User talk:FiredanceThroughTheNight

SEMI-RETIRED

This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

Nomination of Day Above Ground for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Day Above Ground is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Day Above Ground until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donnie Park (talk) 17:39, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Twelve Tribes article

Hi. Saw your note about the edits. Please feel free to improve or edit. I was just trying to freshen the page. I'm kind of inexperienced with editing articles -- I hope I can still contribute, even if my changes need to be submitted so that my involvement is managed. I'm not paid to edit, but I'd really like the article to be as accurate as possible. I understand and respect NPOV and the need for verifiable sources. Tim Kroehler (talk) 01:58, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hyperdispensationalism may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:31, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chuck Missler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vatican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Orthodox Christianity in Guatemala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mayan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Westboro Baptist Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Theosis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eugene McCarthy (biologist)

The article Eugene McCarthy (biologist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This person is notable for his blog. Having a PhD and compiling some additions to the blog such as a section that he calls "One of the most popular dictionaries of biological and medical terminology on the Internet" doesn't give one a free "notability" pass on wikipedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 19:01, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eugene McCarthy (biologist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eugene McCarthy (biologist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugene McCarthy (biologist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 01:38, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Refugees of the Syrian Civil War may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

broy_bezhantsi-205975.html|title=МВР: До няколко дни ще достигнем максимумът брой бежанци (Ministry of the Interior: Maximum number of refugees will be reached in a few days|publisher=
|<100 (December 2013)<ref name="usacbs">http://www.cbsnews.com/news/winter-snow-storm-slams-syria-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:37, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Israeli–Palestinian peace talks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jordan Valley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DUE

Please make yourself familiar with eh WP:WEIGHT policy before you add smaller groups to the infobox. There was a consensus to not include groups with only a few thousand members; you can find such discussions throughout the talk page. Pass a Method talk 10:07, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Syrian civil war infobox. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Pass a Method talk 10:08, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013-2014 Israeli–Palestinian peace talks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Labor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion

Dear Sir,

I have tried my best to write this article from a neutral third party perspective. What is your opinion? --C.Z. Lee (talk) 06:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Legal status of Alaska, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andreas Osiander, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Theosis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Dear FiredanceThroughTheNight, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, especially your recent creation of Manosphere. Keep up the good work! With regards, Anupam^Talk 01:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manosphere, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anti-gay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quick message

I just wanted to say that I really admire your efforts in creating Manosphere. I made some edits to make the tone more neutral but I think it's good work --31.205.21.96 (talk) 00:59, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2014 Las Vegas police shooting

I can see you moved the article, which was a good idea. Just that the title is ambiguous as it may imply that it was a police shooting rather than policemen shot at. Also, there was a third civilian casualty. I'd suggest you move it to "2104 Las Vegas shooting" which will make the title neutral, and accurate. Cwobeel (talk) 22:20, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nipster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harlem Shake. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Patristics

added a link pointing to Coptic

Unicorn

added a link pointing to Horn

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Jihadism and hip-hop

Hello! Your submission of Jihadism and hip-hop at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Drmies (talk) 02:59, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jihadism and hip-hop, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gangsta and Al-Shabaab. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ted Cruz In Defense of Christians controversy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fellowship. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ted Cruz In Defense of Christians controversy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ted Cruz In Defense of Christians controversy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Cruz In Defense of Christians controversy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 17:51, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Manning wig.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Manning wig.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:02, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Silicon Valley secessionism for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Silicon Valley secessionism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silicon Valley secessionism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Orange Mike | Talk 23:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced, removed

This unsourced passage added last year has been removed. Prhartcom (talk) 13:23, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Blackmadammug.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Blackmadammug.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 21:18, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Black Madam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mario (singer). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Team Swandog

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Team Swandog requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — foxj 15:41, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Transethnic

The article Transethnic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be a non-notable neologism. Quick search on google news brought up no reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pishcal — ♣ 19:34, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Satanism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page S&M. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Howard Schneider (Florida dentist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Howard Schneider (Florida dentist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howard Schneider (Florida dentist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:10, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Dongfangzhixing) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Dongfangzhixing, FiredanceThroughTheNight!

Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please check if all the categories I added are correct.

To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Rick Perry undone

Hi there, I undid the Rick Perry addition to candidates because we generally want to wait until the official announcement (ie. press conference) because technically nothing on the web site launched this morning actually declares Perry is running. Huffington Post kind of jumps the gun on this one, compared to the more careful wording of CNN, NY Times, etc. Thanks. -- Fuzheado | Talk 12:06, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sigurd Legion for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sigurd Legion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigurd Legion until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:15, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Limberbutt McCubbins for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Limberbutt McCubbins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limberbutt McCubbins until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Agtx (talk) 17:05, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pet anus cover for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pet anus cover is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pet anus cover until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:42, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello, I'm Winkelvi. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Jared Fogle seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 01:16, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kenn Gividen

An article that you have been involved in editing, Kenn Gividen, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenn Gividen (2nd nomination). Thank you.--JayJasper (talk) 21:34, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Not Gay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Circle jerk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bassanorumor.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bassanorumor.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:19, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Incels

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Incels, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fyddlestix (talk) 02:26, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Incels

AfD. Valoem ^talk ^contrib 00:04, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Death of Lucas Leonard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Voodoo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Death of Lucas Leonard

Hello! Your submission of Death of Lucas Leonard at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:42, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on DYK nomination template. Yoninah (talk) 02:14, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Involuntary celibacy

I planned on DRVing this discussion soon. I've expanded some sources from the other article is there any other sources you could find? Valoem ^talk ^contrib 22:07, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wolves of Vinland

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wolves of Vinland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 03:58, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Donovan

Please talk to Jack, if you're in communication with him via Facebook, or whatever. Thank you. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 20:41, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help on Heathenry (new religious movement) and Odinism

Hello. I noticed your recent edit (reversed by vandal). Given your interest, could you help us with Heathenry (new religious movement) and Odinism?

Thanks.

Careful. An editor over there has an "anger management" problem. Look at this exchange:

Please be nice[edit]

If possible, could you edit pages rather than attack editors?

If you knew anything about Odinism, you would know Osred is the leader of the Odinic Rite in Australia (Osred Jameson is mentioned in the Odinism article.)

He is also dying of cancer. --Holtj (talk) 06:52, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Anyone can claim to be "Osred" on Wikipedia. It doesn't mean that it's the same person, and even if it is, that wouldn't have given them any right to edit Wikipedia in a manner which contravenes our policies. Midnightblueowl (talk) 12:16, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

--Holtj (talk) 05:13, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--Holtj (talk) 05:16, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You can find the exchange here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Midnightblueowl#Please_be_nice

--Holtj (talk) 05:18, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Death of Lucas Leonard

On 22 November 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Death of Lucas Leonard, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the church at which a young man was beaten to death was described by its neighbors as a "cult" where people "used to build fires on the roofs, and there was chanting and weird rituals"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Death of Lucas Leonard. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:01, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nice! You made the DYK statistics page with over 5,000 hits (6,166 to be exact). Yoninah (talk) 21:02, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ted Cruz In Defense of Christians controversy listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ted Cruz In Defense of Christians controversy. Since you had some involvement with the Ted Cruz In Defense of Christians controversy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 18:55, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Age dysphoria

The article Age dysphoria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An entry for two terms, neither of which appear in either source provided, and the Google results for which are not suggesting notability as a condition.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 03:40, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rocky De La Fuente for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rocky De La Fuente is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocky De La Fuente until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 19:05, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Where White People Meet

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Where White People Meet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:51, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Okilly Dokilly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Beezow Doo-Doo Zoppitybop-Bop-Bop

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Beezow Doo-Doo Zoppitybop-Bop-Bop requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 02:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gives You Hell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom Girls listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Freedom Girls. Since you had some involvement with the Freedom Girls redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:52, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Diamond and Silk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Friend. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Your recent editing history at Diamond and Silk shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Just in the interests of parity; Other editor is now at WP:AN3. Take a back seat eh? Cheers, _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:USUncutLogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:USUncutLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Jalue Dorjee

Hi, I'm Mduvekot. FiredanceThroughTheNight, thanks for creating Jalue Dorjee!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. If he was 9 years old on April 30, 2016 (per the only source) then he was born in 2007 or 2008, not in 1997.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Mduvekot (talk) 20:45, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, thanks for catching the date thing! For some reason I thought it was 2006. You know you're getting old (I'm 26) when you start getting the decade wrong! FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 05:47, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Steve Quinn (talk) 06:25, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Cast Away. Binksternet (talk) 06:00, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Right Stuff (blog), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stormfront. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of The Right Stuff (blog)

