Skip to content

docs: correct Cat Jam Free data policy - #55224

Merged
opencode-agent[bot] merged 3 commits into
devfrom
docs-cat-jam-free-retention
Oct 14, 2026
Merged

opencode-agent[bot] merged 3 commits into
devfrom
docs-cat-jam-free-retention

Conversation

@opencode-agent

@opencode-agent opencode-agent Bot commented Oct 13, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Corrects the Cat Jam Free data policy in the Console docs. Its provider does not train on your data, but it is not ZDR: data is retained for 30 days for safety reasons.

  • console/go.mdx: in the Privacy table, Cat Jam Free now shows model training "Not used" and data retention "30 days". The outdated note saying collected data may be used to improve the model is removed.
  • console/models.mdx (Zen):
    • The free models entry now says the provider does not use your data for model training and retains it for 30 days for safety reasons.
    • The Privacy section says all providers are zero-retention except those listed, so Cat Jam Free is now added to that exception list.

Requested by: @Slickstef11 (Stefan via Slack)

@opencode-agent opencode-agent Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The new wording is fine on its own, but it leaves the docs contradicting themselves about Cat Jam Free's data policy. I checked by reading the diff and every other Cat Jam Free mention in the docs; this is docs-only, so there was nothing to run. Public API is unchanged.

  • console/go.mdx still gives the old policy. In the Go privacy table (line 478), Cat Jam Free is listed with training Yes and Not ZDR. The note on line 485 says "During its free period, collected data may be used to improve the model." Both conflict with "not used for training". Please update them in this PR so both pages agree.
  • The Privacy section of models.mdx doesn't list Cat Jam Free. It says all providers are zero-retention "with the following exceptions". Since Cat Jam Free's data is now said to be retained under a safety policy, it should be on that list. The new sentence is phrased like those entries (compare the Mistral one), so it probably belongs there. The Free models entry could keep its "stealth model that's free on OpenCode for a limited time" wording, which this change drops.

- Big Pickle is a stealth model that's free on OpenCode for a limited time. The team is using this time to collect feedback and improve the model.
- Space Bunny Free is a stealth model that's free on OpenCode for a limited time. Its provider follows a zero-retention policy and does not use your data for model training.
- Cat Jam Free is a stealth model that's free on OpenCode for a limited time. The team is using this time to collect feedback and improve the model.
- Cat Jam Free: Prompts and other inputs are not used for training. Data is retained in accordance to their safety policy.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is phrased like the entries in the ## Privacy exceptions list further down (compare the Mistral line), but Cat Jam Free isn't listed there. Data that is "retained in accordance to their safety policy" isn't zero-retention, so it should be in that list. go.mdx (lines 478 and 485) still says Cat Jam Free's data may be used for training, which contradicts this line, so please update it too. With no provider named, "their safety policy" also doesn't point to anything a reader can look up.

@opencode-agent opencode-agent Bot changed the title docs: update Cat Jam Free data policy docs: mark Cat Jam Free as zero retention Oct 13, 2026
@opencode-agent
opencode-agent Bot force-pushed the docs-cat-jam-free-retention branch from b02eb34 to f5d5160 Compare October 13, 2026 23:21
@opencode-agent opencode-agent Bot changed the title docs: mark Cat Jam Free as zero retention docs: correct Cat Jam Free data policy Oct 14, 2026
@opencode-agent
opencode-agent Bot force-pushed the docs-cat-jam-free-retention branch from f5d5160 to 4fd4b42 Compare October 14, 2026 00:04
@opencode-agent
opencode-agent Bot merged commit d2cedff into dev Oct 14, 2026
11 checks passed
@opencode-agent
opencode-agent Bot deleted the docs-cat-jam-free-retention branch October 14, 2026 00:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant