User talk:T-1000

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello T-1000, welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips:

Take a look at the Simplified Ruleset.
Read the Tutorial, How to edit a page and the Manual of Style.
Create a User page.
Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
Add yourself to the New user log.
Ask questions at the Village pump or Help desk.
Be bold!
Use the Show preview button
Provide an Edit summary.

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the Edit this page link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing, Alphax ^τεχ 7 July 2005 09:41 (UTC)

		The Barnstar of National Merit

		_{this WikiAward was given to T-1000 by Hongdx (talk) on 05:11, 11 August 2010 (UTC)}[reply]

Comic book Images

Hi T-1000, nice name :)!

Your doing a great job contributing to Wikipedia!

When you upload files to Wikipedia, please include a copyright description tag and a detailed description of what the image is of, where it comes from, (for example what television series or comic book series) and if possible who drew it or created it. If the images come from the Internet to include a URL (which you have done). The images will get deleted if their is no source and detailed explination. See: Wikipedia:Uploading images.

I noticed the image you uploaded Image:Boris venom.jpg doesnt link anywhere, if you dont want it anymore just put a {{del}} on it, and an admin will delete it.

Thanks, the only way Wikipedia could ever become legitmate as an encyclopedia, we have to make sure we reference our articles and source our images, thats the only way we can gain respect! - UnlimitedAccess 7 July 2005 17:01 (UTC)

Wolverine's Superhuman Powers and Nightscream

Nightscream keeps reverting this entry to a version that is really long and contains a whole lot of unnecessary information. He states what he thinks readers opinions of the character's powers are and then tries to imply why they are wrong. His entry is not NPOV and its also poorly written. Try to back us up on this. Myself and several others are getting tired of this. ScifiterX 8 July 2005 16:39 (UTC)

Thanks for the support on reverting the vandalism. Keep it up and hopefully this troll will just give up. ScifiterX 07:08, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Here is one where he isn't just insulting me:

Shocking as it may be to you, I know that others have been reverting the entry. So what? Most of them employ the same sort of Straw Men, word manipulation and other fallacies that you do, as well as irrelevant insults and name-calling, none of which I tend to take very seriously. If you want to engage in a civil discussion in which I might see your point of view, you might consider abandoning those tactics, since they do nothing to lend credence to your position, much less convince me. Nightscream 7.12.05. 7.12.05.

???? say wha??ScifiterX 07:59, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Join the discussion, your input valuable

Talk:Wolverine (comics)#Some sort of compromise

deletion of Iron Fist (comics)

Hello. Please read the criteria for speedy deletion. Iron Fist (comics) does not meet the criteria. Please stop flagging it for deletion. -- JamesTeterenko 04:33, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If there are two pages on the same topic, you have the ability to do everything that needs to be done to fix it. What you need to do is merge the content from one page to the other, then create a redirect. -- JamesTeterenko 04:58, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You may also want to check out Wikipedia:Deletion policy. It contains examples on what to do in various situations. -- JamesTeterenko 05:07, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

IFD

Image:Carnage power.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Carnage power.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Image:Maestro1.gif

Image deletion warning

Image:Maestro1.gif has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Image:Darkseid2.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Darkseid2.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Image:Darkseid power.gif

Image deletion warning

Image:Darkseid power.gif has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Image:Orion2.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Orion2.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Aren't comic panels okay to use if they only show the character? T-1000 17:12, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

You missed the point - you need to say (1) what issue the image comes from and (2) *where* you got the scan (if you own the issue and scanned it yourself, say so, otherwise you need to link to where you got the scan from) - SoM 18:40, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have added sources for the pics. Sorry for the inconvience. T-1000 20:09, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

No, you've only added (2). You still need (1). - SoM 17:33, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A REPLY TO: A REQUEST

Yes I've noticed that some people have been messing with the Marvel Supervillain Entries. I'll try to watch but there is a larger problem. A user called apostrophe has been eliminating Sabretooth, Doctor Doom, Apacolpyse, The Greengoblin and other major Marvel Supervillains from the Marvel Supervillains list by deleting thier categories. I can't stop this alone.ScifiterX 11:34, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:OMEGAR.JPG

Heya, on what grounds is Image:OMEGAR.JPG a speedy deletion candidate? --fvw * 05:39, August 30, 2005 (UTC)

I think it is a copyright violation. It is Dave Dervies' personal artwork (not a comic cover or panel), of which he plan to sell on his website. Nobody asked his permission of whether or not it could be on wikipedia or not. T-1000 02:28, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Then you'll have to take it to WP:CP or WP:IFD, speedy deletion is just for pages that fulfill one of the speedy deletion criteria. --fvw * 13:14, August 31, 2005 (UTC)

