Last revised: September 24, 2026
By: Adam Burns
Baldwin’s Centipede was a 91-foot diesel with twelve axles and the ride of an electric. The catalog name is DR-12-8-1500/2, also written DR-12-8-3000: diesel road locomotive, twelve axles, eight of them motored, two De La Vergne 608SC engines at 1,500 horsepower each. Seaboard Air Line asked for it. The railroad wanted 6,000 horsepower from two units on a 2-D+D-2 wheel arrangement. Baldwin built the production fleet from December 3, 1945 (Seaboard 4500) through July 20, 1948 (Ferrocarriles Nacionales de México 6413). Fifty-two locomotives were sold, to the Seaboard, the Pennsylvania, and the NdeM. Two more, finished for a cancelled Union Pacific order, stayed on the builder’s account. All were scrapped.
The 1943 test bed is the same locomotive as Seaboard 4500. Baldwin finished demonstrator 6000 that May with four of eight planned engines in the carbody, stored it, and in 1944 Seaboard officers found it at Eddystone. The frame, cab, and running gear were rebuilt around two 608SC engines. This page is that machine: the test bed, the 3,000-horsepower catalog model, John F. Kirkland’s account of it, and the 54-line production roster.
Seaboard Air Line Centipede #4500 in Florida in early December 1945, shortly before it entered service between Jacksonville and St. Petersburg. This is the rebuilt 1943 demonstrator 6000. American-Rails.com collection.
On this page: At a glance · Essl’s test bed · What the name means · Who bought them · John Kirkland’s comments · A dual-mode study · On the Pennsylvania · Gearing · Data sheets · Production roster · What became of them
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Builder | Baldwin Locomotive Works, Eddystone, Pennsylvania. De La Vergne engines. Westinghouse generators and traction motors |
| Catalog model | DR-12-8-1500/2, also DR-12-8-3000. Baldwin class DR 12-8-1500/2 SC-1. Baby Face carbody |
| Wheel arrangement | 2-D+D-2. Two unpowered axles, four motored, articulation, four motored, two unpowered |
| Engines | Two 608SC straight-eights, Roots-blown, 1,500 hp each, 3,000 hp. Oil-fired steam generator |
| 1943 test bed | Demonstrator 6000. Class 4-8+8-4 750/8 DE1. Construction 64639. Eight Model 408s planned at 750 hp; four installed. Completed May 28, 1943. Rebuilt as Seaboard 4500 |
| Size and weight | 91 ft 6 in over coupler pulling faces. 15 ft to the cab roof. 10 ft 4¾ in wide. Production weight 595,000 lb. The 1943 unit weighed 685,000 lb |
| Production | December 3, 1945 – July 20, 1948. Baldwin serials 1–54. 52 sold (Seaboard 14, NdeM 14, Pennsylvania 24). Two demonstrators never sold |
| Pennsylvania | 12 drawbar pairs, 5823A1/A2–5834A1/A2, class BP60. Later numbered 5811–5834 and reclassed BH50 for helper service |
| Preserved | All scrapped |
Specifications follow John F. Kirkland, The Diesel Builders, Volume III: Baldwin Locomotive Works (Interurban Press, 1994), as carried on this page’s data sheets. Information compiled September 24, 2026.
Baldwin drew the Centipede as a passenger locomotive. The wheel arrangement is the diesel answer to a ride the Pennsylvania had already bought in electric form. In 1934 the railroad tested prototypes on its electrified line at Claymont, Delaware. The winner was the GG1, a 2-C+C-2, and Baldwin built a large share of the production fleet. A decade later Seaboard wanted that tracking in a diesel for the Florida lines.
Charles A. Brown’s May 1982 Trains article starts the diesel side of the story with Max Essl and a locomotive built around several small engine-generator sets. The hardware was demonstrator 6000. Baldwin ordered the eight engines on May 27, 1940. The War Production Board cleared completion in 1942. Class 4-8+8-4 750/8 DE1, construction number 64639, was to carry eight De La Vergne Model 408s at 750 horsepower and 1,050 rpm, 6,000 horsepower in one carbody, Westinghouse 370A motors, a 488C main generator, 25:54 gearing, and a 120 mph top speed. Weight on Kirkland’s sheet is 685,000 pounds. Delays and cost stopped the work in the spring of 1943 with four engines installed. Baldwin called the locomotive complete on May 28, 1943, and tried it on the Pennsylvania, the Reading, and the Baltimore & Ohio around Philadelphia.
The plant worked. A single 6,000-horsepower passenger unit offered less redundancy than an A-B-A of three 2,000-horsepower locomotives, which is what Electro-Motive and Alco were selling, and Baldwin could not build the eight-engine carbody at a profit. A freight version of the same idea, drawn at 4,500 horsepower with lower gearing, stayed on the drawing board. No. 6000 went into storage at Eddystone.
Baldwin’s experimental Centipede, demonstrator #6000, completed May 28, 1943. The design called for eight 750-horsepower De La Vergne Model 408 engines. Four were installed. The frame, cab, and running gear later became Seaboard Air Line #4500.
Kirkland’s account of the next step is the one to keep. In 1944 Seaboard officers touring Eddystone came across the stored 2-D+D-2. They wanted the wheel arrangement, and they wanted 6,000 horsepower split across two locomotives. Baldwin rebuilt 6000 with its then-current 608SC, two engines at 1,500 horsepower, Roots blowers, an oil-fired steam generator, and Westinghouse 370F motors on a 471A main generator. The new class was DR-12-8-1500/2. Completed on December 3, 1945, under a new construction number, 71579, it still carried 6000 for a moment and then became Seaboard Air Line 4500. It went into passenger service on December 13, 1945, Jacksonville to St. Petersburg, geared 21:58, good for 93.5 mph. Seaboard ordered thirteen more.
Baldwin builder photograph of new Seaboard Air Line #4500 at Eddystone after completion on December 3, 1945. The locomotive entered Jacksonville–St. Petersburg service on December 13.
The 2-D+D-2 is electric notation, which is the right family for this running gear. A “2” is a pair of unpowered axles. “D” is four motored axles, the same alphabet that makes a B a two-motor truck and a C a three-motor truck. The plus sign is the articulation between the two halves. Eight Westinghouse traction motors, twelve axles, and a guided truck at each end: that is the GG1 idea carried into a diesel, with one more motored axle on each half.
Baldwin’s own string reads the same locomotive from the catalog. DR is Diesel Road. The 12 is every axle. The 8 is the motored axles. The 3000 is the horsepower. The builder’s longer form, DR-12-8-1500/2, spells the same fact as two engines of 1,500 horsepower. Later Baldwin model codes shortened the horsepower to two digits, so a 2,000-horsepower Baby Face is a DR-6-4-20. The Centipede kept the full number in one of its names and the split rating in the other. Both appear on the data sheets below. They are one model.
Seaboard’s result was public enough that the orders came quickly. The Pennsylvania took twelve semi-permanently coupled pairs, 24 locomotives, at $287,250 each. The 24-unit order came to $6,894,000. The first pair, 5823A1 and 5823A2, was completed on April 17, 1947, geared 22:57, with a 100 mph passenger rating. As delivered they were class BP60: Baldwin passenger, 6,000 horsepower for the pair. Each pair shared a construction number, with A1 and A2 suffixes. The railroad later split the drawbars for couplers and numbered the units individually as 5811–5834.
A Pennsylvania Centipede set at West Philadelphia on January 7, 1958, with #5832 closest to the camera. By this date the fleet was in the individually numbered 5811–5834 series. American-Rails.com collection.
Ferrocarriles Nacionales de México took fourteen, 6400–6413. Baldwin’s serial 2, NdeM 6400, was completed April 15, 1947. Serial 3, NdeM 6401, was completed January 10, 1948, and the last of the Mexican units, 6413, left Eddystone on July 20, 1948, the last Centipede completed. Kenneth L. Douglas’s companion article in the May 1982 Trains is the Mexican chapter: high-altitude service, and a 1953 return to Baldwin for overhaul. The last of them were still at work in 1971.
Ferrocarriles Nacionales de México Centipede #6401, completed January 10, 1948. César Martínez Ávila collection.
Union Pacific ordered a pair as 998 and 999 and cancelled it. Baldwin finished the locomotives on March 16, 1948, construction numbers 73129 and 73130, and showed them as demonstrators 6000 (the second locomotive to carry that number) and 6001. Kirkland notes that they went out geared 15:63, the freight ratio, so a railroad could watch the tracking with only eight motors. They remained demonstrators and were parted out.
John F. Kirkland worked at Baldwin from 1940 until the company left the locomotive business. The Diesel Builders, Volume III: Baldwin Locomotive Works (Pasadena: Interurban Press, 1994) is his record of that work, and the Centipede passage below is his. The production roster and the specification sheets on this page follow the same book.
Baldwin considered the Centipede an optional model which was offered as an alternate to conventional locomotive models where track conditions made such a wheel arrangement highly desirable.
Baldwin felt there might be a demand for this locomotive equipped with traction motors on all 12 axles for use in heavy drag operations. Had it been so equipped it would have, in effect, functioned like a six traction motored 3,000 horsepower road switcher coupled to a six traction motored slug.
This was one of the premises that prompted placing demonstrators numbers 6000 and 6001 on the road equipped with 15:63 freight gearing. In this manner the general design of this model, together with its unexcelled tracking characteristics, could be observed by potential customers, even though it was equipped with only eight traction motors.
The reception given by the railroads in the 1945-1950 period to these Baldwin Centipedes was essentially the same as that given to the big high-horsepower dual engine equipped locomotives that were introduced to the trade again in the mid-1960s by Alco, EMD, and GE.
Summed up in a few words, they did not possess the flexibility that was inherent when obtaining the same horsepower through the use of two smaller locomotives operating in multiple unit. Whereas there were three purchasers of Centipedes, 20 years later there were only two purchasers of big dual engine equipped locomotives.
One of the three articles on Centipedes that appears in a well read railfan magazine was devoted to discussing the “Engineering faux pas” built into the Pennsylvania Railroad’s 12 pairs of locomotives.
Adverse comment was offered about their poor tracking characteristics; lack of dynamic brake; inability to multiple with any other type of locomotive of any make other than themselves, and then only when coupled back-to-back; difficulty of changing out worn brake shoes; problems with the engines due to operation over mountainous terrain; and excessive piston ring and cylinder liner wear, together with excessive lube oil consumption.
This type of negative commentary would have been spoiled had the facts relating to these purported deficiencies been presented. To support this assertion, some facts, rather than opinions, will be offered.
The rest of the chapter is that rebuttal, and the book is the place to read it in full. Dynamic brakes and multiple-unit control were options on the Centipede, as they were on Baldwin’s other diesels. The Pennsylvania’s brake-shoe complaint followed from shops that lacked an inspection pit for this running gear. The Seaboard built the pits. A GG1 was maintained from the same kind of pit, and the Pennsylvania already owned more than a hundred of those. The derailments came when the Centipedes were placed mid-train, or behind a freight as pushers. The torque, and the outside rail of a curve, did the damage. Seaboard kept its Centipedes on the head end. Electric trouble, lubrication trouble, and engine fires on the Pennsylvania’s passenger assignments were real, and they are a separate list from the tracking argument.
While the Centipede was in production, the Denver & Rio Grande Western studied a freight version that could run as a diesel or as a straight electric. The territory was the Moffat Route, Denver to Bond via the Moffat Tunnel, 129 miles, and 54 miles in Utah between Thistle and Helper. Under the wire the leading and trailing axles would have been motored as well, a B-D+D-B, at 6,000 horsepower for one unit and 12,000 for a pair. Off the wire the end axles would have idled, as on a production Centipede. It was the same impulse that later produced Electro-Motive’s FL9, applied to a mountain freight railroad. The locomotives stayed on paper. A dual-mode machine on Baldwin engines and Westinghouse electrical gear was a product Alco and General Electric, the partners a joint project would have required, had little reason to help the other two firms sell.
The Pennsylvania bought the Centipede for the head end of passenger trains. Class BP60, 22:57 gearing, 100 mph. Within a few years electrical trouble and lubrication trouble, sometimes an engine fire, took them off those assignments. By 1951 the drawbars had been replaced with couplers and the gearing changed to 15:63: 65 mph, and 85,600 pounds of continuous tractive effort at 10.5 mph on Baldwin’s gear table. The railroad reclassed them BH50. That class is the helper rating, 2,500 horsepower per unit, 5,000 for a pair. They went to work as pushers on westbound freights between Altoona and Gallitzin, over Horseshoe Curve, the service the running gear was least suited to. In 1958 many moved to helper jobs between Altoona and Enola. At least one worked as the Paoli pusher.
Pennsylvania #5822 and a second Centipede on a westbound freight at Altoona, Pennsylvania, July 1960, photographed from the 8th Street Bridge. The number is the individual series applied after the railroad split the drawbar pairs. David Sweetland photo.
William Volkmer’s chapter in the same May 1982 Trains is the Pennsylvania personality piece, written by a man who liked the locomotive. The mechanical department’s verdict was colder. Before the fleet was retired, the railroad looked at stripping the engines and rebuilding the carbodies as straight electrics. Great Northern was disposing of its Cascade Tunnel motors in the mid-1950s, and the Pennsylvania bought those. On the Pennsylvania they were class FF2, covered with the rest of the electric classes on the electric roster. The Centipedes were out of revenue service by the early 1960s. The last of them were at scrap in 1964.
Baldwin offered the production model with a choice of gear ratios. Seaboard 4500 was delivered at 21:58. The Pennsylvania’s passenger pairs were 22:57, and the helper conversion was 15:63. The 25:54 row is the 120 mph option. It is a production figure. The 1943 test bed also carried 25:54 gearing, and Kirkland’s sheet for that heavier locomotive, with 370A motors, rates it at 45,000 pounds at 39 mph. The two ratings belong to two power plants.
| Gear ratio | Maximum speed (mph) | Continuous tractive effort (lb) | Speed at that rating (mph) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15:63 | 65 | 85,600 | 10.5 |
| 19:60 | 82 | 64,400 | 14.0 |
| 21:58 | 93.5 | 56,200 | 16.0 |
| 22:57 | 100 | 52,800 | 17.6 |
| 23:56 | 106 | 49,600 | 18.8 |
| 25:54 | 120 | 44,000 | 20.6 |
| Item | Specification |
|---|---|
| Engines ordered | May 27, 1940 |
| Date completed | May 28, 1943 |
| Baldwin class | 4-8+8-4 750/8 DE1 |
| Construction number | 64639 |
| Engine | Model 408, eight at 750 hp (four installed) |
| Engine builder | De La Vergne |
| Supercharger | Roots |
| Steam generator | Oil-fired |
| Horsepower | 6,000 designed |
| Engine speed | 1,050 rpm |
| Length over coupler pulling faces | 91 ft 6 in |
| Height, rail to cab roof | 15 ft |
| Width | 10 ft 4¾ in |
| Weight | 685,000 lb |
| Trucks | 2-D+D-2 |
| Wheel size | 40 in |
| Traction motors | Westinghouse 370A, eight |
| Traction generator | Westinghouse 488C |
| Auxiliary generator | Westinghouse YG37B |
| Gear ratio | 25:54 |
| Tractive effort | 45,000 lb at 39 mph |
| Top speed | 120 mph |
No. 4500 reused the 1943 frame and running gear, and Kirkland’s sheet keeps that unit’s 40-inch wheels. The catalog specification further down the page gives the production model 42-inch wheels.
| Item | Specification |
|---|---|
| Date completed | December 3, 1945 |
| Baldwin class | DR 12-8-1500/2 SC-1 |
| Construction number | 71579 |
| Engine | 608SC, two |
| Engine builder | De La Vergne |
| Supercharger | Roots |
| Steam generator | Oil-fired |
| Horsepower | 3,000 |
| Length over coupler pulling faces | 91 ft 6 in |
| Height, rail to cab roof | 15 ft |
| Width | 10 ft 4¾ in |
| Weight | 595,000 lb |
| Trucks | 2-D+D-2 |
| Wheel size | 40 in |
| Traction motors | Westinghouse 370F, eight |
| Traction generator | Westinghouse 471A |
| Auxiliary generator | Westinghouse YG42A |
| Gear ratio | 21:58 |
| Continuous tractive effort | 56,200 lb at 16 mph |
| Top speed | 93.5 mph |
| Item | Specification |
|---|---|
| Entered production | December 3, 1945 (Seaboard Air Line 4500) |
| Years produced | December 3, 1945 – July 20, 1948 |
| Baldwin class | DR 12-8-1500/2 SC-1 |
| Engine | 608SC, two |
| Engine builder | De La Vergne |
| Supercharger | Roots |
| Steam generator | Oil-fired |
| Horsepower | 3,000 |
| Length over coupler pulling faces | 91 ft 6 in |
| Height, rail to cab roof | 15 ft |
| Width | 10 ft 4¾ in |
| Weight | 595,000 lb |
| Trucks | 2-D+D-2 |
| Wheel size | 42 in |
| Traction motors | Westinghouse 370F, eight |
| Traction generator | Westinghouse 471A |
| Auxiliary generator | Westinghouse YG42A |
| Gear ratio | Optional. See the table above |
Total on the Baldwin serial list = 54. Fifty-two were sold. The table follows Kirkland’s Baldwin serial number, which is the model sequence. Completion dates and construction numbers follow their own sequences. Pennsylvania pairs share one construction number, distinguished by the A1 and A2 suffixes. NdeM is Ferrocarriles Nacionales de México. The 1943 test bed is Seaboard 4500.
| Owner | Road number | Baldwin serial | Construction number | Completed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seaboard Air Line | 4500 | 1 | 71579 | 12/3/1945 |
| NdeM | 6400 | 2 | 72672 | 4/15/1947 |
| NdeM | 6401 | 3 | 72673 | 1/10/1948 |
| NdeM | 6402 | 4 | 72674 | 4/21/1948 |
| NdeM | 6403 | 5 | 72675 | 5/4/1948 |
| NdeM | 6404 | 6 | 72676 | 5/9/1948 |
| NdeM | 6405 | 7 | 72677 | 5/14/1948 |
| NdeM | 6406 | 8 | 72678 | 5/21/1948 |
| NdeM | 6407 | 9 | 72679 | 5/31/1948 |
| NdeM | 6408 | 10 | 72680 | 6/13/1948 |
| NdeM | 6409 | 11 | 72681 | 7/8/1948 |
| NdeM | 6410 | 12 | 72682 | 7/8/1948 |
| NdeM | 6411 | 13 | 72683 | 7/9/1948 |
| NdeM | 6412 | 14 | 72684 | 7/18/1948 |
| NdeM | 6413 | 15 | 72685 | 7/20/1948 |
| Baldwin (demonstrator) | 6000 (2nd) | 16 | 73129 | 3/16/1948 |
| Baldwin (demonstrator) | 6001 | 17 | 73130 | 3/16/1948 |
| Pennsylvania | 5823A1 | 18 | 73131A1 | 4/17/1947 |
| Pennsylvania | 5823A2 | 19 | 73131A2 | 4/17/1947 |
| Seaboard Air Line | 4501 | 20 | 73141 | 3/15/1947 |
| Seaboard Air Line | 4502 | 21 | 73142 | 4/9/1947 |
| Seaboard Air Line | 4503 | 22 | 73143 | 4/22/1947 |
| Seaboard Air Line | 4504 | 23 | 73144 | 5/11/1947 |
| Seaboard Air Line | 4505 | 24 | 73145 | 5/18/1947 |
| Pennsylvania | 5824A1 | 25 | 73377A1 | 5/10/1947 |
| Pennsylvania | 5824A2 | 26 | 73377A2 | 5/10/1947 |
| Pennsylvania | 5825A1 | 27 | 73378A1 | 6/15/1947 |
| Pennsylvania | 5825A2 | 28 | 73378A2 | 6/15/1947 |
| Pennsylvania | 5826A1 | 29 | 73379A1 | 9/5/1947 |
| Pennsylvania | 5826A2 | 30 | 73379A2 | 9/5/1947 |
| Pennsylvania | 5827A1 | 31 | 73380A1 | 10/15/1947 |
| Pennsylvania | 5827A2 | 32 | 73380A2 | 10/15/1947 |
| Pennsylvania | 5828A1 | 33 | 73381A1 | 11/15/1947 |
| Pennsylvania | 5828A2 | 34 | 73381A2 | 11/15/1947 |
| Pennsylvania | 5829A1 | 35 | 73382A1 | 12/20/1947 |
| Pennsylvania | 5829A2 | 36 | 73382A2 | 12/20/1947 |
| Pennsylvania | 5830A1 | 37 | 73383A1 | 1/17/1948 |
| Pennsylvania | 5830A2 | 38 | 73383A2 | 1/17/1948 |
| Pennsylvania | 5831A1 | 39 | 73384A1 | 1/31/1948 |
| Pennsylvania | 5831A2 | 40 | 73384A2 | 1/31/1948 |
| Pennsylvania | 5832A1 | 41 | 73385A1 | 2/7/1948 |
| Pennsylvania | 5832A2 | 42 | 73385A2 | 2/7/1948 |
| Pennsylvania | 5833A1 | 43 | 73386A1 | 2/18/1948 |
| Pennsylvania | 5833A2 | 44 | 73386A2 | 2/18/1948 |
| Pennsylvania | 5834A1 | 45 | 73387A1 | 2/28/1948 |
| Pennsylvania | 5834A2 | 46 | 73387A2 | 2/28/1948 |
| Seaboard Air Line | 4506 | 47 | 73146 | 6/10/1947 |
| Seaboard Air Line | 4507 | 48 | 73147 | 7/26/1947 |
