feat: Add support for listing and restoring Flatpak applications.#101
Open
hthienloc wants to merge 1 commit intolinuxmint:masterfrom
Open
feat: Add support for listing and restoring Flatpak applications.#101hthienloc wants to merge 1 commit intolinuxmint:masterfrom
hthienloc wants to merge 1 commit intolinuxmint:masterfrom
Conversation
Open
|
I tested this new commit on my machine and I did not find any issues. Flatpaks were included in the output list file and then were able to be restored along with system packages. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR brings several related changes:
flatpak listfor installed apps.fp:…entries in package lists and handle them specially._install_flatpaks, etc.) to install Flatpaks during restore.The feature has been tested locally: backups now include Flatpaks and restore correctly, and the UI remains responsive.
Why?
#98 #99