Skip to content

Conversation

@chenyushuo
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

  1. Update config manager for 0.3.0
  2. Fix in load_plugin.

Checklist

Please check the following items before code is ready to be reviewed.

  • Code has passed all tests
  • Docstrings have been added/updated in Google Style
  • Documentation has been updated
  • Code is ready for review

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @chenyushuo, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily updates the configuration management system to align with the upcoming 0.3.0 release, focusing on expanding support for advanced distributed training strategies and improving the overall configurability of the system. It integrates plugin loading more robustly and refines various training-related parameters, making the configuration process more flexible and comprehensive.

Highlights

  • Configuration Manager Update: Significant enhancements to the configuration manager to support new distributed training strategies (FSDP2, Megatron) with detailed options for offloading, parallelization, and recomputation. This includes adding new configurable parameters for model training and refining existing ones.
  • Plugin Loading Integration: The load_plugins() function is now explicitly called early in the application's run function and within the ConfigManager initialization, ensuring proper discovery and loading of plugins.
  • Training Parameter Refinements: Adjustments were made to the calculation and validation of train_batch_size, and new model parameters such as max_prompt_tokens and min_response_tokens have been introduced for finer control over model behavior.
  • Code Cleanup and Simplification: Deprecated elements like the MonitorType enum have been removed, the save_interval logic has been simplified, and several unused or redundant configuration options have been streamlined.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces significant updates to the configuration manager, adding support for new training strategies like fsdp2 and megatron, and refactoring the configuration generation logic. It also aims to fix plugin loading. My review identifies a critical issue in the plugin loading implementation, a potential risk in how configurations for different training strategies are combined, and a user interface improvement to avoid confusion. Addressing these points will enhance the robustness and usability of the new features.

@chenyushuo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/unittest-module-utils

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 8, 2025

Summary

Tests 📝 Passed ✅ Failed ❌ Skipped ⏭️ Other ❓ Flaky 🍂 Duration ⏱️
18 18 0 0 0 0 21ms

Tests

Test Name Status Flaky Duration
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestComputeScore::test_both_boxed_and_equivalent 1ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestComputeScore::test_both_boxed_and_not_equivalent 1ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestComputeScore::test_empty_ground_truth 1ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestComputeScore::test_empty_solution_string 1ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestComputeScore::test_multiple_boxed_answers_in_solution 1ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestComputeScore::test_solution_boxed_truth_raw_and_equivalent 1ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestComputeScore::test_solution_boxed_truth_raw_and_not_equivalent 1ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestComputeScore::test_solution_not_boxed 1ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestComputeScore::test_solution_raw_and_ground_truth_boxed_equivalent 1ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestMathEvalUtils::test_extract_answer 1ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestMathEvalUtils::test_verify_math_answer 1ms
tests/utils/eval_utils_test.py::TestEvalUtils::test_is_equiv 1ms
tests/utils/log_test.py::LogTest::test_actor_log 5ms
tests/utils/log_test.py::LogTest::test_group_by_node 1ms
tests/utils/log_test.py::LogTest::test_no_actor_log 1ms
tests/utils/plugin_test.py::TestPluginLoader::test_load_plugins_local 1ms
tests/utils/plugin_test.py::TestPluginLoader::test_load_plugins_remote 6ms
tests/utils/plugin_test.py::TestPluginLoader::test_passing_custom_class 3ms

Github Test Reporter by CTRF 💚

@chenyushuo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/unittest-module-common

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 8, 2025

Summary

Tests 📝 Passed ✅ Failed ❌ Skipped ⏭️ Other ❓ Flaky 🍂 Duration ⏱️
31 31 0 0 0 0 337ms

Tests

Test Name Status Flaky Duration
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_all_examples_are_valid 4ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_config_flatten 1ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_continue_from_checkpoint_is_valid 1ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_load_default_config 4ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestEID::test_eid_properties 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_action_mask_and_logprobs_type 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_assertions 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_dpo_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_gather 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_hf_datasets_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_multi_turn_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_serialize_deserialize 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_single_turn_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_to_dict 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_batch_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_dpo_experience_batch_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_experience_model_experience_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_gather_experiences_with_custom_fields 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_multiturn_experience_batch_converstion 1ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_0::test_generate 38ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_1::test_generate 16ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_2::test_generate 16ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_3::test_generate 53ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_4::test_generate 49ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_5::test_generate 36ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_6::test_generate 45ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAPIServer::test_api 24ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestTokenizer::test_action_mask 1ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestTokenizer::test_action_mask_with_tools 1ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAPIServerToolCall_0_deepseek_r1::test_api_tool_calls 22ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAPIServerToolCall_1::test_api_tool_calls 20ms

Github Test Reporter by CTRF 💚

@pan-x-c pan-x-c merged commit c44be19 into modelscope:main Sep 8, 2025
1 check passed
yaochaorui pushed a commit to yaochaorui/Trinity-RFT that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants