Alli

Hongkong

Bewertungen

Bewertung zu Slash


Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

AML Compliance? What Compliance?

Compliance Professional As someone who works in financial compliance, I was shocked to see Slash's name attached to ChicksX accounts. Any basic Bank Secrecy Act due diligence would have flagged this entity — no FinCEN MSB registration, no state money transmitter licenses, and wire patterns that are textbook red flags for layering. Slash's failure here isn't just a business mistake — it's a potential BSA/AML violation. Their controls are either broken or willfully blind. I'm sharing this so others in fintech know what Slash's risk infrastructure actually looks like.

29. Mai 2026
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung

Antwort von Slash

Thank you for sharing your concerns. Slash takes BSA/AML compliance, sanctions screening, transaction monitoring, and customer due diligence extremely seriously. We cannot discuss specific customers, accounts, reviews, or investigative details in a public forum, but we review all allegations of potential misuse or suspicious activity through our established compliance processes and take appropriate action when warranted.

 Slash maintains a risk-based compliance program designed to identify, escalate, and address suspicious activity, including enhanced review where activity or customer profiles require it. If you have specific information you believe our compliance team should review, please contact us directly at support@slash.com so it can be routed to the appropriate team.

 We appreciate the opportunity to clarify that compliance is a core part of how we operate, and we remain committed to meeting our regulatory obligations and protecting the integrity of our platform.

Bewertung zu ChicksX