Hello! Your submission of The Right Stuff (blog) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:46, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Right Stuff (blog) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Right Stuff (blog) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Right Stuff (blog) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:46, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rick Tyler (politician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rick Tyler (politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Tyler (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:51, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Traditionalist Youth Network for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Traditionalist Youth Network is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traditionalist Youth Network until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by James J. Lambden (talk • contribs) 01:14, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Editing at the Donald Trump presidential campaign

Hello! I just wanted to warn you, since you are relatively new here, that you have to be very careful about editing the Donald Trump presidential campaign article. It is subject to discretionary sanctions. "Discretionary sanctions" means that page is closely watched and people can be sanctioned (blocked) without warning for what they do at that page. A warning appears at the top of the page every time you go to edit that page, saying "You must not make more than one revert per 24 hours to this article, must obtain firm consensus on the talk page of this article before making any potentially contentious edits, and are subject to discretionary sanctions while editing this page." IMO you didn't violate the rules when you re-added material about the star of david tweet, but you came close. If you make more than one revert in 24 hours, or if you put in anything controversial without first clearing it on the talk page, you can be blocked without warning. So consider this a friendly heads up to watch your step at that article. Thanks. --MelanieN (talk) 20:16, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Melanin theory

I don't know what your reasoning was in this edit, but Mumford & Sons Not In Nottingham isn't a source, let alone a reliable one. I have removed it. Kleuske (talk) 08:56, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, I had copied and pasted the wrong link. I was sharing the song on social media around the same time. FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 14:56, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roberto Esquivel Cabrera for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roberto Esquivel Cabrera is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roberto Esquivel Cabrera until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 03:39, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, FiredanceThroughTheNight. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chelsea Manning with wig.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chelsea Manning with wig.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:58, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not the same

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3APaul_Erik&type=revision&diff=760807940&oldid=760807135

Nope, not me. 2600:8805:5800:F500:9C9D:6AB3:CBF8:A317 (talk) 13:12, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for clearing that up. My mistake. FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 06:24, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:USUncutLogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:USUncutLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:22, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Word of Faith Fellowship (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

With such serious allegations, such as being a "cult", we need way more than just one source. Please add more sources that document facts about this group.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Word of Faith Fellowship and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:58, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! FiredanceThroughTheNight, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:58, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've been seeing coverage of this church and was considering my own article. If you wouldn't object, I'd like to make additions to your draft.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:07, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing, go ahead! Thanks, FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 06:06, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anmarie Calgaro

The article Anmarie Calgaro has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nathanael Kapner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nathanael Kapner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathanael Kapner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Scaleshombre (talk) 22:26, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Westboro Baptist Chipmunks listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Westboro Baptist Chipmunks. Since you had some involvement with the Westboro Baptist Chipmunks redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. f e minist 16:25, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, FiredanceThroughTheNight. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jumana Nagarwala for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jumana Nagarwala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jumana Nagarwala until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 06:27, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clovergender listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Clovergender. Since you had some involvement with the Clovergender redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 20:04, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chimpmania

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chimpmania requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 04:51, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. reddogsix (talk) 04:57, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chimpmania for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chimpmania is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chimpmania until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 16:56, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tradwife for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tradwife is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tradwife until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Lionel^(talk) 08:53, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Texas (mercenary) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Texas (mercenary) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texas (mercenary) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ymblanter (talk) 08:25, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, FiredanceThroughTheNight. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nathan Sutherland

Hello FiredanceThroughTheNight,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nathan Sutherland for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 02:54, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Nathan Sutherland

Hello, FiredanceThroughTheNight,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Nathan Sutherland should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Sutherland .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 03:02, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sons of the New Testament for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sons of the New Testament is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sons of the New Testament until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 19:10, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Curlies listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Curlies. Since you had some involvement with the Curlies redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hildeoc (talk) 17:03, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adam Everett Livix for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adam Everett Livix is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Everett Livix until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 08:02, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Murder of Senicha Lessman

Hello! Your submission of Murder of Senicha Lessman at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:51, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Murder of Senicha Lessman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Senicha Lessman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Senicha Lessman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 05:43, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Shitlord" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Shitlord. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 22#Shitlord until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:22, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jesus Strikes Back: Judgment Day for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jesus Strikes Back: Judgment Day is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesus Strikes Back: Judgment Day until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Free Media Kid$ 02:29, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]