witchcraft investigation of Margaret Burges (Q112795959)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
historical event recorded in 16th-18th century Scotland
- Case of Margaret Burges
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | witchcraft investigation of Margaret Burges |
historical event recorded in 16th-18th century Scotland |
|
Statements
A woman diagnosed Margaret as the cause of a bewitchment. (English)
The main accusations against her involved fall out from work, cloth, rent payment, debt, etc. Her thirteen year old female servant was questioned about whether or not Margaret had kissed her. She said yes, many times and she had kissed back. Not sure exactly what was meant by this line of questioning? The investigation and trial resulted from a backfire of Margaret's attempt to clear her name of witchcraft with slander litigation. The kirk session hearing the case decided there was enough evidence to petition the privy council for a commission of justiciary. She was also implicated, on 3 October 1628, by Elspeth Baird, burnt for witchcraft in Leith. These were in revenge for quarrels.A funny note: Margaret claimed that her lease had been eaten by a dog. Her case seems to have resulted from a backfire from Margaret's pursuit of a slander case after she had been called a witch. The Kirk session of Cramond was convinced by the evidence of the defendants (i.e. the 'slanderers'), and decided to apply for a commission of justiciary from the Privy Council, which they received. (English)
2 references