User talk:Hanhil

In case of questions, please contact me on my Dutch talkpage

nl-N	Deze gebruiker heeft het Nederlands als moedertaal.

de-2	Dieser Benutzer beherrscht Deutsch auf fortgeschrittenem Niveau.

en-2	This user has intermediate knowledge of English.

fr-1	Cet utilisateur dispose de connaissances de base en français.

li-1	Deze gebroeker haet 'n elementair kènnis van 't Limburgs.

af-1	Hierdie gebruiker het basiese kennis van Afrikaans.

Boodschap bij Image:Hendrik Conscience.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Dit bestand kan verwijderd worden.

Bedankt voor het uploaden van Image:Hendrik Conscience.jpg. Ik heb gezien dat bij dit bestand op dit moment niet vermeld wordt wie het gemaakt heeft, dus de auteursrechtenstatus is onduidelijk. Als u dit bestand niet zelf heeft gemaakt, dan moet u beargumenteren dat we het recht hebben het bestand te gebruiken op Wikimedia Commons (zie het aangeven van auteursrechtenstatus hieronder). Als u het bestand niet zelf gemaakt heeft, geef dan aan waar u het heeft gevonden, in veel gevallen: link naar de website waar u het vandaan heeft, en vermeld de voorwaarden waaronder het bestand volgens die bron gebruikt mag worden. Als de content een afgeleid werk of een auteursrechtelijk beschermd werk is, dan dient u ook de namen en de licentie van de oorsponkelijke auteur(s) te vermelden.

Als er bij het bestand geen auteursrechtenstatus is aangegeven, voeg die dan ook toe. Als u het bestand zelf heeft gemaakt, dan kan u {{GFDL-self}} gebruiken om het het vrij te geven onder de nl:GFDL, {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} om het vrij te geven onder een Creative Commons Naamsvermelding-GelijkDelen-licentie, of {{PD-self}} om het vrij te geven in het publieke domein. Zie Commons:Copyright tags voor een volledige (Engelstalige) lijst van beschikbare licentiesjablonen.

Alle bestanden zonder bronvermelding en/of zonder licentie worden een week na constatering van het ontbreken van een van deze twee punten verwijderd, zoals beschreven staat op criteria voor snelle verwijdering (Engels). Als u ook andere bestanden heeft toegevoegd, controleer dan alstublieft of u daar wel een bronvermelding en licentie hebt geplaatst. Een overzicht van al uw uploads kan u bekijken met het hulpprogramma Gallery. Dank u. Patstuart 16:45, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Boodschap bij Image:Cornelis Felix van Maanen.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Dit bestand kan verwijderd worden.

Bedankt voor het uploaden van Image:Cornelis Felix van Maanen.jpg. Ik heb gezien dat bij dit bestand op dit moment niet vermeld wordt wie het gemaakt heeft, dus de auteursrechtenstatus is onduidelijk. Als u dit bestand niet zelf heeft gemaakt, dan moet u beargumenteren dat we het recht hebben het bestand te gebruiken op Wikimedia Commons (zie het aangeven van auteursrechtenstatus hieronder). Als u het bestand niet zelf gemaakt heeft, geef dan aan waar u het heeft gevonden, in veel gevallen: link naar de website waar u het vandaan heeft, en vermeld de voorwaarden waaronder het bestand volgens die bron gebruikt mag worden. Als de content een afgeleid werk of een auteursrechtelijk beschermd werk is, dan dient u ook de namen en de licentie van de oorsponkelijke auteur(s) te vermelden.

Als er bij het bestand geen auteursrechtenstatus is aangegeven, voeg die dan ook toe. Als u het bestand zelf heeft gemaakt, dan kan u {{GFDL-self}} gebruiken om het het vrij te geven onder de nl:GFDL, {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} om het vrij te geven onder een Creative Commons Naamsvermelding-GelijkDelen-licentie, of {{PD-self}} om het vrij te geven in het publieke domein. Zie Commons:Copyright tags voor een volledige (Engelstalige) lijst van beschikbare licentiesjablonen.

Alle bestanden zonder bronvermelding en/of zonder licentie worden een week na constatering van het ontbreken van een van deze twee punten verwijderd, zoals beschreven staat op criteria voor snelle verwijdering (Engels). Als u ook andere bestanden heeft toegevoegd, controleer dan alstublieft of u daar wel een bronvermelding en licentie hebt geplaatst. Een overzicht van al uw uploads kan u bekijken met het hulpprogramma Gallery. Dank u. Patstuart 16:48, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Boodschap bij Image:Rotterdamse Schie 1611.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Dit bestand kan verwijderd worden.

Bedankt voor het uploaden van Image:Rotterdamse Schie 1611.jpg. Ik heb gezien dat bij dit bestand op dit moment niet vermeld wordt wie het gemaakt heeft, dus de auteursrechtenstatus is onduidelijk. Als u dit bestand niet zelf heeft gemaakt, dan moet u beargumenteren dat we het recht hebben het bestand te gebruiken op Wikimedia Commons (zie het aangeven van auteursrechtenstatus hieronder). Als u het bestand niet zelf gemaakt heeft, geef dan aan waar u het heeft gevonden, in veel gevallen: link naar de website waar u het vandaan heeft, en vermeld de voorwaarden waaronder het bestand volgens die bron gebruikt mag worden. Als de content een afgeleid werk of een auteursrechtelijk beschermd werk is, dan dient u ook de namen en de licentie van de oorsponkelijke auteur(s) te vermelden.

