Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-gdm-theme/checkout/bluecurve-gdm-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-gdm-theme/checkout/bluecurve-gdm-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the classic Bluecurve GDM theme that was shipped in late versions of Red Hat Linux and early versions of Fedora Core.
rpmlint is silent package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok license file: must be included spec language: ok spec readable: yes upstream sources: no upstream yet buildable: ok ExcludeArch: n/a BRs: must add perl(XML::Parser) locales: ok shared libs: n/a relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok %file: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: ok content: permissible large docs: n/a %doc: ok header files: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a shared libs: n/a devel package: n/a libtool archives: n/a gui apps: n/a directory ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok should the Requires: fedora-logos be Requires: system-logos instead ?
adding COPYING and BuildRequires. We want fedora-logos because the theme is Fedora branded by design. Well, maybe. The other gdm themes definitely. Bluecurve is debatable actually. What do you think?
Well, it doesn't actually use a *trademarked* logo (this is just the old Fedora font on a big blue background, right?)
Okay, yea, let's make this one system-logos then.
No, I mean if it's not trademarked, you can just put the graphic in the theme. Or leave it in fedora-logos, either or.
ah right, that's even nicer
I made the change suggested in comment 5, fwiw (and the similar change for the kdm theme)
Approved
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bluecurve-gdm-theme Short Description: Bluecurve-gdm-theme Owners: rstrode,davidz Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no
done