Skip to content

Conversation

@RobbieTheWagner
Copy link
Member

@RobbieTheWagner RobbieTheWagner commented Dec 5, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Added automatic build execution during package preparation/installation.
  • Tests / CI

    • Improved CI test workflow with dependency install steps and caching for faster, more reliable test runs and test tool installation.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 5, 2025

Walkthrough

Adds a prepare script to package.json to run pnpm build, and updates the GitHub Actions workflow to add dependency installation, a Cypress binary cache/restore step, and an explicit Cypress binary installation step before tests.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Package configuration
package.json
Added "prepare": "pnpm build" script to run build during package preparation.
CI workflow
.github/workflows/main.yml
Reworked steps after Node setup: added an explicit "Install dependencies" step, introduced Cypress binary caching (cache key based on OS and pnpm-lock.yaml with restore-keys), and added an "Install Cypress binary" step before tests.
sequenceDiagram
    autonumber
    participant Runner as GitHub Actions runner
    participant Node as Setup Node
    participant PNPM as pnpm install
    participant Cache as Cypress cache (~/​.cache/Cypress)
    participant Cypress as Cypress binary install
    participant Test as Test step (cypress run)

    Runner->>Node: setup-node (use node-version)
    Node-->>Runner: node available
    Runner->>PNPM: install dependencies (pnpm install)
    PNPM-->>Runner: dependencies installed
    Runner->>Cache: restore cache (key: OS + pnpm-lock.yaml hash)
    alt cache hit
        Cache-->>Runner: cache restored
    else cache miss
        Cache-->>Runner: no cache
    end
    Runner->>Cypress: install Cypress binary
    Cypress-->>Runner: binary installed (and possibly update cache)
    Runner->>Test: run tests (cypress)
    Test-->>Runner: test results
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

  • Review .github/workflows/main.yml for correctness of cache keys, path, and ordering.
  • Verify prepare script in package.json doesn't cause unexpected build side-effects during installs.
  • Confirm pnpm-related steps and Cypress binary install commands match repository expectations and secrets (if any).

Poem

🐇 I nibbled scripts beneath the tree,
A "prepare" hop for builds to be,
CI caches saved a sprightly cheer,
Cypress wakes — the tests appear! 🥕✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The PR title 'Add prepare to ensure dist is published' directly reflects the main change: adding a prepare script to package.json that runs 'pnpm build'.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch prepare

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/main.yml (1)

27-28: Verify necessity of explicit dependency install.

The setup-node action (line 26) already has cache: pnpm configured, which should automatically install dependencies. The explicit pnpm i step may be redundant.

If this step is intentional for clarity or to enforce explicit control over installation, consider adding a comment explaining why. Otherwise, you may remove it to streamline the workflow.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c91fe10 and c235029.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/main.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Tests
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/main.yml (3)

29-36: Cypress binary cache strategy is well-configured.

The cache configuration properly targets the Cypress binary cache location, uses a composite key (OS + lock file hash), and includes sensible restore-keys fallback. This should improve CI reliability and reduce Cypress installation time on subsequent runs.


37-38: Cypress binary installation properly sequenced.

The explicit pnpm exec cypress install ensures the Cypress binary is available after cache restore, with proper positioning before the test run. This complements the cache strategy and improves reliability.


1-49: Verify package.json prepare script implementation.

The PR title and AI summary indicate a prepare script was added to package.json ("prepare": "pnpm build"), but package.json is not included in this review. The prepare script would automatically execute when pnpm i runs (line 28), ensuring dist is built during dependency installation.

Please confirm that the package.json changes are included in this PR and that the prepare script is correctly implemented.

@RobbieTheWagner RobbieTheWagner merged commit b6b7a48 into master Dec 5, 2025
3 checks passed
@RobbieTheWagner RobbieTheWagner deleted the prepare branch December 5, 2025 15:11
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Dec 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants