2.
1 TITLE: Relational Collaborative Topic
RegressionComputing Takin Control Away from the User (2013).
AUTHOR NAME:
Anind Dey, Louise Barkhuus
DESCRIPTION
In an experimental case study conducted using mobile
phone applications to exemplify different levels of interactivity
between
mobile
computing
device
and
its
user:
personalization and context-awareness, investigations were
made as to which approach will limit users' perceived sense of
control and also users' preferences for the three approaches.
The study showed that users feel less in control when
using Relational Collaborative Topic Regressionapplications
than when personalizing their own applications. Despite this
it
was
also
found
that
Relational
Collaborative
Topic
Regressionapplications are preferred over the personalization
oriented ones. Hence it was concluded that people are willing
to give up partial control if the reward in usefulness is great
enough.
Relational Collaborative Topic Regressioncomputing is
poised to fundamentally change how we interact with our
devices, Justin Rattner, CTO of Intel told attendees at the
companys developer conference.Future devices will learn
about you, your day, where you are and where you are going
to know what you want, he added. They will know your
likes and dislikes.
ADVANTAGE
Relational Collaborative Topic Regressionsystems. It
is specialized for tasks like Zone or inventory
management, Asset tracking, Condition tracking,
Presence, Network location services.
Context-awareness is used to do all that operations
more
intelligent
and
efficient.
Relational
Collaborative TopicRegressioncomputing
DISADVANTAGE
This similarity based collaborative filtering matrix
factorization if
into low rank matrix the recommend other tags according to its
neighbors tags it only uses the item matrix information
2.2 TITLE: Matrix Factorization through Latent
DirichletAllocation(2013)
AUTHOR NAME: Deepak Agarwal ,Bee-Chung Chen
DESCRIPTION
matrix factorization method topredict ratings in
recommender
system
applications
wherea
\bag-of-words"
representation for item meta-data is natural.Such scenarios are
common
place
in
web
applications
likecontent
recommendation,ad targeting and web search whereitems are
articles, ads and web pages respectively. Becauseofdata
sparseness, regularization is key to good predictiveaccuracy.
Our method works byregularizing both user anditem factors
simultaneously through user features and the bag of words
associated with each item. Specically, eachword in an item is
associated with a discrete latent factoroften referred to as the
topic of the word; item topics areobtained by averaging topics
across all words in an item.Then, user rating on an item is
modeled as user's anity tothe item's topics where user anity
to topics (user factors)and topic assignments to words in items
(item factors) . To avoid overtting,user and item factors are
regularized through Gaussian lin-ear regression and We show
our model is accurate, interpretableand handles both cold-start
and warm-start scenarios seam-lessly through a single model
As a by-product,fLDA also identies interesting topics that
explains user-item interactions. Our method also generalizes a
recentlyproposed technique called supervised LDA (sLDA) to
col-laborative
itemtopic
ltering
vectors
in
applications.
a
supervised
While
sLDA
fashion
for
estimates
a
single
regression,fLDA incorporates multiple regressions (one for each
user)in estimating the item factors.
ADVANTAGE
A new factorization model based on Latent Dirichlet
Allocation for predicting dyadic response that is both
accurate and interpretable when items have a bag-ofwords like representation. the predictions are inuencedby ratings even
for new items.
DISADVANTAGE
Our method works by regularizing both user anditem
factors simultaneously through user features and thebag
of words associated with each item. Specically
item is associated with a discrete latent factor often
referred to as the topic of the word; item topics are
obtained by averaging topics across all words in an item.