You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for your great work! However, I have trouble when reproducing your reported results in your paper (i.e., Table 2 and 4). Therefore, I have some questions and I hope you can help me solve them.
According to the README file, two checkpoints are provided, one fine-tuned from SD 2-1 and one for SD1-5. I wonder which one you utilize to report the results in your paper.
According to configs/cocostuff_SD2_1.json and configs/cocostuff_SD1_5.json, it seems that you are actually fine-tuning and generating images on 512x512 resolutions instead of 256x256, which is different from your settings in your paper. Moreover, even if I utilize the generated 512x512 using the SD2-1 checkpoint, I cannot get the FID value reported in your paper (I got 22+ FID using the fid_eval.py script). Would you mind providing the exact code settings to reproduce the results in your paper?
Hi, you need to run the evaluation on the generated image tensor (you can save them by using pickle). We have noticed that when saved to jpg the FID score will be higher.
Activity
cplusx commentedon Jun 15, 2023
Hi, you need to run the evaluation on the generated image tensor (you can save them by using pickle). We have noticed that when saved to jpg the FID score will be higher.