Skip to content

Conversation

@pan-x-c
Copy link
Collaborator

@pan-x-c pan-x-c commented Sep 26, 2025

Description

[Please describe the background, purpose, changes made, and how to test this PR]

Checklist

Please check the following items before code is ready to be reviewed.

  • Code has passed all tests
  • Docstrings have been added/updated in Google Style
  • Documentation has been updated
  • Code is ready for review

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @pan-x-c, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refactors and expands the workflow examples by integrating the AgentScope framework, specifically demonstrating the use of its ReAct agent. It provides a structured approach to defining agent behaviors, handling responses, and calculating rewards for various tasks, starting with a concrete example for mathematical problem-solving.

Highlights

  • New AgentScope Integration: Introduces a dedicated directory and classes for integrating AgentScope workflows into the Trinity-RFT system.
  • ReAct Agent Implementation: Adds the AgentScopeReActAgent class, which wraps AgentScope's ReAct agent, enabling structured responses via Pydantic models and dynamic tool calling.
  • ReAct Workflow Example: Implements AgentScopeReActWorkflow to demonstrate how to use the ReAct agent within the Trinity-RFT system, including task solving, reward calculation, and experience construction.
  • Task-Specific Templates: Introduces a templating system for different task types, with an initial implementation for the GSM8K math problem-solving task, defining system prompts, response structures, and reward functions.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new workflow for AgentScope's ReAct agent. The implementation is well-structured, with clear separation of the agent wrapper, the workflow logic, and task-specific templates. I've identified a few issues, including a critical bug that would cause a runtime error during reward calculation, a potential crash if a task template is not found, and some incorrect type hints that affect code clarity and correctness. My suggestions aim to fix these issues and improve the robustness and maintainability of the new workflow.

Copy link
Collaborator

@yanxi-chen yanxi-chen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some inline comments for readme

Copy link
Collaborator

@yanxi-chen yanxi-chen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some minor comments, otherwise lgtm

@pan-x-c
Copy link
Collaborator Author

pan-x-c commented Sep 28, 2025

/gemini review

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request is a significant and well-executed refactoring of the AgentScope ReAct agent workflow example. The changes introduce a more modular and cleaner structure by creating a dedicated AgentScopeReActWorkflow with its own agent wrapper and task templates. This greatly improves the clarity and maintainability of the example. The documentation has also been substantially updated to reflect these changes, making it much easier for developers to understand and adapt. The addition of supporting features like get_model_path in the model classes is a logical enhancement. Overall, this is an excellent improvement. I have a few suggestions to fix a bug and improve the documentation's accuracy.

@pan-x-c
Copy link
Collaborator Author

pan-x-c commented Sep 28, 2025

/unittest-module-common

@github-actions
Copy link

Summary

Tests 📝 Passed ✅ Failed ❌ Skipped ⏭️ Other ❓ Flaky 🍂 Duration ⏱️
30 30 0 0 0 0 316ms

Tests

Test Name Status Flaky Duration
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_all_examples_are_valid 34ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_config_flatten 1ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_continue_from_checkpoint_is_valid 1ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_load_default_config 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestEID::test_eid_properties 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_action_mask_and_logprobs_type 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_assertions 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_dpo_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_gather 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_hf_datasets_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_multi_turn_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_serialize_deserialize 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_single_turn_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_to_dict 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_batch_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_dpo_experience_batch_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_experience_model_experience_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_gather_experiences_with_custom_fields 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_multiturn_experience_batch_converstion 1ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_0::test_generate 58ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_1::test_generate 37ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_2::test_generate 46ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestModelLen_0::test_model_len 21ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestModelLen_1::test_model_len 20ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAPIServer::test_api 24ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAsyncAPIServer::test_api_async 24ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestTokenizer::test_action_mask 1ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestTokenizer::test_action_mask_with_tools 1ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAPIServerToolCall_0_deepseek_r1::test_api_tool_calls 22ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAPIServerToolCall_1::test_api_tool_calls 20ms

Github Test Reporter by CTRF 💚

@yanxi-chen yanxi-chen merged commit ee71226 into modelscope:main Sep 28, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants