Skip to content

Conversation

@thaJeztah
Copy link
Member


  • fix various unhandled errors
  • remove some locally defined option-types in favor of option-types defined by the client / api
  • don't use unkeyed structs in tests, and add docs for some subtests
  • fix some values in tests that triggered "spellcheck" warnings
  • inline vars / functions that only had a single use.

(cherry picked from commit c6f935e)

- What I did

- How I did it

- How to verify it

- Human readable description for the release notes

- A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

- fix various unhandled errors
- remove some locally defined option-types in favor of option-types
  defined by the client / api
- don't use unkeyed structs in tests, and add docs for some subtests
- fix some values in tests that triggered "spellcheck" warnings
- inline vars / functions that only had a single use.

Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit c6f935e)
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <[email protected]>
@thaJeztah thaJeztah added this to the 28.4.0 milestone Aug 22, 2025
@thaJeztah thaJeztah added status/2-code-review kind/refactor PR's that refactor, or clean-up code labels Aug 22, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 81.08108% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
cli/command/plugin/push.go 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
cli/command/plugin/upgrade.go 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
cli/command/plugin/set.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@thaJeztah thaJeztah merged commit b52ab17 into docker:28.x Aug 22, 2025
94 checks passed
@thaJeztah thaJeztah deleted the 28.x_backport_cleanup_plugins branch August 22, 2025 09:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

kind/refactor PR's that refactor, or clean-up code status/2-code-review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants