Skip to content

Conversation

@HorlogeSkynet
Copy link
Member

@HorlogeSkynet HorlogeSkynet commented Jul 29, 2021

While working on #264 (leading to #304), I noticed that the include_uname parameter is completely being ignored by the code base.
This PR addresses this issue and propose a new test to prevent future regression.

Bye 👋


EDIT : A quick GitHub search shows that "no one" (at least on this forge) actually uses this flag.


EDIT 2 : I can backport this patch to the python2.7-support branch if you're OK with that.

Closes #309

Copy link
Contributor

@sethmlarson sethmlarson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you!

@sethmlarson sethmlarson merged commit c613bdf into master Aug 15, 2021
@sethmlarson sethmlarson deleted the fix/include-uname_is_ignored branch August 15, 2021 15:08
@HorlogeSkynet
Copy link
Member Author

Backported to python2.7-support : e5f6a23.


@nir0s could you protect the branch mentioned above (as you did for python2.6-support) to prevent any spurious removal ? Many thanks 🙇

@HorlogeSkynet HorlogeSkynet added this to the 1.6.1 milestone Oct 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The include_uname argument is never used

3 participants