LaunchRounds
A Product Hunt alternative: your website becomes a launch draft, you review it, and the product joins an upcoming round with a founder profile.
Submit an AI tool or AI software for review and inclusion in a directory of 59 AI marketing tools. There is no account to create, and every submission is read by a person.
Submitting here also puts your tool in front of the people behind our other directories. They cover different ground, so the same entry reaches people who would not have found you on any one of them alone.
A Product Hunt alternative: your website becomes a launch draft, you review it, and the product joins an upcoming round with a founder profile.
An AI tools directory on a DR 60 domain, read by people already researching AI software.
Each of those placements is made by hand, so give them a few days to appear.
Submitting a tool takes a couple of minutes. The review that follows is the same one every entry on the list goes through, whether we found it or you sent it in.
Any AI software a marketing team would pay for, including generative AI tools for writing, images and video. Every entry is filed under the marketing job it does, so the quickest way to know whether yours fits is to find its job below:
If your tool does a marketing job that is not on this list, submit it anyway and say which job it does. If it is not built for marketers at all, it is likely to be declined, and we will tell you so.
Reading these before you send the form is the fastest way to know whether it is worth your time.
Anyone can sign up and use it today. A waitlist, a demo video or a landing page with an email capture on it is not yet a product we can describe.
The tool does something a working marketing team would pay for: content, search, ads, social, lifecycle, analytics, creative, or the operations around them.
A public pricing page, or plan limits stated somewhere we can link to. "Contact us for pricing" on its own leaves nothing to record in the entry.
Feature and limit claims trace back to documentation, a changelog or the pricing page. We cite sources on every entry, so anything we cannot source does not go in.
This site is a compilation rather than a review board. There are no scores, no verdicts and no ranked order, so a submission is not a competition you either win or lose. It is a pointer at a tool we might not have found, and what happens next is research.
The answers you send tell us where to look. The entry itself is written from the pricing page, the documentation, the changelog and whatever independent coverage exists, because those are the things a reader can check for themselves. That is also why an entry sometimes records a limit or a caveat the submission did not mention: we describe the product as published, not as pitched.
Where something is unclear, we ask rather than guess. A short reply with a link to the right documentation page usually settles it.
The readers here are marketers researching software they are about to pay for. A tool can be genuinely good and still be wrong for this list: developer tooling, consumer apps and general business software all get turned down regularly. If yours is one of those, we say so plainly rather than leave the submission sitting unanswered.
The other common decline is timing. Products that have not shipped yet cannot be described accurately, and an entry written from a landing page ages badly the moment the real thing launches. Send it again once it is out.
Fill in the form at the top of this page: the tool name, its link, your name, your email and a few lines on what the tool does and who it is for. A person reviews the submission within two working days and replies either way. If the tool fits, an entry is written from its published sources and you get an email with the live link.
Yes, as long as marketers are the people using it. Generative AI tools for copy, images, video, ad creative and social content make up a large part of the list. A general-purpose generator with no marketing use case is usually declined.
Yes. Send the form once for each tool, so each submission gets its own review and its own reply. Separate plans or editions of the same product only need one submission.
No. There is no account, login or vendor dashboard. You submit through the form on this page, and the review, the reply and any later corrections all happen by email.
No. It is a directory: each tool is described from its published sources and linked, but nothing is bought or sold through the site. Submitting works the way it would on a marketplace in one respect only: you send the tool in, and it is reviewed before anything appears.
Submissions are read by a person, usually within two working days. You get a reply either way, including when the answer is no, so you are not left waiting on a queue that never moves.
No. Most submissions that get turned down are turned down for one of two reasons: the tool has not shipped yet, or the audience is not a marketer. Developer tooling, consumer apps and general business software get declined here even when they are good, because the readers of this site are researching marketing software.
Each listing records what the tool does, its documented capabilities and limits, who it suits and who it does not, what it costs to run once usage and add-ons are counted, and a source for every pricing and limit claim. It is filed under the marketing job it does.
We read it, then research the tool the same way we research anything else on the list: the pricing page, the documentation, the changelog, and whatever independent coverage exists. The entry is written from those sources rather than from the description you send, which is there to point us at the right things.
No. Entries are not sent to vendors for sign-off, because an entry a vendor has approved is advertising rather than a compilation. If something in a published entry is factually wrong, tell us and it is corrected the same day.
The entry links to your tool, and that link carries rel="nofollow", as every outbound link on this site does. What a listing gives you is a dated, independently written entry that marketers find when they are comparing tools for a job.
Send the change to [email protected] with a source we can check. Pricing changes, renamed plans and discontinued products are all worth flagging, and the entry is updated with a fresh verification date.
Prefer email? [email protected]