Archives: A1, A2

Why was my edit to the "list of file formats" page about the "EPK" format undone?

edit

Hello, I feel like my edit was constructive to the page as I included the more current usage of the file format "EPK". I also linked to a website called "eaglercraft.dev" which, unlike the previously linked site, doesn't host malicious and misleading ads.

There isn't any official source nor site that hosts the Eaglercraft project, as the creator(s) of the project don't host it themselves.

Can you please explain why you feel it wasn't constructive? Solenten (talk) 21:38, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

>>I also linked to a website called "eaglercraft.dev" which, unlike the previously linked site, doesn't host malicious and misleading ads
Can you provide any evidence/source to support your claim that the `.com` domain is malicious. I don't see any such ads. I haven't used the website comprehensively. So, I may have less idea.
If there is no official website, it's better to not have any URL. Waonderer (talk) 21:44, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I remember having a photo of all the fake download button ads, and since there isn't an official source it is indeed better to just not have a URL attached to it. Solenten (talk) 21:53, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
You are welcome to kindly remove the URL. Thanks. Waonderer (talk) 21:55, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Copyvivo Shutterfly (horse)

edit

Hi, I noticed you put a banner on this new article I translated. I used this source to support the article, but I did not copy paste any of the text and wrote it in my own words. Can you please highlight where the copyright violation is? Thank you Nayyn (talk) 22:59, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I used the tool you linked to. It showed a 9% similarity index. There was no copy pasting. If there is something that you find egregious enough to put a red banner on, please highlight that. People are human, but I did not copy and paste this article. Nayyn (talk) 23:15, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

FMOD page edit

edit

I contacted the owner of Eaglercraft.dev on discord about how promotional their article was, and they revised it to be informative instead as the the main purpose was to inform about the project. can I add it back? as a reminder this is the article. ARandomUser104 (talk) 01:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sure. But please don't forget to add a proper informative Edit summary while making Edits. It helps reviewer of the pages, and reduces chances of reverts by mistake. Waonderer (talk) 01:49, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Okay. ARandomUser104 (talk) 01:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of 2024 Bangladeshi military coup for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Bangladeshi military coup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Bangladeshi military coup until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MdsShakil (talk) 22:59, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable non-free use File:Indian Pop Group W.I.S.H.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Indian Pop Group W.I.S.H.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:59, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi Waonderer! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 00:37, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Waonderer. Thank you for your work on Bhashini. Another editor, Dcotos, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 19:11, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Waonderer. Thank you for your work on EMigrate (portal). Another editor, Dcotos, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 11:40, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Dcotos: Thanks for quick review as always. Waonderer (talk) 11:47, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jai Hanuman (film) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jai Hanuman (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jai Hanuman (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GrabUp - Talk 07:50, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Jai Hanuman (film) poster.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Jai Hanuman (film) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:16, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hello Waonderer! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Alphabetical subheadings on Category pages don't seem to work, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 04:41, 23 November 2024 (UTC)Reply