Three tips

Don't upload or use trading card images. They're not fair usable under any circumstances, as far as we can tell @ WP:CMC (and, as soon as we think we've found them all, they're all going for deletion)
Don't over-wikify. There's a reasonable expectation that people will know what a "liquid" is, and there should only be one wikilink to any given page in the text of a page.
Reread what you type, and don't use ten words where one will do. - SoM 00:32, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy tagging your images

You tagged some of the images you uploaded for speedy deletion. I assume this means you want them to be removed, since they were a mistake of some kind. Just to furfill the letter of speedy criteria G7 "Any page which is requested for deletion by the original author, provided the author reasonably explains that it was created by mistake, and the page was edited only by its author.", I'm asking you on your talk page. Thanks! JesseW, the juggling janitor 10:55, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

IDW

Image:Spidercide2.jpg

An image or media file you have uploaded, Image:Spidercide2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

FTR, OF = out-of-focus. Nothing to do with sourcing (although you didn't list the issue no.) - SoM 14:37, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wolverine box image

The reason I replaced the Dell'otto (sp?) image with the Coipel one is that we get a far better look at most of his costume (especially the mask) in the Coipel one. The lighting and pose are too extreme in the AXM1 cover to be a good box picture - SoM 19:03, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Greetings fellow college student! :) Regards, --Gramaic | Talk 20:15, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging images for speedy deletion

Thank you for tagging Image:Dog Logan.jpg for speedy deletion. But please use {{db|reason}} instead so we know the exact reason why pages such as that one qualify to be deleted so I and other us admins do not have to guess ourselves. Because it took me a while to figure out that it was indeed redundant to Image:Dog Logan1.jpg, but only after I dug through your contributions. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 19:05, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Scream_sym.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Scream_sym.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

--- Test71.109.95.52 03:36, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:X275.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:X275.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Image:XM275.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:XM275.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Wolverine's Healing Factor being incorrectly listed on Healing Factor

These are the actual marvel universe entries for Wolverine from the Marvel Universe that specifically state that the character has a Superhuman regenerative healing factor, not a metahuman regenerative healing factor. This is official Marvel canon. Click on the links below to see the entries.

However, someone (and I think we know who) has been going back and reverting Wolverine from Superhuman regenerative healing factor to metahuman regenerative just to annoy people. If you could help watch that it would be cool. ScifiterX 03:35, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Zangief in Marvel vs. Capcom 2: New Age of Heroes

Whoops... thanks a lot buddy ^_^ Danny Lilithborne 21:04, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Batman is not an anti-hero.

I think you were the person who made this change before. Batman is in no way, shape, or form an anti-hero. If you want to discuss this, please come to the Batman talk page. Simnel 09:29, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dog Logan

I saw that you reverted a lot of the changes I made to the Dog Logan page, most notably by restoring the parts of the article that describe his ears, teeth, claws, tracking skills, resistance to the elements, and possible healing factor. When I removed those parts of the article, I did so after reading through Origin several times, paying close attention to the drawings of Dog. If you can find specific panels where we see his ears, teeth, or fingers being as you describe them, then we can leave that in the article, but as far as I can tell, they are all normal. There are even a few close-ups of his hands where we can see his normal fingernails. Also, I don't see anything to suggest his tracking skills are extraordinary, nor do I see any unusual resistance to the elements. As for a healing factor, I don't think that needs to be in the article, since his identity as Sabretooth is only speculation, and nothing else in the miniseries suggests that he has a healing factor.

Also, while I agree that we're supposed to infer that Thomas had an affair with Elizabeth, it's never directly stated in the story, so I'm going to change it to "strong suggestion" rather than "fact". Please let me know what you think either here or on my talk page. Thanks. Pitr 05:06, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3rr block

I've blocked you [1] for WP:3RR on Venom (comics) William M. Connolley 13:06, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello T-1000. One of your recent edits was undone by an automated bot as likely abuse of editing privileges. Our welcome page provides information for new users who would like to contribute. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you feel you have recieved this notice in error, please contact the bot owner. Thank you for your interest in our project. // Tawkerbot2 20:48, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Handbook Stats

Why did you remove the Handbook stats that mentioned Sabretooth's strength level in the Sabretooth article? It's not personal opinion, it's Marvel canon. There are other articles that are full of Marvel Handbook stats, most notably the article devoted to characters possessing healing factors so why aren't they allowed in the Sabretooth article?

Gill (Street Fighter)

Thank you for the changes to the page. In the future, use the "Show preview" button so you can be sure the page you're submitting is the way you want the page to look. Danny Lilithborne 00:28, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Hello. Please remember to always provide an edit summary. Thanks and happy editing. Steve block talk 13:26, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where?

You claim you reverted what I had added to the article about Venom because it was "non NPOV fancruft". Please quote the parts that fits into the definition of non NPOV fancruft.

Marvel vs. Capcom 2: New Age of Heroes

"You don't need to put it as one" is not a valid reverting reason. Danny Lilithborne 03:19, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ryu (Street Fighter)

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Danny Lilithborne 02:27, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spider-Man's new costume

You seem to be happy reverting the changes but you refuse to participate on the discussion in said topic. Before you revert it, make a post in discussion explaining why you feel the need to change it.--CyberGhostface 02:33, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Venomvsjuggs11.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Venomvsjuggs11.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:10, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Images changes

If you're going to erase all the images I've uploaded, you could at least replace them with something decent. You have got to have the worst taste I've ever seen, if you think these images you've used are good. You also, obviously, have too much time on your hands. I don't really care that much, so if you want your amazingly corny images up there, fine; have fun. Biff Loman 11:20, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Are you and DrBat the same person? You both have the same taste, and a similar writing style. Biff Loman 11:46, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Pic requests

I got one for Hyperion, I don't know about Sabretooth though. --DrBat 21:17, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nate Grey

It is not a trading card image it is from a Comic Book, X-Men Declassified Vol 1 oct 2000 Pg 21. Dstorres

That was his uniform. It's what he wore in his role as a Mutant Shaman from issue 63 till his death in 75.Dstorres
- His first look from AOA is in the article just a few inches down. It is more fitting for the SHB to have the most recent (or in this case final) image.Dstorres

Healing factor revert

Hi, this morning I made a good edit to the page healing factor. A little while later an IP came and messed up the article, so you reverted. But you didn't just revert him, you reverted me as well. I re-reverted the page to the right version. I am assuming you didn't mean to rv my edit, since it was simply adding to a list. When you revert please be more careful to select the right version to revert to. Also, in this case, although the article was messed up, the IP also added additional info. The revert lost that info. I am unsure if a rv was the right way to fix it. Tobyk777 05:19, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry it is YOUR OPINION that Sentry is a "Superman" for marvel. Flight and Superstrength do not make a ripoff. If so is Thor, SilverSurfer, or Booster Gold or Capt Marvel(shazam) superman ripoff's? Get off your hi-horse and except Marvel fans are tired of DC fans whining that every character is a rip off. Now do I have to report you for forcing your opinion?

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Gladiator.jpg)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Gladiator.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 09:59, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Gladiator Hulk.jpg)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Gladiator Hulk.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 15:30, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Wolb.jpg)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wolb.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 00:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wolb.jpg]]. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 00:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Superboy-Prime a psychopath?

See the discussion at his talk page. --DrBat 22:48, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Summer brother.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Summer brother.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:07, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note on listing comics categories for deletion

In the future, when listing a comics-related category, template, or article for deletion, please list it at WP:CMC/NB. This allows the community to come to a better concensus and feel like part of the process, and we have examples for you to just cut and paste and add the appropriate information to. I'd really appreciate it, and I am sure I'm not the only one. Thanks. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 19:47, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperion page

In my opinion, the change that I have made to the powers and abilities box are not un-necessary, they are perfectly valid. I believe that there needs to be shown a slight difference between the listing of Superman's powers and those of Hyperions. Including the "flash vision" and "regeneration " abilities is correct. Please do not change my edits simply because you disagree with them. We all should be able to discuss these items and then arrive at an agreement. Thank you. --CrystalB4 11:41, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperion's abilities

You need to check further down on the Hyperion page where it lists his powers and abilities. It specifically mentions his "flash" or "atomic" vision and his regeneration abilities seperately. These abilities are and need to be different from Supermans since we don't want Hyperion to appear as if he's a carbon copy of Superman. I also will continue to revert your edits on these two points.--CrystalB4 04:07, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:MDD.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MDD.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:06, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperion's abilities

I am still disagreeing with you on this point. It is important to highlight the difference between Hyperion's abilities and Superman's. Hyperion has "flash" or "Atomic" vision, Superman has "Heat" vision. Hyperion has regenerative abilities that are mentioned in his powers and abilities section, Superman does not (I didn't see regeneration abilities specifically listed anywhere in Superman's powers and abilities section). It is not redundant to list these two abilities in the superhero box, it is simply stating that he possesses these two powers, along with the others.--CrystalB4 02:18, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperion's abilities

Once again, look down in the powers and abilities section on Hyperion's page. It clearly emphasizes that his "flash" vision is radioactive in nature, Superman's "heat" vision is not. Also, Superman is mentioned as having "accelerated" healing on that Healing Factor page, not a "regenerative" healing factor. I doubt that Superman's accelerated healing is the same as say, Wolverine's healing factor, or Hyperions.--CrystalB4 05:05, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperion's abilities

You are incorrect on several points. First, Hyperion's regenerative abilities are "similar" to the eternals of Earth-616, not from any "heritage" that you speak of. Once again, check the Hyperion page itself when you are quoting from it. If it listed in the powers and abilities section, that is what I am going on. If it is listed incorrectly there, then it should be removed or revised. Second, you mention that Superman regenerated from a skeleton in some issue of DKR after he was hit with a nuclear explosion. I do not think that this instance should be considered stricly canon since in all other DC comics titles that Superman has or has appeared in, he can and has survived nuclear explosions. Also, as I have stated before, if you look on the Superman page itself there is no mention of a specific "healing factor" as there is on the Hyperion page. My contention remains the same that we need to highlight a few of the differences in their abilities in this section so as not to present Hyperion as a carbon copy of Superman. Nuff said.--CrystalB4 10:46, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Response

Wolverine: Origins isn't a comic book that takes place outside of Marvel continuity. It's canon. Omega Red appears and the issue states that Omega Red is looking for the Carbonadium Synthesizer. The events of the Dark Knight Returns isn't part of DC continuity, it's an alternate universe/reality. That's the difference. Odin's Beard 01:17, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The story starts out with Wolverine sitting in his underwear in a freezer on board a ship. The monologue is Wolverine talking about how the cut he recieved from the Marumasa Blade during his fight with Captain America isn't healing normally, normally for him. A flashback sequence appears involving Wolverine back during his Team X days. He's in a prison cell awaiting his next orders. A voice booms over an intercom inside the cell and orders him to ingest a small capsule sitting on a plate. Wolverine does so and immediately doubles over in pain, thinking he's been poisoned. A group of guards enter the cell, armed with machine guns, and opens fire. A doctor proclaims that Wolverine is dead and that the study of how Carbonadium effects Wolverine's mutant healing powers. After the flashback ends, Wolverine makes his way from the ship and during another monologue, states that Carbonadium is the key to stopping his son without having to hill him. He also states the Carbonadium has to be synthesized, it doesn't occur naturally. Wolverine winds up catching a ride to Queens, New York after threatening a trucker. Three days later, Wolverine winds up in Queens and goes into some type of shelter/hospital that's filled with depowered mutants, including the one that Wolverine is searching for. Christopher Nord, AKA Maverick. Maverick, in past issues of comic books, is the only one who knows where the Carbonadium Synthesizer is. Just as Wolverine is about to go over to him, he smells Jubilee's scent. He smells another scent as well and quickly tackles her to the ground before the wall behind them explodes revealing Omega Red and at least 4 mercenaries with high tech gear and weaponry. Omega Red addresses Maverick: "Maverick. You will now give me what is mine, yes?"

Originally, I didn't know about any instance where it was stated that Omega Red no longer needed to drain the lifeforce of others, I never changed it because I didn't know for certain if it was true or not. I might've missed an issue. I'll have to do a bit more research to find the actual issues, but I do remember reading that Maverick is the only one who knows where the synthesizer is. I remember one issue...I think it was X-Factor #127, in which Sabretooth and Omega Red fight inside a church. During their fight, Omega Red tells Sabretooth that a bargain had been made with a woman named Ivanova, whos mother Sabretooth killed decades earlier. If Sabretooth was brought to her, she would give Maverick to Omega Red in order to learn the location of the Carbonadium Synthesizer. Odin's Beard 01:38, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperion's Eternal Heritage

Actually, I think that you need to check the page more carefully. His Eternal heritage is mentioned in only one of the six versions of Hyperion (Hyperion I). This does not make it so for all versions nor is it strictly canon. My position remains unchanged on this matter.--CrystalB4 13:54, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperion's Eternal Heritage

T-1000, you need to thoroughly read the Hyperion page. The only version of Hyperion that mentions anything about his Eternal heritage is Hyperion I. Nor is there any mention of this on the Hyperion page at www.marvel.com. As for the changes to your edits on the Superman page, I have already explained. The regenerative abilities that you attribute to Superman in that DKR issue is not canon with the rest of the DC universe and should not be added to his powers and abilities section.--CrystalB4 03:34, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CrystalB4, the Marvel page is by no means an exhaustive resource link towards a character's entire history. Within the Quaasar series there are several references towards Hyperion's Eternal heritage, and the second Hyperion is fundamentally based on the original's template. In addition, there are multiple references of Superman's regenerative abilities throughout his entire published history, the Infinite Crisis simply being the most substantive as it is recent. NetK 04:33, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Supermans abilities