Als er bij het bestand geen auteursrechtenstatus is aangegeven, voeg die dan ook toe. Als u het bestand zelf heeft gemaakt, dan kan u {{GFDL-self}} gebruiken om het het vrij te geven onder de nl:GFDL, {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} om het vrij te geven onder een Creative Commons Naamsvermelding-GelijkDelen-licentie, of {{PD-self}} om het vrij te geven in het publieke domein. Zie Commons:Copyright tags voor een volledige (Engelstalige) lijst van beschikbare licentiesjablonen.

Alle bestanden zonder bronvermelding en/of zonder licentie worden een week na constatering van het ontbreken van een van deze twee punten verwijderd, zoals beschreven staat op criteria voor snelle verwijdering (Engels). Als u ook andere bestanden heeft toegevoegd, controleer dan alstublieft of u daar wel een bronvermelding en licentie hebt geplaatst. Een overzicht van al uw uploads kan u bekijken met het hulpprogramma Gallery. Dank u. Patstuart 16:48, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: Image:Hendrik Conscience.jpg

What is the problem with the description of Hendrik Conscience? It is an old painting in the Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten in Antwerpen. The description mentions the name of the painter, ànd the place where the painting currently is, so imho there is no problem. The same applies for Image:Cornelis Felix van Maanen.jpg, where the painter is unknown, but I mentioned the museum where the painting currently is. Image:Rotterdamse Schie 1611.jpg is a detail of a map made in 1611 van Floris Balthasarsz. van Berckenrode, which is also in the description tag. Hanhil 17:27, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you could simply list where you got the painting; the URL, if online, or the book which you scanned it from. That's it, and you can erase the tag. Patstuart 17:30, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Rantisi.png

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Rantisi.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Polarlys 16:23, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded the file believing that the copyrightstatus was already checked by the German wikipediacommunity. I don't have other sources than already provided in the German page. Hanhil 18:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rhodesiancoatofarms.png

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Rhodesiancoatofarms.png has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Lokal _Profil 21:42, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This picture came from the English Wikipedia. A vector version (Image:Rhodesian coat of arms Sag.svg is available, deletion is no problem. Hanhil 18:17, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Flag Maasland.png

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 16:11, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Hanhil!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:50, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BD Districts Gopalganj.svg is uncategorized since 28 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:50, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:BD Districts Gazipur.svg is uncategorized since 28 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:50, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:BD Districts Faridpur.svg is uncategorized since 28 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:50, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Emmaplein.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

Ze zijn nu voorzien van een categorie. Hanhil (talk) 10:08, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soviet flag on the Reichstag roof unaltered.jpg

File:Soviet flag on the Reichstag roof unaltered.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Cecil (talk) 09:06, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bonegilla camp 1954.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:34, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

File tagging File:GüzelçamlıHaliminTepesi.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:GüzelçamlıHaliminTepesi.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:GüzelçamlıHaliminTepesi.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

It seems that this file needs a confirmation e-mail from its copyright holder(s) in order to be hosted on Commons. It is the case for any copyrighted logo or content coming from an identified website or publication. The copyright holder (maybe it's you, maybe not) should send us an e-mail in this form to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. When the e-mail has been sent, please apply {{OTRS pending}} on the image page (in the "permission" field) to tell us so (and to prevent the file from being deleted). Please don't ignore this message, contact me instead if you want to discuss the issue or if you have a question about the procedure. Eusebius (talk) 19:48, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This file was originally uploaded to the English wikipedia by en:User talk:Cretanforever. I asked him to have a look at it. Hanhil (talk) 18:01, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Penmaenmawr Prom 001.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:21, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Pieter Winsemius.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:54, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

File:KAEC_Gate,_Saudi_Arabia.JPG

File:KAEC_Gate,_Saudi_Arabia.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 06:46, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arboretum Trompenburg in Kralingen

Dag Hanhil, ik zag dat je bij Category:Arboretum Trompenburg Parks in Rotterdam hebt veranderd in Parks in Kralingen. Inderdaad ligt het in de deelgemeente Kralingen-Crooswijk van Rotterdam. In het Wikipedia artikel over Kralingen wordt niets over het arboretum vermeld. In de Wikipedia artikelen over het arboretum wordt telkens Rotterdam vermeld. Het lijkt mij het beste om in Commons ook "Parks in Rotterdam" te laten staan en in het Wikipedia artikel over Kralingen het arboretum te vermelden. Wouter (talk) 13:04, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zoals je aan de bewerkingen kan zien heb ik geprobeerd de Rotterdamse foto's zo specifiek mogelijk te categoriseren. Op de "Rotterdamse" pagina's stonden vaak honderden foto's per categorie en stond alles door elkaar heen, van Charlois en Hoogvliet tot Overschie en Kralingen. Wanneer er voldoende afbeeldingen zijn voor een subcategorie heb ik die aangemaakt. Op die manier heb ik de categorie Parks in Rotterdam ook verder opgesplitst; Parks in Kralingen in een nieuwe subcategorie van Parks in Rotterdam geworden.
Hanhil (talk) 13:20, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canada British Columbia location map 2.svg

You haven't gotten the regional district boundaries quite correct. You need to split the Comox Valley Regional District away from the Strathcona Regional District on Vancouver Island. -- Denelson83 (talk) 09:36, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This map is derived from File:Canada_British_Columbia_location_map.svg. I left User NordNordWest a message. rgds, Hanhil (talk) 15:35, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canada British Columbia location map.svg

Hello and thanks for the hint! It's corrected now. NNW (talk) 16:09, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your quick response. I also uploaded a new version. Thks, Hanhil (talk) 16:39, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Otrokovice znak.png

File:Otrokovice znak.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-kloin- (talk) 13:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Permission for photo usage

Dear Hanhil,

for our student textbook about Charles Darwin we want to use your nice map of Joggins Cliff. We kindly ask you for permission to use your photo. Of course your name appears in the list of figures together with a hint of the licence conditions. With best regards Paul

Prof.Paul Wrede Charité-Universitätsmedzin Berlin Molekularbiologie und Bioinformatik Arnimallee 22 14195 Berlin (Germany) paul.wrede@charite.de --Paul wrede (talk) 16:18, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Normalerweise habe ich damit keine Probleme; ich weiss aber nicht um welche Abbildung es sich handelt. Falls es sich um File:Canada Nova Scotia location map 2.svg handelt: es ist abgeleitet von File:Canada Nova Scotia location map.svg, erstellt von de:Benutzer:NordNordWest. Meiner Meinung nach sollte NordNordWest in diesem Fall sagen wie er dazu steht. Er hat auf jeden Fall diese Abbildung unter der Lizenz CC BY-SA 3.0 veröffentlicht. MfG Hanhil (talk) 21:31, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Erlaubnis für Karte Joggins Cliff

Sehr geehrter Hanhil, für unser Buch zu „Charles Darwin: Die Entstehung der Arten“, illustriert und kommentiert von Paul Wrede und Saskia Wrede, bitte ich um die Genehmigung zur Veröffentlichung der Karte zu Joggins Cliff, Nova Scotia, die ich aus dem Internet habe. Unser Buch erscheint in einem naturwissenschaftlichen Verlag und wendet sich an Studenten der Anfangssemester der Biologie sowie weiterer Lebenswissenschaften und an interessierte Laien. Das Buch erscheint in Deutschland, der Schweiz und Österreich voraussichtlich im Dezember 2012. Mit den besten Grüßen

Paul Wrede

Prof. Paul Wrede Charite-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Institut für Molekularbiologie und Bioinformatik Arnimallee 22 14195 Berlin (Germany) paul.wrede@charite.de --Paul wrede (talk) 15:55, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Siehe oben unter Permission for photo usage: gleiche Frage, gleiche Antwort. Hanhil (talk) 19:16, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SFA004000743.jpg

Dag Hanhil, meent u dat deze afbeelding kan hiernoemd worden? Lotje (talk) 06:25, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dat lijkt me geen probleem. Ik heb er alleen geen ervaring mee. Hanhil (talk) 13:56, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Station Hofplein 1930.jpg

File:Station Hofplein 1930.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 21:34, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Hanhil

Contents

Boodschap bij Image:Hendrik Conscience.jpg

Boodschap bij Image:Cornelis Felix van Maanen.jpg

Boodschap bij Image:Rotterdamse Schie 1611.jpg

re: Image:Hendrik Conscience.jpg

Image Tagging Image:Rantisi.png

Image:Rhodesiancoatofarms.png

Image:Flag Maasland.png

Tip: Categorizing images

File:Soviet flag on the Reichstag roof unaltered.jpg

File:Bonegilla camp 1954.jpg

File tagging File:GüzelçamlıHaliminTepesi.jpg

File:Penmaenmawr Prom 001.JPG

File:Pieter Winsemius.jpg

File:KAEC_Gate,_Saudi_Arabia.JPG

Arboretum Trompenburg in Kralingen

File:Canada British Columbia location map 2.svg

File:Canada British Columbia location map.svg

File:Otrokovice znak.png

Permission for photo usage

Erlaubnis für Karte Joggins Cliff

File:SFA004000743.jpg

File:Station Hofplein 1930.jpg

Navigation menu

User talk:Hanhil

Boodschap bij Image:Hendrik Conscience.jpg

Boodschap bij Image:Cornelis Felix van Maanen.jpg

Boodschap bij Image:Rotterdamse Schie 1611.jpg

re: Image:Hendrik Conscience.jpg

Image Tagging Image:Rantisi.png

Tip: Categorizing images

File tagging File:GüzelçamlıHaliminTepesi.jpg

Arboretum Trompenburg in Kralingen

Permission for photo usage

Erlaubnis für Karte Joggins Cliff

Navigation menu

Search