User talk:Seamal987

I am not a paid editor. I am a volunteer who wants to help this museum

I disagree with you

Thses small paragraphs about each fighters give the audience a little appreciation about what they will see when they visit the museum specially that most people don't know that much about the history of these fighters in the Saudi Air Force. I did not wite too much about the fighters, they were just a little bit of history and I intend to do the same with each fighter in the museum Seamal987 (talk) 06:53, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you shed some light on hiring spammers to edit Royal Saudi Air Force Museum‎ for promotional purpose? GSS ^💬 07:09, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I seriously can't shed some light on that. Who do you think I am the Cia director? Seamal987 (talk) 12:06, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Look! This is unacceptable and accusatory based on racist reasons. Another Thing, why did you mess with code? This is vandalism. You need to shed some light on many things! You are the vandalist and you are the accuser. Seamal987 (talk) 12:11, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Saudi Air Force Museum

Stop adding in information about the F-15 in RSAF service, it does not belong on the Royal Saudi Air Force Museum page. As previously advised it should go on the Royal Saudi Air Force page if anywhere. Also stop calling people who revert your changes vandals. Mztourist (talk) 03:14, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that as per off-wiki evidence there is a case of undisclosed paid editing. GSS ^💬 03:35, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have explained this to you already, but you persist in adding irrelevant information on Royal Saudi Air Force Museum. This is your final warning. Stop edit warring this. Mztourist (talk) 14:22, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Seamal987 reported by User:GSS (Result: ). Thank you. GSS ^💬 14:28, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please refrain from editing the page till a judgement has been made. Aaryan33056 (talk) 15:36, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Royal Saudi Air Force Museum shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GSS ^💬 15:37, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GSS and two others do not want to edit the page. The keep reverting everything without adding, deleting, or discussing their issues. Reverting to scratch is not conducive nor constructive. The three-rule policy was used in a bad faith and he had never informed me of. they are constantly reverting my entire work that I had spent hours creating.

See WP:BRD: YOur poor edits have been challenged, now instead of digging a hole it's time to discuss it on the talk page instead of making accusations. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:15, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is your problem with the topic. What you did not like?

The problem with you edits, as has been pointed out a couple of times, is that they do not adhere by Wikipedia neutrality standards (this is an encyclopedia, not a puff piece in a newspaper). Also, if you haven't noticed, much of the content you are adding seems to be irrelevant to the Museum itself (it's about the F-15...) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:28, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Everything I added is coming from scientific publications. You can look at the references and see who wrote these stories. Theses snippets are meant to allow the visitors to appreciate what they see. I only added stories about fighters in the museum. You can add or suggest anything

The New York Times is not a scientific publication; and neither are the others. In any case, as I said, the section about "History of F-15 with Royal Saudi Air Force" seems hardly relevant to the museum. If some of this information is not already in F-15 or Royal Saudi Air Force it could be added there, in a short and concise fashion. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 17:01, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The NYT is an authoritative source besides the Aviation News. I told you these small snippets are intended to allow the visitors appreciate the content of the museum

Yes, but that information is not about the museum. It is about the F-15; and anyway Wikipedia is not a travel/museum guide so there's absolutely no reason to include this in this fashion... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 17:18, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:25, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: History of F-15s with Royal Saudi Air Force (August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:History of F-15s with Royal Saudi Air Force and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:History of F-15s with Royal Saudi Air Force, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 01:04, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Seamal987! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chris Troutman (talk) 01:04, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:History of F-15s with Royal Saudi Air Force

Hello, Seamal987. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "History of F-15s with Royal Saudi Air Force".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:14, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]