I read the page, my opinion remains unchanged. The DKR is not mainstream DC universe and this particular instance with Wonder Woman is still not enough to go by. Thus, the regenerative abilities that you allude to should not be shown on the powers and abilities page of Superman.--CrystalB4 04:11, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Supermans abilities

Don't use the NPOV as an excuse to try to get me banned. Simply becase you don't agree with me does not mean you should try to have me banned. Be an adult here, I am not vandalizing this article or insulting you in any way. Just because you might reference a source does not make it absolutely right in all cases. My point of view can be just as accurate.--CrystalB4 04:20, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regeneration

T-1000, I concur with your assessment of Superman's regenerative capabilities. In fact there are far more examples of this throughout his post-Crisis existence including when his power levels had dropped during different periods. However, you mention this as a result of his Kryptonian heritage. Wouldn't a more accurate assessment be that this ability is derived specifically from his solar power absorption capability. I question how regenerative his body would be under a red sun. NetK 04:25, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

True however it may be more accurate to state that the regenerative abilities are derived from how his Kryptonian physique processes yellow sun radiation. My sole contention is, under a red sun, there is no quantifiable evidence that he would regenerate above the normal human rate. NetK 04:29, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Earthvega.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Earthvega.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:36, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Omega Red

If Omega Red had carbonadium armor, then how did Psylocke manage to stab him through the chest and puncture his lung with a katana when, according to the article itself, its nearly impossible to do even with adamantium weapons. Also, in #7, after Wolverine breaks free from his restraints, he slashes Omega Red across the chest. If you look at Omega Red's chest, you can see where Wolverine's claws are slicing through the material as well as a healthy splattering of blood. I've got the issue in my hand right now and it's hard to argue with it. Odin's Beard 23:24, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any claw marks on Omega Red's face. I'm not making this up in order to start a debate, but I simply don't see what you're seeing. I can't explain why the artist didn't draw a puncture or slash wounds in Omega Red's armor, you'd have to ask him. All I know is, in the issue, his left lung is punctured. That couldn't happen unless the sword pierced his chest cavity. I can't explain the inconsistencies, but I also can't recall where it's actually printed that Omega Red's armor is carbonadium. I remember him stating that it was in the X-Men animated series, but that's a different continuity. Odin's Beard 00:59, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's the panel where Psylocke drives her katana through him. Also, if you look at the panel where Wolverine slahes him, after breaking free from his restraints, there's no evidence that Wolverine slashes him across the face. While it does show him slashing and a large splatter of blood, it doesn't clearly show where he was slashed, although certainly not on the face. Odin's Beard 01:18, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have the issues involving his battle with Iron Man or Chamber, but you also haven't provided a source that clearly states that Omega Red possesses carbonadium armor. Look, let's not try to split hairs over this. The issue states that his left lung was punctured, meaning the sword had to penetrate his body. This in and of itself raises serious doubt as to whether Omega Red's armor is carbonadium. Odin's Beard 01:24, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have to also take into account what's written, not just what's shown in the drawings. If it states that his lung was punctured, then the fact that the sword sticking out his back is irrelevant. You have to look at the possibility that she simply didn't drive her sword completely through his body. Odin's Beard 01:29, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why, just because you say so? What happened in X-Men #7 raises doubts about Omega Red having carbonadium armor. You also have yet to provide exactly where it states in any comic that Omega Red has carbonadium armor, or even a carbonadium laced bones for that matter. If there's a canonical source that states it, then that will put the issue to rest once and for all. Until then, I'm taking it out of the article. Odin's Beard 01:52, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see how that simply overrules what happened in X-Men #7. But, I'll leave that alone for the moment. How much force Chamber generated is irrelevant, you're avoiding the issue. You've provided an instance where the material of Omega Red's costume has withstood a heavy assault, granted, but that still doesn't prove that the armor is composed of carbonadium. Iron Man's robotic armor can withstand high degrees of impact without being damaged, that doesn't mean that it's composed of carbonadium or adamantium. Until a canonical source is cited that explicitly states that his armor is carbonadium, it's still just speculation on your part. Odin's Beard 02:40, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

POV?

This:

Can you please keep an eye on the edits of Asgardian? He is making POV editor and disregarding formatting standards on The Gladiator and Abomination pages. Thank you. T-1000 18:26, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

it is a tad hypocritical as to judge from not only the Gladiator page but also your Talk page everything is POV. Formatting is fine - it is the content that needs work.

