remove resource counts from monitor deletion modal#7389
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
1 Skipped Deployment
|
Contributor
Greptile OverviewGreptile SummaryRemoved the Key changes:
The change improves UX by providing clear, accurate information about deletion impact without potentially confusing numeric details. Confidence Score: 5/5
Important Files Changed
Last reviewed commit: 3864538 |
adamsachs
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ticket ENG-1192 followup
Description Of Changes
Per discussion referenced in the jira comment here, these resources counts ultimately just add confusion for the end user, so we're deciding to hide it.
Code Changes
Steps to Confirm
Pre-Merge Checklist
CHANGELOG.mdupdatedmaindowngrade()migration is correct and works