White Papers
Raise the Bar: Setting New Standards
for the eCOA Industry
Electronic Clinical Outcome Assessments (eCOA) can offer significant benefits for clinical research, including increased patient compliance, enhanced data quality, and streamlined data access.
However, despite being in use for decades, eCOA adoption lags behind that of other clinical trial systems. Why? Traditional eCOA solutions have frustrated sites and study teams: lengthy (16+ week) build times, operational complexity, and siloed systems put eCOA on the critical path to study start and database lock.
As a result, rather than increasing uptake of eCOA, some organizations are reverting to traditional paper-based COAs for non-pivotal studies due to the perceived ease of implementation.
A paradigm shift is necessary to fully realize the potential of eCOA. The following standards outline a new approach to meet the challenges head-on, reduce the complexity of eCOA delivery, and drive greater efficiency in clinical trials.
1. Centrally Controlled Library of Pre-Validated eCOA Instruments
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fd3f/2fd3f28e4e79b4619a9eb1b94f6d52723f77ac6a" alt=""
Instrument code libraries have long been used to accelerate eCOA build times. However, these libraries require extensive manual intervention, validation, and version control for each study. In addition, sourcing appropriate instrument versions, obtaining author approvals, and managing translations adds complexity and risk. While these rudimentary libraries offer some time savings, they deliver minimal impact on build times.
A centrally controlled repository to manage validated eCOAs eliminates the need for study-by-study customization during build. All available instruments, translations, versions, and license status can be viewed and instantly added to new studies. This enterprise library approach removes the need for manual build and validation and enables a more holistic strategy for eCOA use across the organization.
LEGACY APPROACH Code / Content Libraries |
NEW STANDARD Centrally Controlled Library |
---|---|
Basic content library: No / limited version control |
Central library management and control: Create, validate, and manage eCOAs centrally for all studies |
Code and content copy-pasted study-by-study: Not validated or controlled, leading to inconsistency in eCOAs across studies |
Pre-validated with license holder review: Fully reusable assessments, so no need for custom configuration |
Reuse and edit the last study build: Requires customization and not validated or controlled |
Transparent: Complete visibility of version, license, and translation status |
Uncontrolled: Requires same level of author review as build-from-scratch |
Controlled: Pre-validated to reduce author review and licensing cycle time |
Limited visibility: No ability to view eCOAs across the organization |
Central hub for eCOA collaboration: Study teams can view their organization s complete eCOA portfolio |
Benefits
- Accelerated Build Times: A pre-validated instrument library significantly reduces development time and effort.
- Rapid Mid-study Changes: Protocol amendments are not subject to lengthy build, validation, and approval cycles.
- Improved Author Collaboration: Gain licensing status visibility and protect author copyright, reducing the need for repeated approvals.
- Simplified Translations Management: View all available languages and translation versions.
2. On Demand Study Configuration and Management
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fd3f/2fd3f28e4e79b4619a9eb1b94f6d52723f77ac6a" alt=""
eCOA management slows down study teams. From initial build and mid-study amendments to data access, teams rely on vendors to prepare what they need, resulting in extended timelines, increased costs, and potential delays in study initiation and conduct.
By shifting to an on-demand model, study setup and management become dynamic processes. Teams can access real-time information, make datadriven decisions, and quickly implement changes to improve study efficiency and agility.
LEGACY APPROACH | NEW STANDARD |
---|---|
Study Configuration | |
Design specification required to begin development | Interactive design process enables build to begin directly from the protocol |
Only eCOA mock-ups available for review until build is near complete | Preview actual eCOAs across all device types throughout the build process |
Manual screenshot generation for site review and IRB/ethics packs | Auto-generated screenshot documents |
Study Management | |
Mid-study changes require additional build cycles | Rapid implementation of mid-study changes without the need for lengthy build cycles |
Paper-based data change request (DCR) process | Real-time, self-service DCRs with complete audit trails |
Manual mid-study data access requests | On-demand data exports throughout the study |
Lengthy site and user setup process | Self-service site and user setup |
Benefits
- Enhanced Stakeholder Collaboration: Interactive build process engages stakeholders early and reduces costly iterations.
