Skip to content

Conversation

@hiyuchang
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

As the title says.

Checklist

Please check the following items before code is ready to be reviewed.

  • Code has passed all tests
  • Docstrings have been added/updated in Google Style
  • Documentation has been updated
  • Code is ready for review

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @hiyuchang, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on enhancing the clarity and user guidance for path configurations within example YAML files. It modifies the dapo.yaml to provide a more direct placeholder for evaluation taskset paths and adds a descriptive comment to the dpo.yaml file, ensuring users can more easily understand and configure dataset locations.

Highlights

  • Configuration Path Clarity: The eval_tasksets path in examples/dapo_math/dapo.yaml has been updated to use a more explicit placeholder, /PATH/TO/AIME2024/, instead of an environment variable, making it clearer for users to specify the required path.
  • DPO Dataset Path Comment: A clarifying comment, # Path to the DPO dataset, was added to the path configuration in examples/dpo_humanlike/dpo.yaml to better explain the purpose of the TRINITY_TASKSET_PATH environment variable.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request aims to fix a path in the DAPO example configuration. While a helpful comment was added in dpo.yaml, the change in dapo.yaml replaces a flexible environment variable with a hardcoded placeholder path. This makes the example harder to use, and I've recommended reverting this specific change to maintain better configuration practices.

@hiyuchang hiyuchang changed the title Fix dapo eval_tasksets path Fix taskset and eval_tasksets path Nov 5, 2025
@hiyuchang
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/unittest-module-common

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 5, 2025

Summary

Tests 📝 Passed ✅ Failed ❌ Skipped ⏭️ Other ❓ Flaky 🍂 Duration ⏱️
33 33 0 0 0 0 4m 54s

Tests

Test Name Status Flaky Duration
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_all_examples_are_valid 40.5s
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_config_flatten 39ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_continue_from_checkpoint_is_valid 186ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_default_workflow 87ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_load_default_config 3.5s
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_max_token_len_per_gpu_set_correctly 89ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_update_config_from_ray_cluster 1.9s
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestEID::test_eid_properties 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_action_mask_and_logprobs_type 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_assertions 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_dpo_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_gather 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_hf_datasets_conversion 16ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_multi_turn_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_serialize_deserialize 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_single_turn_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_to_dict 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_batch_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_dpo_experience_batch_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_experience_model_experience_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_gather_experiences_with_custom_fields 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_multiturn_experience_batch_converstion 1ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_0::test_generate 51.5s
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_1::test_generate 32.8s
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_2::test_generate 42.4s
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestModelLen_0::test_model_len 17.4s
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestModelLen_1::test_model_len 16.9s
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAPIServer::test_api 22.6s
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAsyncAPIServer::test_api_async 22.4s
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestTokenizer::test_action_mask 269ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestTokenizer::test_action_mask_with_tools 246ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAPIServerToolCall_0_deepseek_r1::test_api_tool_calls 19.4s
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAPIServerToolCall_1::test_api_tool_calls 17.9s

Github Test Reporter by CTRF 💚

@pan-x-c
Copy link
Collaborator

pan-x-c commented Nov 5, 2025

/unittest-module-common

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 5, 2025

Summary

Tests 📝 Passed ✅ Failed ❌ Skipped ⏭️ Other ❓ Flaky 🍂 Duration ⏱️
33 33 0 0 0 0 5m 24s

Tests

Test Name Status Flaky Duration
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_all_examples_are_valid 41.1s
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_config_flatten 39ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_continue_from_checkpoint_is_valid 187ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_default_workflow 88ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_load_default_config 30.8s
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_max_token_len_per_gpu_set_correctly 91ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_update_config_from_ray_cluster 1.8s
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestEID::test_eid_properties 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_action_mask_and_logprobs_type 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_assertions 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_dpo_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_gather 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_hf_datasets_conversion 16ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_multi_turn_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_serialize_deserialize 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_single_turn_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_to_dict 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_batch_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_dpo_experience_batch_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_experience_model_experience_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_gather_experiences_with_custom_fields 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_multiturn_experience_batch_converstion 1ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_0::test_generate 52.2s
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_1::test_generate 32.0s
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_2::test_generate 43.0s
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestModelLen_0::test_model_len 17.5s
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestModelLen_1::test_model_len 17.5s
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAPIServer::test_api 22.5s
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAsyncAPIServer::test_api_async 23.3s
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestTokenizer::test_action_mask 257ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestTokenizer::test_action_mask_with_tools 269ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAPIServerToolCall_0_deepseek_r1::test_api_tool_calls 19.6s
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAPIServerToolCall_1::test_api_tool_calls 17.5s

Github Test Reporter by CTRF 💚

@pan-x-c pan-x-c merged commit c670d0a into modelscope:main Nov 5, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants