-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
Bug fix in Synchronizer #171
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @chenyushuo, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
I've addressed a bug in the Synchronizer class related to concurrency and asynchronous operations. My changes primarily focus on ensuring thread safety for shared state, converting synchronous methods to asynchronous ones where appropriate, and updating their call sites to correctly await their execution. This improves the robustness and responsiveness of the Synchronizer's module tracking and status update mechanisms.
Highlights
- Concurrency Control: I've implemented an
asyncio.Lockto ensure thread-safe operations on the_modulesset, preventing potential race conditions when modules are added or checked. - Asynchronous Method Conversion: I've converted key methods like
add_moduleandset_explorer_status, along with the nestedsync_failedfunction, to be asynchronous. This ensures properawaiting of these operations and aligns with theasyncioframework. - Await Call Updates: I've updated all call sites for the newly asynchronous
set_explorer_statusandsync_failedfunctions to correctlyawaittheir execution. - Performance Optimization: I've optimized the
_check_modulesloop by reducing the sleep interval from 5 seconds to 1 second, which should make the module checking more responsive. - Ray Actor Interaction Correction: I've adjusted the
get_actormethod to remove theray.getcall foradd_module, asadd_moduleis now anasyncmethod and doesn't require blocking retrieval of its remote execution result.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
|
Warning Gemini encountered an error creating the review. You can try again by commenting |
|
/gemini review |
|
/unittest-all |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request primarily refactors the Synchronizer by moving it into a manager package, which is a good organizational improvement. The changes also address a bug in the Synchronizer's lifecycle management by introducing a lock for concurrent access to its tracked modules and improve exception handling for async iterators by correctly using StopAsyncIteration.
My review highlights a few areas for improvement:
- Test Robustness: A polling loop in a test should have a timeout to prevent it from hanging.
- Concurrency: A minor race condition in the
Synchronizer'sadd_modulemethod should be addressed. - Code Clarity: A leftover debug string in a docstring should be removed.
Overall, these are solid changes that enhance the codebase's structure and robustness. Addressing the feedback will further improve the quality of the code.
|
/unittest-all |
Summary
Tests
Github Test Reporter by CTRF 💚 |
Description
As the title says.
Checklist
Please check the following items before code is ready to be reviewed.