Skip to content

Conversation

@samety
Copy link
Contributor

@samety samety commented Jun 24, 2021

@samety samety requested a review from cjw296 as a code owner June 24, 2021 19:02
@the-knights-who-say-ni
Copy link

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept this contribution by verifying everyone involved has signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

CLA Missing

Our records indicate the following people have not signed the CLA:

@samety

For legal reasons we need all the people listed to sign the CLA before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

If you have recently signed the CLA, please wait at least one business day
before our records are updated.

You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received.

Thanks again for the contribution, we look forward to reviewing it!

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 7, 2021

This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale Stale PR or inactive for long period of time. label Aug 7, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@MaxwellDupre MaxwellDupre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks ok for me.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale Stale PR or inactive for long period of time. label Aug 10, 2022
@cjw296
Copy link
Contributor

cjw296 commented Dec 27, 2022

Let's discuss more on #88351.

@cjw296 cjw296 linked an issue Jun 9, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
@cjw296 cjw296 self-requested a review June 9, 2023 13:25
Copy link
Contributor

@cjw296 cjw296 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please can you fix the docs failure coming from bad ReST in the NEWS entry.

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

@samety
Copy link
Contributor Author

samety commented Jun 9, 2023

I have made the requested changes; please review again

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

Thanks for making the requested changes!

@cjw296: please review the changes made to this pull request.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot requested a review from cjw296 June 9, 2023 18:12
@cjw296 cjw296 merged commit 3f7c081 into python:main Jun 11, 2023
@samety samety deleted the bugfix-issue-44185-mockopen-exit branch December 17, 2023 18:01
openstack-mirroring pushed a commit to openstack/python-glanceclient that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2025
Following a recent change in Python[1], mock_open now invokes close()
when used as a context manager. This causes some of our tests to fail.
This commit rewrites part of these tests to be less dependant on
internal Python details.

[1] python/cpython#26902

Change-Id: Iad9c0f0bf7f34d5cf209ec10863b28ddde281d7e
Signed-off-by: Cyril Roelandt <[email protected]>
openstack-mirroring pushed a commit to openstack/openstack that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2025
* Update python-glanceclient from branch 'master'
  to d46a9bff0071e13201892dba6f3e6f9d16487f6c
  - Python 3.13: fix tests
    
    Following a recent change in Python[1], mock_open now invokes close()
    when used as a context manager. This causes some of our tests to fail.
    This commit rewrites part of these tests to be less dependant on
    internal Python details.
    
    [1] python/cpython#26902
    
    Change-Id: Iad9c0f0bf7f34d5cf209ec10863b28ddde281d7e
    Signed-off-by: Cyril Roelandt <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

mock_open file handle __exit__ does not call close

6 participants