| Seaboard Air Line | 4508 | 49 | 73390 | 9/25/1947 |
| Seaboard Air Line | 4509 | 50 | 73391 | 9/28/1947 |
| Seaboard Air Line | 4510 | 51 | 73392 | 11/22/1947 |
| Seaboard Air Line | 4511 | 52 | 73393 | 12/4/1947 |
| Seaboard Air Line | 4512 | 53 | 73394 | 12/28/1947 |
| Seaboard Air Line | 4513 | 54 | 73395 | 1/4/1948 |
Demonstrators 6000 (2nd) and 6001 were ordered by the Union Pacific as 998 and 999. The order was cancelled. The locomotives were never sold, and were parted out. Seaboard 4500’s construction number, 71579, is the 1945 rebuild. The 1943 test bed was construction number 64639.
Seaboard kept its fourteen in road service for close to fifteen years and was done with them by the early 1960s. The Pennsylvania’s twenty-four lasted about as long in calendar years and a much shorter time in the job they were bought for. Revenue use was over by the early 1960s, and the last of the carbodies were at scrap in 1964. NdeM sent its units back to Baldwin in 1953 for overhaul and upgrades, and the last of that fleet ran until 1971. The two demonstrators stayed Baldwin’s and were parted out. Every Centipede was scrapped.
The locomotive remains what Kirkland said it was: an optional model, for a railroad that wanted this wheel arrangement, bought by three companies when the trade was already deciding that the same horsepower was more useful in two smaller units. The Pennsylvania then asked it to push. The tracking story that followed is the story of that assignment.
Sep 26, 26 11:59 PM
Sep 26, 26 11:56 PM
Sep 26, 26 11:51 PM
Sep 26, 26 11:51 AM
Sep 26, 26 11:47 AM
Sep 26, 26 11:39 AM
Sep 26, 26 11:32 AM
Sep 25, 26 09:38 PM
Sep 25, 26 09:13 PM
Sep 25, 26 10:24 AM
Sep 25, 26 09:52 AM
Sep 25, 26 12:29 AM
Sep 25, 26 12:02 AM
Sep 24, 26 11:56 PM
Sep 24, 26 11:27 PM
Sep 24, 26 01:18 PM
Sep 24, 26 01:12 PM
Sep 24, 26 01:01 PM
Sep 24, 26 12:36 PM
Sep 24, 26 12:35 PM
Sep 24, 26 12:14 PM
Sep 24, 26 12:10 PM
Sep 24, 26 12:08 PM
Sep 24, 26 12:02 PM
Sep 24, 26 11:24 AM
Sep 24, 26 09:40 AM
Sep 24, 26 09:28 AM
Sep 24, 26 12:24 AM
Sep 24, 26 12:13 AM
Sep 24, 26 12:01 AM
Sep 23, 26 05:19 PM
Sep 23, 26 03:28 PM
Sep 23, 26 01:11 PM
Sep 23, 26 01:03 PM
Sep 23, 26 12:57 PM
Sep 23, 26 12:46 PM
Sep 23, 26 12:32 PM
Sep 23, 26 11:42 AM
Sep 23, 26 12:32 AM
Sep 23, 26 12:28 AM
Sep 23, 26 12:21 AM
Sep 23, 26 12:13 AM
Sep 23, 26 12:04 AM
Sep 22, 26 11:52 PM
Sep 22, 26 11:45 PM
Sep 22, 26 11:17 PM
Sep 22, 26 11:13 PM
Sep 22, 26 10:59 PM
Sep 22, 26 10:02 PM
Sep 22, 26 04:48 PM