Asgardian 01:09, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:X Men 7 09 m.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:X Men 7 09 m.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:08, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Carnage Image

You uploaded an image of Carnage in Carng1.jpg, but this is identical to another image. see: Spidermanep38.jpg File:Spidermanep38.jpg.Gman124 20:15, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Gladiator1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Gladiator1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 21:51, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:MDD.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:MDD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 12:44, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Nef1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nef1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 14:32, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Thanos02gif.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Thanos02gif.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Tyrantthanos.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tyrantthanos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gman124 23:40, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Odin1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Odin1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gman124 15:41, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Storm_game.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Storm_game.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:00, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Glad Hyper.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Glad Hyper.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Greb 11:09, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Wolhearing.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wolhearing.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gman124 20:51, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Ma_psylocke.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Ma_psylocke.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphened images

Thanks for uploading Image:Cable game.gif and Image:Hulk maestro.jpg. The images are orphnedGman124 01:46, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cap.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cap.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Perón 14:59, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Colossus game.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Colossus game.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:26, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Blackheart game.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Blackheart game.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:55, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Xf138b.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Xf138b.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:08, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Omegared004.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Omegared004.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:07, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Omega Red AoA.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Omega Red AoA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:07, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Omega Heal.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Omega Heal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:07, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:ULTEXT001 cov.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:ULTEXT001 cov.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:34, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Nimrod tv.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Nimrod tv.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:42, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Xmenwolverine1.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Xmenwolverine1.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Drdoom.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Drdoom.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mindwipem.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mindwipem.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 15:34, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wolb.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wolb.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:10, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:WolDeath.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:WolDeath.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:59, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Shuma.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Shuma.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:12, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Metallo5.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Metallo5.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:03, 6 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Greb 02:03, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:MVenom.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:MVenom.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hulk mount.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hulk mount.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:21, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sabadam.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sabadam.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:24, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sabbell.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sabbell.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:24, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Riottoy.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Riottoy.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 01:00, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lesres.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lesres.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Heat vision2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Heat vision2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dog slash.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dog slash.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Black cat kiss.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Black cat kiss.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Donnasym.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Donnasym.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hulkbuster.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Hulkbuster.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hybridsym.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hybridsym.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hybridtalk.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hybridtalk.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nefaria3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nefaria3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Toyscream.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Toyscream.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 23:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Owlman.gif

Thank you for uploading Image:Owlman.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:27, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Karen Page.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Karen Page.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 12:10, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://books.google.com/books?id=he8jrQkk3lYC&pg=PA99&lpg=PA99&dq=china+618+-907&source=web&ots=LyFeoaK_Rw&sig=2-DlW-yGd5h5cDzBZecsxJFBMB4&hl=en

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ethan edwards.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ethan edwards.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:15, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Since this is your second violation of the 3RR your block is now 48 hours. I also note that you did not use the talk page to seek consensus against the edit you reverted but the people you were revert warring with did. Please note that 3RR blocks for repeat offenders can and do increase in length for each violation. Please consider this carefully and decide whether you need to change your editing style. If you disagree with the block you can appeal it with {{unblock|yourreasonhere}}. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:41, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

T-1000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, Spartaz. Regarding my violation of the 3RR rule, the change to the PRC made by User:Singaga was first done without consensus. That is why I reverted them. I went off Wikipedia for a few hours, and when I come back, I was blocked. There was no disscusions on the talk pages when I went off. So it is not that I did not use talk pages to gain consensus, I simply was not on Wiki. Please reconsider my Block. T-1000 (talk) 09:38, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not an excuse for violating WP:3RR. — Sandstein (talk) 11:46, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

you could have started the discussion yourself. How can you say there was no consensus against the edits if there had been no discussion at the time you were doing the reverting? Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:14, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the edits made by User:Singaga were already revert by several other editors. That's why I felt he needed to justify his edits first. T-1000 (talk) 18:30, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dog tooth.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dog tooth.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:04, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:dog tooth.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:dog tooth.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? CyberGhostface (talk) 01:16, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Abomination.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Abomination.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:11, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ff249.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ff249.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Omega10.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Omega10.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:35, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Omega Red Cartoons.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Omega Red Cartoons.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:33, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:She hulk 7 cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:She hulk 7 cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Spiderman037.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Spiderman037.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 08:22, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Champion1.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Champion1.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:46, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spider-Man

Hi. As you appear to be one of the major contributors to the Spider-Man article, I'm alerting you to the fact that I have nominated this article to become a Good Article. If you are able to have a look at the article and fix up anything that needs fixing (sourcing, grammar, etc), feel free to do so before the review starts, or feel free to wait until the review starts to see what concerns the GA reviewer may bring up. Good work on helping to get it to where it is so far. :) BOZ (talk) 22:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spider-Man has been picked up for GA review, which can be viewed here. There are a number of concerns to be addressed and some work to be done, so pitch in if you are able, make any suggestions that you think might be helpful, or at least just be there for moral support. :) BOZ (talk) 14:40, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.cnd.org/CND-Global/CND-Global.00.4th/CND-Global.00-10-19.html