- Reduced Risk: Continuous visualization throughout the build process helps derisk validation and user acceptance testing (UAT).
- Continuous Data Access: On-demand exports support eCOA data and adherence analysis, alongside EDC and other data sources.
- Increased Efficiency: Automation and self-service capabilities eliminate manual processes and optimize study resources.
3. Single App for all eCOA Studies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fd3f/2fd3f28e4e79b4619a9eb1b94f6d52723f77ac6a" alt=""
Traditional eCOA solutions create a new patient app for every study, often for both iOS and Android operating systems, which extends build timelines and increases management complexity. Each app must also be assessed 3-4 times yearly due to operating system updates.
Mid-study amendments require site approval that further delay updates. Sites must individually contact participants to request app updates, leading to multiple app versions in use across the study.
The move to a single app for each operating system enhances operational efficiencies by reducing build, approval, and management requirements.
When mid-study updates are required, sites independently approve the new app version, triggering automatic app updates for their patients. This reduces the tech support burden on sites, accelerating app updates and minimizing the number of versions in circulation.
LEGACY APPROACH | NEW STANDARD |
---|---|
New app must be built from scratch for each study | Single patient app for all studies streamlines build and amendments |
Delay while waiting for app store approval | App already approved in the app stores |
Mid-study updates must be approved by all sites prior to release | Independent site approval of app updates |
Sites must ensure participants install app updates | Site approval triggers automatic app updates for their patients apps |
Certificate of translation required for full app every time | Core elements do not need a certificate of translation for every study |
Limited app functionality due to complexity of study-by-study build | Ability to scale functionality |
Apps must keep pace with operating system updates, which becomes harder over time | Single app to maintain and keep up-to-date for each operating system |
Benefits
- Increased Efficiency: Simplified build, deployment, and mid-study amendments streamlines operations for sites and study teams.
- Enhanced Control: Greater visibility and control over app versions and updates.
- Future Scalability: Simplified app management and maintenance supports long-term scalability.
4. Complete Visibility Throughout the Study
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fd3f/2fd3f28e4e79b4619a9eb1b94f6d52723f77ac6a" alt=""
eCOA systems limit data and study progress visibility. Sites cannot see important actions, next steps in the study, or real-time patient responses. Study teams must wait for vendor input, which leads to delayed issue identification, increased workloads for all stakeholders, and potentially compromised decision-making.
Real-time visibility into study progress, key performance indicators, and patient-level data allows study teams to effectively monitor study execution. With interactive dashboards and self-service data access, users can track eCOA status and compliance, identify emerging trends, and anticipate potential challenges. Built-in workflows ensure sites have the necessary information to manage their responsibilities and monitor patient progress efficiently.
LEGACY APPROACH | NEW STANDARD |
---|---|
Data is siloed and inaccessible in disconnected eCOA systems | All patient data is immediately accessible to both the site and sponsor |
Limited inbuilt site workflows, reports, dashboards, and data access | Sites access easy-to-consume patient data with workflows and actionable dashboards to review scoring, KPIs, and upcoming actions in real time |
Study teams reliant on vendor processes to access data | On-demand data access for study teams throughout the study |
Limited ability to track study compliance | Real-time dashboards to track site and patient compliance |
Benefits
- Improved Site Performance: Real-time access to patient data and next steps enhances site experience and compliance.
- Proactive Study Management: Real-time dashboards allow proactive issue identification and resolution.
- Better Decision Making: Comprehensive visibility empowers stakeholders to make faster, informed study decisions.
- Faster Database Lock: Effective monitoring and issue resolution accelerate data review.
5. Site-Optimized eCOA Solutions
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fd3f/2fd3f28e4e79b4619a9eb1b94f6d52723f77ac6a" alt=""
Historically, eCOA solutions added extra burden to sites and their workflows. Sites manage multiple trials, devices, and systems, while also providing technical support and switching between systems during patient visits. These challenges, combined with difficult-to-navigate systems and duplicate data entry, mean paper COAs are often preferred by sites. This trend back to paper can erode data quality, accuracy, and traceability.
To enhance the site experience, it is critical to design easily navigable systems that align with site processes. This includes fully integrating systems to trigger actions and automate information transfer. Additionally, enabling eClinRO completion within the eCOA web portal removes the need to switch between devices during patient visits. A BYOD-first approach further reduces device management and support needs.
LEGACY APPROACH | NEW STANDARD |
---|---|
Device setup and management | |
Sites manage, store, and provide patient tech support for provisioned devices | BYOD-first approach reduces the provisioning and tech support burden |
Separate tablet for eClinRO on every study | Complete eClinROs within the eCOA management portal (no need for a separate device) |
Systems | |
Too many systems and logins | Single login across all studies and sponsors |
Limited flexibility for sites to use existing systems | Ability to use site-owned systems, such as email, teleconferencing, and calendars |
Restricted information flow across siloed systems | Connected systems centralize eCOA management for sites |
Workflows | |
Siloed systems require duplicate data entry | Automated transfer of patient data between systems |
No clear workflow path for sites to follow | Easy navigation, including automatic workflow paths across systems |
Benefits
- Improved Site Performance: Automated tasks, simplified processes, and streamlined device management lighten manual and unfulfilling work.
- Reduced Errors: Automated data transfer and workflows minimize human errors.
- Improved Data Quality: Eliminated duplicate data entry increases data quality and consistency.
6. Flexible Service Models
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fd3f/2fd3f28e4e79b4619a9eb1b94f6d52723f77ac6a" alt=""
eCOA solutions are typically delivered through a fully managed service model with limited sponsor visibility and control during the build process. Similarly, study management activities, such as data extracts and reporting, rely heavily on vendor services. Fully managed service models reduce eCOA scalability and create bottlenecks throughout the study.
Flexible service models allow organizations to choose from a fully managed vendor-led solution, a service provider-managed approach, or a self-sufficient model. A scalable SaaS platform underpins all options, providing the infrastructure for efficient study build and management. Insights dashboards and ondemand access to data enable teams to create an accurate picture of study progress in real time, alongside other clinical data sources.
LEGACY APPROACH | NEW STANDARD |
---|---|
Inflexible service models | Flexible service models |
Vendor-build only | Optionality for self-build, service provider-build, or vendor-build |
Scheduled data extracts | On-demand study management |
Study-by-study silos | Enterprise-wide utilization |
Benefits
- Increased Sponsor Control: Greater flexibility and predictability of eCOA management across studies.
- Accelerated Timelines: Standardized components and self-service options reduce build times and increase study management efficiency.
- Cost Efficiency: Enterprise-wide adoption increases reusability and optimizes resource deployment.
Time to Take eCOA off the Critical Path
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fd3f/2fd3f28e4e79b4619a9eb1b94f6d52723f77ac6a" alt=""
For too long, eCOA solutions have burdened study teams. Industry can no longer afford to keep doing things the way they have always been done. It s time for a new approach that takes eCOA off the critical path and drives faster, more efficient trials. It s time for study teams to realize the full potential of eCOA and deliver a better experience for sites and patients.
New Standards to Simplify eCOA Implementation and Management
LEGACY APPROACH Limited eCOA adoption |
NEW STANDARD Scalable eCOA adoption |
|
---|---|---|
Study-by-study customization | Study Build | Centrally controlled library of pre-validated eCOA assessments with translations |
Inefficient build processes and lengthy mid-study support cycles | Study Management | On-demand study configuration and ongoing management |
New app for every study | Study App | Single app for all studies |
Inaccessible, siloed data | Data Accessibility | Self-service data access for sites and study teams |
Complex, disconnected systems increase site workload | Site Experience | Streamlined, user-friendly workflows for a better site experience |
Study-by-study, service-heavy approach | Service Model | Flexible service model with optionality to self-build or outsource |