Skip to content

Conversation

@garyzhang99
Copy link
Collaborator

@garyzhang99 garyzhang99 commented Oct 9, 2025

Description

Calculating the mean at the local (group) level and the standard deviation at the global (batch) level enables more robust reward shaping(https://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.08221v1).

Ready to merge.
image

Checklist

Please check the following items before code is ready to be reviewed.

  • Code has passed all tests
  • Docstrings have been added/updated in Google Style
  • Documentation has been updated
  • Code is ready for review

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @garyzhang99, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the GRPO and Step-wise GRPO advantage functions by introducing an option to calculate the standard deviation for reward normalization at the batch level. Previously, standard deviation was computed per group. This new "batch" level calculation, while retaining group-level mean calculation, is based on recent research indicating improved robustness in reward shaping. The changes involve modifying the constructor and processing logic of the relevant advantage functions, along with updating the base abstract class and adding comprehensive unit tests to verify the new functionality.

Highlights

  • Batch-level Standard Deviation: Introduced a new "std_cal_level" parameter for GRPO and Step-wise GRPO advantage functions, allowing the standard deviation for reward normalization to be calculated across the entire batch of experiences, rather than per group.
  • Robust Reward Shaping: This change is motivated by recent research suggesting that calculating the mean at the local (group) level and the standard deviation at the global (batch) level leads to more robust reward shaping in reinforcement learning.
  • Core Logic Adaptation: Modified the GRPOAdvantage and MultiStepGRPOAdvantage classes to implement this new calculation logic, including passing precomputed batch standard deviation values to individual group advantage calculations.
  • Expanded Test Coverage: Added new unit tests (test_batch_level_std_grpo and test_batch_level_step_wise_grpo_advantage) to advantage_fn_test.py to specifically validate the correctness of the batch-level standard deviation calculation for both GRPO variants.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@garyzhang99
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/unittest-all

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a feature to calculate standard deviation at the batch level for reward normalization, which can lead to more robust reward shaping. The changes are implemented for GRPOAdvantage and StepWiseGRPOAdvantageFn, and new tests are added. My review found a few issues: a bug in one of the new tests, a minor inconsistency in grpo_advantage.py, and an opportunity for performance improvement in multi_step_grpo_advantage.py by avoiding redundant computations. I've provided suggestions to address these points.

@garyzhang99
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/unittest-module-algorithm

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2025

Summary

Tests 📝 Passed ✅ Failed ❌ Skipped ⏭️ Other ❓ Flaky 🍂 Duration ⏱️
13 13 0 0 0 0 4ms

Tests

Test Name Status Flaky Duration
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_batch_level_std_grpo 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_batch_level_step_wise_grpo_advantage 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_duplicate_grpo 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_grpo_advantage 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_grpo_correct_bias 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_grpo_reward_std 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_step_wise_grpo_advantage 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_dpo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_gspo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_mix_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_opmd_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_ppo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_sft_policy_loss 1ms

Github Test Reporter by CTRF 💚

@garyzhang99
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/unittest-module-algorithm

@github-actions
Copy link

Summary

Tests 📝 Passed ✅ Failed ❌ Skipped ⏭️ Other ❓ Flaky 🍂 Duration ⏱️
13 12 1 0 0 0 4ms

Failed Tests

Failed Tests ❌ Fail Message
❌ tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_step_wise_grpo_advantage The test failed in the call phase

Tests

Test Name Status Flaky Duration
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_batch_level_std_grpo 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_batch_level_step_wise_grpo_advantage 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_duplicate_grpo 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_grpo_advantage 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_grpo_correct_bias 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_grpo_reward_std 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_step_wise_grpo_advantage 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_dpo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_gspo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_mix_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_opmd_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_ppo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_sft_policy_loss 1ms

Github Test Reporter by CTRF 💚

@garyzhang99
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/unittest-module-algorithm

@github-actions
Copy link

Summary

Tests 📝 Passed ✅ Failed ❌ Skipped ⏭️ Other ❓ Flaky 🍂 Duration ⏱️
13 13 0 0 0 0 4ms

Tests

Test Name Status Flaky Duration
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_batch_level_std_grpo 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_batch_level_step_wise_grpo_advantage 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_duplicate_grpo 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_grpo_advantage 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_grpo_correct_bias 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_grpo_reward_std 1ms
tests/algorithm/advantage_fn_test.py::TestGroupedAdvantageFn::test_step_wise_grpo_advantage 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_dpo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_gspo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_mix_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_opmd_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_ppo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_sft_policy_loss 1ms

Github Test Reporter by CTRF 💚

@garyzhang99 garyzhang99 changed the title [WIP]Add batch level std calculation Add batch level std calculation Oct 13, 2025
@pan-x-c pan-x-c merged commit e29bd29 into modelscope:main Oct 15, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants