Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Here Comes the Party
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 06:19, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Here Comes the Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
the article is completely unsourced and have been trying for a while to find reliable enough sources as was trying to include it in the bands FLC discography. cannot be reliably proved that they were actually released ep's or just leaked demos. Mister sparky (talk) 14:40, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related pages because of the same reason:
- Para Todas las Putas Celosas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- The Fake Sound of Progress (EP) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Delete per WP:NSONGS; the band is notable, but this release has no
reliablesources at all. - "In general, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia. Demos, mixtapes, bootlegs, promo-only, and unreleased albums are in general not notable; however, they may be notable if they have significant independent coverage in reliable sources --Scythre (talk) 14:54, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. No reliable sources. No chart history. Fails WP:MUSIC. Nouse4aname (talk) 14:58, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, article fails to establish notability per WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 12:21, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There are not any sources, and there wasn't a notable label backing it; it probably wasn't the reason they got signed, either. Heck, why is there a reflist template if there aren't any references at all? Oy vey. BacktableSpeak to Meabout what I have done 03:15, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.