr. Haytham Gamal
5
ANNUAL ENERGY PRODUCTION
1. Cumulative solar irradiance:
▪ Long-term irradiance profiles depend on surface
orientation and possibly tracking.
▪ This factor depends on the location.
▪ Varies between a reduction by about 25% for a
vertical surface to over 30% increase for two axis
tracking, in comparison with a latitude-tilt fixed
system.
11/2/2024
Dr. Haytham Gamal
6
ANNUAL ENERGY PRODUCTION
2. Module power rating at STC:
▪ Analysis of several PV technologies has been
carried out for the same power rating.

▪ It is observed that all technologies were


equivalent in terms of the expected annual
energy production within 5% calculation error.

11/2/2024
Dr. Haytham Gamal
7
ANNUAL ENERGY PRODUCTION
3. Operating temperature:
▪ The annual production can be reduced due to the
operating temperature by a factor between 2%
and 10%, depending on
a. Module design.
b. Wind speed.
c. Mounting technique.
d. Ambient temperature.
11/2/2024
Dr. Haytham Gamal
8
ANNUAL ENERGY PRODUCTION
4. Maximum power point voltage dependence
on irradiance level:
▪ Modules tend to have a value of the maximum
power point voltage larger at low irradiance
levels than at the standard test conditions.
▪ This fact can result in an additional 10% increase
in annual energy production.

11/2/2024
Dr. Haytham Gamal
9
ANNUAL ENERGY PRODUCTION
5. Soiling:
▪ Soiling may account for up to a 10% of reduction of
the annual energy production.
6. Variation in solar spectrum:
▪ The effects of the hourly variation of the solar
spectrum almost cancel out in a yearly basis.
▪ Amorphous silicon technology has the highest
sensitivity to this effect.
11/2/2024
▪ The observed changes usually remain under 3%. Dr. Haytham Gamal
10
ANNUAL ENERGY PRODUCTION
7. Optical losses when the sun is at a high angle of
incidence (AOI):
▪ Due to the increased reflectance of the cover glass of
the PV modules for AOI greater than 60º.
▪ However, the effect on a long-term basis is relatively
small (typically under 5%)
▪ Although it may have larger effect on a seasonal
basis (close to 10% for a vertical inclination)
11/2/2024
Dr. Haytham Gamal
11
PEAK SOLAR HOURS
 The initial approximate analysis and design of
a PV system is usually based on Peak Solar
Hours.
 The magnitude of PSH is equal to the length of
an equivalent day with a constant irradiance
equal to the 1-sun intensity (1 kW/m2), resulting
in the same value of the daily radiation.
11/2/2024  PSH has units of time and expressed in hours.
Dr. Haytham Gamal
12
PEAK SOLAR HOURS
 It has the same numerical value as the total daily
radiation in kWh/m2-day.
 Useful for flat-plate (non-concentrating) arrays.
 Accordingly, the total generation of a PV array
exposed to solar radiation a whole year can be
estimated as
365

𝐸𝐴 = ෍(𝑃𝑆𝐻)𝑖 𝑃0 .
𝑖=1
11/2/2024
Dr. Haytham Gamal
13
PEAK SOLAR HOURS
▪ (PSH)i : Value of the parameter PSH for day i.
▪ P0: Nominal array power under STC.
 For arrays operating at the maximum power point, the
normalized instantaneous power output depends on
temperature and irradiance, and the above equation is
therefore an approximation.
 A better estimate of the annual generation can be obtained
by a model which uses actual values of the ambient
temperature and estimates the cell operating temperature
11/2/2024 using the NOCT concept. Dr. Haytham Gamal
14
PEAK SOLAR HOURS
▪ Figure shows the error involved in the use of this
equation rather than taking into account the full
temperature and irradiance dependence of the array
power output.

11/2/2024
Dr. Haytham Gamal
15
PEAK SOLAR HOURS
 Example
 Given the average PSH can help in calculating
the number of solar panels required.
▪ Peak sun hours = 4
▪ Home used 10,000 kWh of electricity last
year.
▪ 10,000kWh / 365 days = 27.4 kWh per day
▪ 27.4 kWh per day / 4 PSH per day = 6.85 kWh.
11/2/2024
Dr. Haytham Gamal
16
NOMINAL ARRAY POWER
 For larger D.C systems:
▪ Usually includes an inverter.
▪ Power rating more than 1 kW.
▪ PV arrays operating at the MPP.
▪ The voltage is controlled by the maximum
power point tracker (MPPT) to follow the
optimum maximum power point voltage Vm.
11/2/2024
Dr. Haytham Gamal
17
NOMINAL ARRAY POWER
 For smaller stand-alone systems:
▪ Consisting of a charge regulator and a battery.
▪ The array voltage is controlled by the load.
▪ The array delivers power at a voltage close to the
battery voltage Vbat.

11/2/2024
Dr. Haytham Gamal
18
NOMINAL ARRAY POWER
 For smaller stand-alone systems:

11/2/2024
Dr. Haytham Gamal
19
NOMINAL ARRAY POWER
 For smaller stand-alone systems:
▪ A standard PV module consisting of 36
crystalline silicon cells has evolved from the
need to charge a 12 V battery.
▪ In practical usage, the module then operates
in the linear part of its I -V characteristic and
supplies approximately the same current Isc.
11/2/2024
Dr. Haytham Gamal
20
NOMINAL ARRAY POWER
 For smaller stand-alone systems:
▪ Losses in the charge regulator can often be
neglected and hence, the voltage drop is
small.
▪ The power delivered by the array to the
battery and load in parallel connection is
then
11/2/2024 𝑃𝐴 = 𝑉𝑏𝑎𝑡 𝐼𝑠𝑐 . Dr. Haytham Gamal
21
TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE OF ARRAY
POWER OUTPUT
 The principal effect of temperature on the PV
array output comes from the temperature
dependence of the open-circuit voltage.

𝑑𝑉𝑜𝑐
𝑉𝑜𝑐 𝑇𝑐 = 𝑉𝑜𝑐 𝑇𝑛 + 𝑇𝑐 − 25 .
𝑑𝑇
▪ Tc: Cell temperature.
▪ dVoc/dT : Voltage temperature coefficient.
11/2/2024
Dr. Haytham Gamal
22
TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE OF ARRAY
POWER OUTPUT
𝑑𝑉𝑜𝑐 𝑉𝑜𝑐 − 𝐸𝑔𝑜 − 𝛾𝐾𝐵 𝑇𝑐
= ∗ 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑠 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑙𝑒.
𝑑𝑇 𝑇𝑐
▪ EgO: Energy gap (extrapolated linearly to 0 K)
▪ kBTc: Thermal energy in electron volts.
▪ γ = 3 for silicon.
▪ For a typical module of 36 crystalline silicon cells,
a voltage temperature coefficient of approximately
11/2/2024 -80 mV/C. Dr. Haytham Gamal
23 MODULE ORIENTATION
 Fixed Tilt Arrays:
▪ PV generator output depends on solar radiation
incident on the inclined panels of the PV array.
▪ The array orientation will be constrained by the
nature of the support system.
▪ The orientation of a building integrated array will
normally be dictated by the orientation of the roof
or facade where the array is to be installed.
11/2/2024
Dr. Haytham Gamal
24 MODULE ORIENTATION
 Fixed Tilt Arrays:
▪ For a freestanding PV array, the array
orientation is to maximize the energy collection
by the inclined PV panels.
▪ This will frequently depend on the seasonal
nature of the load.
▪ Some applications require energy only during the
summer months such as many irrigation systems.
11/2/2024
Dr. Haytham Gamal
25 MODULE ORIENTATION
 Fixed Tilt Arrays:
▪ Recommended values for panel inclination are
summarized in the next table.

Season Optimum angle of inclination

Summer Latitude -15º

Winter Latitude +15º

Year average Latitude

11/2/2024
Dr. Haytham Gamal
26 MODULE ORIENTATION
 Fixed Tilt Arrays:

11/2/2024
Dr. Haytham Gamal
27 MODULE ORIENTATION
 Arrays with Tracking:
▪ PV arrays which track the sun can collect a
higher amount of energy than do those installed
at a fixed tilt.
▪ The use of tracking is common for concentrator
arrays which at least for appreciable
concentration ratios collect only the direct (beam)
radiation.
11/2/2024
Dr. Haytham Gamal
28 MODULE ORIENTATION
 Arrays with Tracking:
▪ The relationship between the annual solar radiation
captured by a tracking system and a fixed-tilt panel
inclined at the angle of latitude for several locations
across the world is illustrated in Figure.

11/2/2024
Dr. Haytham Gamal
29 MODULE ORIENTATION
 Arrays with Tracking:
▪ It is concluded that, on a yearly basis, the energy
capture by a tracking flat-plate system is
increased by more than 30% over a fixed array at
latitude inclination.
▪ At the same time, a tracking concentrator system
will collect more energy than will a Hat-plate
system only in locations with predominantly clear
11/2/2024
skies. Dr. Haytham Gamal
30 MODULE ORIENTATION
 Arrays with Tracking:

11/2/2024
Dr. Haytham Gamal

You might also like