Skip to content

Deal with TLS client certificates and HTTP authentication #2

Open

Description

@annevk

Ideally we put all the language in the Storage Standard and layer this on top, but until that happens...

Activity

  1. added a commit that references this issue on Jul 20, 2016
  2. Foxyroxy1 commented on Feb 10, 2017

    @Foxyroxy1
  3. mikewest commented on Mar 23, 2017

    @mikewest
    Member

    I landed a hand-wavey thing a while ago. I guess it should really be talking about https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#authentication-entry, but it's not clear to me how those exist/are stored/etc.

    Thoughts?

  4. annevk commented on Mar 23, 2017

    @annevk
    MemberAuthor

    I'm not sure how they are stored either or what the requirements around that are. It seems implementations are allowed to pursue various strategies.

  5. mikewest commented on Mar 23, 2017

    @mikewest
    Member

    Ok. I'll wave my hands a little bit more in the hopes of clarity.

  6. annevk commented on Mar 23, 2017

    @annevk
    MemberAuthor

    I think referencing the Fetch concept is probably good. And then hopefully at some point someone makes that more precise (or maybe you end up killing it first).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions