Scribd
Upload
166 views2 pages

Jaumann-Zaremba and Truesdell Rates Proofs

Ravid Cohen submitted homework #4 which included proofs of objectivity for the Jaumann-Zaremba and Truesdell rates. The proofs showed that when the rates are transformed by an orthogonal tensor Q, the transformed rates are equal to Q times the original rates times QT, demonstrating their objective nature.

Uploaded by

Ravid Cohen
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
166 views2 pages

Jaumann-Zaremba and Truesdell Rates Proofs

Ravid Cohen submitted homework #4 which included proofs of objectivity for the Jaumann-Zaremba and Truesdell rates. The proofs showed that when the rates are transformed by an orthogonal tensor Q, the transformed rates are equal to Q times the original rates times QT, demonstrating their objective nature.

Uploaded by

Ravid Cohen
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Name: Ravid Cohen

ID: 209423342

Coupled Problems in Functional Materials – Homework #4

1. Prove objectivity of the Jaumann-Zaremba and Truesdell rates.

Solution:

Jaumann-Zaremba rate:

Å = Aሶ − WA − AW T

Proof:

I want to show that:

Å∗ = QÅQT

I’ll use the following identity in order to formulate this equation:

1
W = (L − LT )
2
T
1 1
𝐑𝐇𝐒 = Å∗ = Aሶ∗ − W ∗ A∗ − A∗ W ∗ T =
⏟ Aሶ − (L∗ − L∗T ) ∙ A∗ − A∗ ∙ (L∗ − L∗T ) =
identity
2 2

1 T 1 T T
QሶAQT + QAሶQT + QAQሶT − [QLQT + QሶQT − (QLQT + QሶQT ) ] QAQT − QAQT [QLQT + QሶQT − (QLQT + QሶQT ) ] =
2 2

1 1
⏟ QሶAQT + QAሶQT + QAQሶT − [QLQT + QሶQT − QLT QT − QQሶT ]QAQT − QAQT [QLQT + QሶQT − QLT QT − QQሶT ] =
=
(∗),(∗∗)
2 2

1 1
= QሶAQT + QAሶQT + QAQሶT − [QLAQT + QAሶQT − QLT AQT − QሶAQT ] − [QLAQT + QA
ሶ QT − QLT AQT − QሶAQT ] =
2 2

= QሶAQT + QAሶQT + QAQሶT − QLAQT + QLT AQT = Qሶ(Å − LA + LT A)QT = QÅ∗ QT = 𝐋𝐇𝐒

(*) Q is orthogonal ⟹ (1) det(Q) = 1 (2) Q−1 = QT


Q−1 ∙ Q = I ⟹ QT ∙ Q = I ; QT ∙ Q−T = I ⟹ Q−1 ∙ Q−T = I

⟹ QT (Q − Q−T ) = 0 ⟹ Q = Q−T

(**) (𝐀 ∙ 𝐁)−1 = 𝐁−1 ∙ 𝐀−1

Truesdell rate:

Å = Aሶ − LA − ALT + tr(L) ∙ A

Proof:

I want to show that:

Å∗ = QÅ∗ QT

𝐑𝐇𝐒 = Å∗ = Aሶ∗ − L∗ A∗ − A∗ L∗ T + tr(L)


⏟ ∙ A∗ =
scalar a∗=0

T
= QሶAQT + QAሶQT + QAQሶT − (QLQT + QሶQT )QAQT − QAQT (QLQT + QሶQT ) + tr(L) ∙ QAQT =

= QሶAQT + QAሶQT + QAQሶT − QLAQT − QሶAQT − QAQT (QLT QT + QQሶT ) + tr(L) ∙ QAQT =

= QሶAQT + QAሶQT + QAQሶT − QLAQT − QሶAQT − QALT QT − QAQሶT + Q ∙ tr(L) ∙ AQT =

= QAሶQT − QLAQT − QALT QT + Q ∙ tr(L) ∙ AQT = Q (Aሶ − LA − ALT + tr(L) ∙ A) QT = QÅQT = 𝐋𝐇𝐒

You might also like