Skip to content

Conversation

@sgallagher
Copy link
Collaborator

If we wanted to switch to hatch[ling], this could be a start for that.

Note: this is quick-and-dirty and minimally-tested.

@sgallagher sgallagher requested a review from FrostyX March 24, 2025 14:54
Copy link
Collaborator

@TomasTomecek TomasTomecek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 to switch to hatch if it makes our packaging work easier

Copy link
Member

@FrostyX FrostyX left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the change @sgallagher,
I tried to build an RPM package based around this change, and it worked fine (apart from a few minor hiccups that I am pointing out in my review)

The only reason why I wanted to stay with Poetry was that we already had it, so it was easier to keep it than getting rid of it. Since you already proposed this PR, it is +1 from me.

@FrostyX
Copy link
Member

FrostyX commented Mar 24, 2025

Two things to point out.

  • I only tried building the package, not actually using it.
  • Please see git grep poetry. We also need to change all of those

@sgallagher
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Two things to point out.

* I only tried building the package, not actually using it.

So, no different from anything that Google ships, then? (I'll see myself out)

* Please see `git grep poetry`. We also need to change all of those

Yeah, I'll take a look.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Gallagher <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants