-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
Refactor AgentScope ReAct Agent workflow example #303
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor AgentScope ReAct Agent workflow example #303
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @pan-x-c, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refactors and expands the workflow examples by integrating the AgentScope framework, specifically demonstrating the use of its ReAct agent. It provides a structured approach to defining agent behaviors, handling responses, and calculating rewards for various tasks, starting with a concrete example for mathematical problem-solving. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new workflow for AgentScope's ReAct agent. The implementation is well-structured, with clear separation of the agent wrapper, the workflow logic, and task-specific templates. I've identified a few issues, including a critical bug that would cause a runtime error during reward calculation, a potential crash if a task template is not found, and some incorrect type hints that affect code clarity and correctness. My suggestions aim to fix these issues and improve the robustness and maintainability of the new workflow.
yanxi-chen
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some inline comments for readme
yanxi-chen
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some minor comments, otherwise lgtm
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request is a significant and well-executed refactoring of the AgentScope ReAct agent workflow example. The changes introduce a more modular and cleaner structure by creating a dedicated AgentScopeReActWorkflow with its own agent wrapper and task templates. This greatly improves the clarity and maintainability of the example. The documentation has also been substantially updated to reflect these changes, making it much easier for developers to understand and adapt. The addition of supporting features like get_model_path in the model classes is a logical enhancement. Overall, this is an excellent improvement. I have a few suggestions to fix a bug and improve the documentation's accuracy.
|
/unittest-module-common |
Summary
Tests
Github Test Reporter by CTRF 💚 |
Description
[Please describe the background, purpose, changes made, and how to test this PR]
Checklist
Please check the following items before code is ready to be reviewed.