Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alu-Oshaeraen Shrine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:50, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alu-Oshaeraen Shrine

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely fails Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features) with almost 0 sources that aren't wikipedia mirrors or blogs. The closest thing to a source is this but I highly doubt it is enough. Gaismagorm (talk) 22:42, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and Nigeria. Gaismagorm (talk) 22:42, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No one seems to have contributed to this in 14 years, and it's unreferenced. I suspect a PROD might have sufficed. Jclemens (talk) 07:13, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose I probably should have done that actually. My bad, I'll make sure to do that next time something like this happens. Gaismagorm (talk) 13:29, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a failure or error, it's just you skipped a simpler process which would likely have led to the same outcome. Jclemens (talk) 20:18, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah okay, thanks! Gaismagorm (talk) 00:49, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No sources available anywhere on this.4meter4 (talk) 07:19, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Regrettably unsourced and unlikely to be sourced. A comment on the potential of using the PROD process: I feel that older articles, even if obvious PROD candidates, deserve the consideration of AFD rather than the summary deletion of an expired PROD, simply because of their age. It just feels more polite, somehow. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:17, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, that is a good point. Gaismagorm (talk) 18:59, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No reliable and independent sources to establish notability Ibjaja055 (talk) 21:35, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.