Orphaned non-free media (File:Scream sym.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Scream sym.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

link

http://www.gvm.com.tw/gvsrc/200907_GVSRC_others.pdf

T-1000

Going by pure numbers, the consensus is currently six to three (five if you count the anons, but as they are not longstanding contributors or anything, they really cannot be counted). Other than that, the arguments for keeping it are very weak. Will you edit war if I redirect it again or will you just let it be until a potential time where it can actually stand as a full article? TTN (talk) 18:41, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Both anons have contributed to other articles besides this one, so they are not single purpose voting accounts. Anyway, neither Six to three nor Six to five are consensus. If the discussion closed right now, it would be no consensus to merge. I suggest leaving it open. T-1000 (talk) 19:47, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They are still not significant editors, so they cannot be counted. Unless it is obvious that those are their primary means of editing, either anon could easily be someone just logging off to add numbers to the equation. You're still too stuck on numbers anyway. If it were an AfD, it would most likely be closed as merge due to the arguments not holding any weight. You're basically just basing everything off of emotional value. Two or three of the editors who have commented have also worked on getting fictional character articles and lists of characters up to FA and FL status, so why not at least listen to them? TTN (talk) 19:57, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't turn this into a "you vs. me" type of affair. If you suspect that somebody is socking, you are free to request a CheckUser. Regardless, the lack of consensus is real and that is why the article should not be merged now. Thanks. T-1000 (talk) 07:33, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is basically all about you. You're apparently the only person who has the ability to decide the definition of a consensus, so as long as I'm not willing to edit war over it, it seems to be your call. Despite the fact that the policy page explicitly states that arguments are more important than numbers, what exactly do you want? Should it be ten to three, fifteen to three, or maybe you wish for fifty to three? I get that you like the character, but holding the "no consensus card" out for ten years isn't going to improve anything. Why not just allow for the normal process: let the film article develop, and if the information on the character becomes too unwieldy to properly fit in the article, it gets split back out. Also, please reply here. TTN (talk) 13:00, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reaching consensus is simply proper Wikipedia procdure, and there is no evidence that anyone is socking. Furthurmore, my argument is based not on numbers or emotions. I believe that the T-1000 has real world notablity because sites such [2] talk about his creation, (and the T-1000 is the only character to make use of CGI, so it is specific to him). I have already found movie reviews where the reviewers praise the T-1000's special effects, so a real world reception section can also be built. I don't see how retaining the T-1000s article will hamper the T2 article (as for example, Master Chief and Halo are two separate articles with content overlap, and Master Chief is a featured article). T-1000 (talk) 18:10, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Link

http://www.taiwandocuments.org/ata.htm

http://cwis.org/fwdp/Eurasia/taiwan.txt

http://www.infinitemb.com/download/708/AmericanHistoryX.avi

http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/Thai-Year-age-Question-t235464.html

Orphaned non-free image (File:Sabreparents10tf.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sabreparents10tf.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zoo Fari 04:37, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Republic of China. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 00:34, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page titles

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Geography of China a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen.

In addition, I think it is clear that this move would be controversial; therefore, it should be discussed at WP:RM first and carried out only if there is a consensus to do so. Thank you. R'n'B (call me Russ) 14:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Russ, thanks for your message. I didn't use the move function because the old title is not going to be a redirect to the new title, but rather a dab page. As for the discussion, I did start one at Talk:Geography of China, and nobody objected. Now, the other editor I was discussing this with, User:Readin, reverted your changes, so I don't think the move is controversial. If there is still a problem please let me know. Thanks. T-1000 (talk) 00:21, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see that a second copy-and-paste move was performed but subsequently fixed by another editor. Now, all that is left is to review individually and fix the 199 other Wikipedia articles that contain links to Geography of China, since they will all need to point to some other article. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 06:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here they are: Special:WhatLinksHere/Geography_of_China. Have fun :P Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 06:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to the Confucius article

You undid my addition of Taiwan culture to the list of those already stated as NPOV. Please tell me how this is so, as I am utterly bewhildered. Thanks. Rothery (talk) 16:32, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioning Taiwan does not take any position whatsoever on its political status. That is really all I need to say. Your argument dies at this point. If the article said "Confucious has influenced many soveriegn, independent countries such as Korea, Vietnam, Taiwan and China" or something like that, then you would have a valid argument. But it simply states "Confucious was a Chinese thinker and social philosopher, whose teachings and philosophy have deeply influenced Chinese, Korean, Japanese, and Vietnamese thought and life".

And each of those countries link to the relevant "Culture of Japan", "Culture of Vietnam" etc page. The Taiwan one would redirect to Culture of Taiwan. And, funnily enough, the opening sentence of that article notes that Confucious has played an important part in Taiwan's cultural development, 哈哈. That is more than enough justification to place Taiwan on the "list", but here is one more thing...

The influence of Confucious on 大陸 and Taiwan is not the same, so there is nothing wrong with mentioning Taiwan as a culture influenced by Confucious. Similarly, articles about the Dalai Lama would correctly note his influence on Tibet as this is to a greater and different extent compared to China.

If you don't give me good rebuttals to this I will add it back to the list. I will also post this on the Confucious talk page. Thank you. Rothery (talk) 02:46, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Government in exile

Hello, Why did you remove my comment on the talk page? I'm assuming it was accidental. Thanks. Ngchen (talk) 16:55, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:15, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on AIDC F-CK-1 Ching-kuo. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. BilCat (talk) 06:21, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Dog Logan1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Dog Logan1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 18:21, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Spider-Man 37.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Spider-Man 37.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Government in Exile Cabal case

I've gone ahead and signed myself on as mediator for this case. see the note I left on the mediation page - Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2010-10-17/Government in exile in the mediator's section. If you could each start by explaining what your particular perspective on the problem is (in the 'initial perspectives' section) that would help me get oriented. Please, for this first step try as much as possible to pretend that the other disputants aren't there; just explain your side without (as much as possible) commenting on other people's perspectives, or responding to what they have or do say. I really just want to get your unsullied view on the issue. --Ludwigs2 06:48, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Third Summers brother for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Third Summers brother is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Third Summers brother until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.--Crazy runner (talk) 06:43, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

YOur revert of my changes in China and claim of NPOV

Hi T-1000, you reverted my changes and claimed it was NPOV. How is it NPOV? I only stated the facts and placed founding of ROC first and described briefly. Pleasee explain. Thanks. --Mistakefinder (talk) 20:28, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FIXDABLINKS

Hello, T-1000. Since you moved Administrative divisions of China to a new title, and converted the old title into a disambiguation page, please be sure to follow WP:FIXDABLINKS and correct all the pages that include links to the old title. Don't worry, there are only about a thousand of them, so it shouldn't take too long! --R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:30, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page protocol

Generally, once someone has removed your comment from their talkpage, it's considered Very Bad Form to add it back. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:34, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Third opinion at Talk:Scouts of China

I have provided a third opinion by request, as well as moving the dispute thread to, Talk:Scouts of China. Any further thoughts would be appreciated. — chro • man • cer 20:32, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your change on Taiwan, China

Please explain your change of 22:54 June 17, 2011 from Taiwanese to ROC citizens. The demonym for the ROC as a state is Taiwanese, as since the state is commonly called "Taiwan" so I don't see how a change is necessary. If "Taiwanese citizen" is not correct or acceptable, the it should also be not acceptable to use "Chinese citizen" anywhere in Wikipedia but rather use "PRC citizen", and no use of the word "Chinese" to describe any current institutions or government leaders in the PRC.

Got it. Thanks for pointing to the covention! Mistakefinder (talk) 21:22, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Kgbeast.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kgbeast.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:13, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dark claw.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dark claw.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:05, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What next

I did not expect three administrators to support the ill-formed move request. If the China and PRC move is indeed done, we will need to form a rapid response to reset the configuration or make [[China]] the disambiguation page. Also Benlisquare and many, many others could be of assistance. Wikipedia will not stand for this any day mainland China and Taiwan are politically separate. The Tartanator 02:58, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You might consider reading WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT. - Metal lunchbox ^(talk) 23:00, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Republic of China article

Since you have previously discussed about the Republic of China, I guess you are interested to share your insights at Talk:Republic of China#Requested Move (February 2012). Thanks for your attention. 61.18.170.227 (talk) 19:02, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Weaponx1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Weaponx1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:04, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Young Dog.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Young Dog.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:01, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Silver Sam.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Silver Sam.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:40, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Summer brother.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Summer brother.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:35, 30 September 2013 (UTC) --Mistakefinder (talk) 15:30, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"China" and "Taiwan" politically charged terms?

Following up on your comment on my talk page. If "China and Taiwan are politically charged terms" (POV) as you said and to be avoided, then isn't the use of China for PRC article and Taiwan for the ROC article politically charged also? Maybe those pages' names need to changed back to PRC and ROC instead. Mistakefinder (talk) 15:30, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sabretooth X-Men162.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sabretooth X-Men162.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NeoBatfreak (talk) 23:48, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Healing factor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Healing factor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Healing factor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 17:01, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hulk heal.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hulk heal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Scream sym.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Scream sym.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NeoBatfreak (talk) 13:47, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dog Logan.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dog Logan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kingpincap.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kingpincap.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:43, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]