Talk:Stripper

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stripper article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 2 months

Wikipedia is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nudity High‑importance

	Nudity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nudity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of nudity and naturism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NudityWikipedia:WikiProject NudityTemplate:WikiProject Nuditynudity
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pornography Low‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occupations (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OccupationsWikipedia:WikiProject OccupationsTemplate:WikiProject OccupationsOccupations

Sexology and sexuality: Sex work Mid‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sex work task force (assessed as High-importance).

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q1. Further details were available on the "Education Program:New College of Florida/Work Organization and Its Alternatives (Spring)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

Needs a substantial rewrite

Well, it does. Different cultures, history, notable individuals etc. Btljs (talk) 13:11, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is that really necessary? What are some specific changes you think should be made? Professor Penguino (talk) 01:01, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First photo

The very first photo in this article has nudity. I don't think the very first article should have this -- it should be moved further down just to be considerate to others who might click on the article an don't want to see that sort of thing. Professor Penguino (talk) 01:09, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm far more concerned (and offended) by the photo of the male stripper towards the bottom. It appears that he isn't wearing socks with his converse shoes, and that could lead to some very smelly feet. This goes against best hygiene practices. Viriditas (talk) 02:51, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok... Professor Penguino (talk) 23:25, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whoosh… Viriditas (talk) 23:39, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I get that it's a joke. What else am I supposed to say? Professor Penguino (talk) 04:21, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"In the vast majority of human cultures, the breasts play no role in sexual attraction or sexual behavior. Defining breasts as sexually erotic, and fondling or manipulating them during sexual activity is best described as a cultural (learned) paraphilia of limited geographic and temporal distribution."[1] Viriditas (talk) 23:44, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the English Wikipedia, is it not? How is nudity usually viewed in English-speaking countries? When did I ever say it was sexual? Yes, having a semi nude photo as the first image in an English Wikipedia article is problematic. Professor Penguino (talk) 04:23, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm familiar with those historical discussions on the subject, but I must ask, how and why is a "semi nude photo" problematic? Perhaps the real problem is people pushing their religious beliefs on to others? If you start off by thinking that the human body is "problematic", then your entire worldview is fucked. Viriditas (talk) 10:15, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Erm... what? I'm saying having it on a site used by lots of people is problematic. You're misrepresenting what I'm saying. And I'm an atheist for goodness sake. Professor Penguino (talk) 23:30, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:NOTCENSORED. Tintinthereporter226 20:26, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already read. Just saying it should be moved down as a courtesy. Besides, it's already been done, so a continuing discussion is pretty pointless. Professor Penguino (talk) 21:37, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Technical and Professional Writing

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2024 and 5 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lillycharles (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Lillycharles.

— Assignment last updated by Lillycharles (talk) 21:19, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New editor introduction

Hi I noticed that this article could benefit and be more informative if parts of the article are edited to sound more unbiased. I plan to edit this article over the next couple of weeks. I plan to edit this article to include less gendered language and be more inclusion. While reading this article I noticed that there is a lot of information that is not relevant to strippers or stripping as a whole. For example the Go-Go dancing section is unneeded because Go-Go dancers do not strip. I think a lot of the information in this article is too broad by focusing on exotic dancing instead of solely on stripping. Lillycharles (talk) 14:13, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]