Consider using "TimeUnit.<unit>.sleep(x)" for code examples

In most code examples given (both in GitHub & official docs) where a sleep is needed, then Thread.sleep(x) is used. For example:

For better readability/clarity, then it may be prudent to consider using the TimeUnit class instead. Yes, it's all the same as it calls Thread.sleep(x) under the hood, but consider the following as an example:

Thread.sleep(180000) vs. TimeUnit.MINUTES.sleep(3)

More info: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9587673/thread-sleep-vs-timeunit-seconds-sleep

Better not to include sleep in the samples, unless we expect users to use it as well. Instead put them in the tests for those samples.

However, if you really most use sleep, then this probably should be preferred.

The feature request is added to the backlog. The issue will be closed but is linked in the backlog and can continue to be used for comment and discussion.