Skip to content

Conversation

@iamqizhao
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@bufdev
Copy link
Contributor

bufdev commented Apr 19, 2016

I assume the discussion on chaining interceptors is officially over? :)

@bufdev
Copy link
Contributor

bufdev commented Apr 19, 2016

It would be just as easy to allow multiple interceptors, and if there are >1 interceptors when you parse the options for the server, combine all the interceptors into one with a wrapper interceptors that calls all the given interceptors in order, this satisfies everyone

@iamqizhao
Copy link
Contributor Author

chaining is left to contrib/ or the applications themselves. :)

@menghanl menghanl merged commit 1a59283 into grpc:master Apr 20, 2016
@bufdev
Copy link
Contributor

bufdev commented Apr 20, 2016

Why can't we do it here if it's so super super easy? It will mean more fragmentation if we don't

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 20, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants