Talk:Government Hooker/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hahc21 (talk · contribs) 17:42, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edit: "conspired" >> "worked" (it's a song, not a terrorist plan)
Minor edit: "Herbert approbated the particular tune the most out of all of the tracks that Shadow played for him." >> "Herbert named the particular tune as the most out of all of the tracks that Shadow played for him."

Write "South Korea GAON International Chart" as title instead of "스트리밍 순위집계 : 온라인 음원 스트리밍 수" and add on the reference the week on which the song appeared, since the main link http://gaonchart.co.kr/main/section/online/streaming/list.gaon returns only the latest chart, thus rendering unverifiable the position.
The (subscrition required) tag must be added to the "US Hot Dance/Electronic Digital Songs" chart position reference.

Nothing else. 'til the charts are fixed, i'll put it on hold. —Hahc 21 19:19, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I believe everything is all in order. :) —DAP388 (talk) 19:54, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mmm well, on the Gaon chart i was referring to this:

"South Korea GAON International Chart" (in Korean). Korea Music Content Industry Association. To properly see the chart position, select 2011 and 2011.05.22~2011.05.28. Retrieved June 20, 2012.

This way, anyone can verify the charts. And change the link to

http://www.gaonchart.co.kr/main/section/online/streaming/list.gaon?nationGbn=E

I'll do it myself.

Well, since eveything has been fixed. I'll pass the article. —Hahc 21 20:09, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·