Skip to content

Conversation

@pradeepgv-db
Copy link
Contributor

Replace legacy start api in favor of updates api in databricks cli.

@pradeepgv-db pradeepgv-db requested a review from enzam-db August 30, 2022 05:39
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 30, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 70.04% // Head: 70.04% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (c47a7fe) compared to base (375af9d).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #553   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   70.04%   70.04%           
=======================================
  Files          55       55           
  Lines        4731     4731           
=======================================
  Hits         3314     3314           
  Misses       1417     1417           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@pradeepgv-db pradeepgv-db requested a review from anew August 31, 2022 17:56
@pradeepgv-db
Copy link
Contributor Author

jenkins merge

@pradeepgv-db
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mukulmurthy could you help with merging this in?

@pietern pietern changed the title [SC-109169] Replace legacy start api in favor of updates api Replace legacy start api in favor of updates api Sep 1, 2022
@pietern pietern merged commit 64c370f into databricks:main Sep 1, 2022
@pietern
Copy link
Contributor

pietern commented Sep 1, 2022

@pradeepgv-db You can ping me for following changes.

@mukulmurthy
Copy link
Collaborator

I was on-call and am just catching up on emails now. Was prioritizing code reviews, but I guess I didn't have docs PRs tagged with the right label. Sorry for the delay!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants