Ruling system of Khilafah vs.

Democracy

Ideology: Creed and Systems

Every Ideology has a set of fundamental concepts known as Creed from which specific Systems emanate

Systems

Creed (Aqeeda)

Ideology: Creed and Systems

Ruling system
Economic system Creed (Aqeeda) Judicial system Social system Education Policy

Systems emanating from the Creed

Foreign Policy

Creed: A comprehensive idea about life and what is beyond it

Relationship

Before Life

Man, Life, Universe

After Life

Relationship A comprehensive thought must answer following questions What is man, life and the universe? Where did life come from (What is before life)? What happens after death (What is after life)? What is mans purpose in life (What is the relationship of this life with that which preceded it)? What is mans motivation to fulfil his purpose in life (What is the relationship of this life with whatever is after life)?

Secularism
One can believe In a Creator(s)

Man, Life, Universe

One can believe in life(s) after death

Secularism professes the following concepts Instead of arriving at a conclusion based on enlightened thinking regarding the existence of a Creator, the idea of secularism advocates a compromise. Hence one can believe in the existence of a Creator and the Hereafter if he wants or reject it altogether. They refuse to accept any role of the Creator in life affairs even if He exists. Mans purpose in life, his motivation to carry out actions, his behaviour with others and himself would be defined by man himself rather than the Creator. The peoples representatives would decide, based on majority, as to how the society should organize its affairs; how should people carry out economic, ruling and social transactions etc. Lawmakers should legislate upholding freedom, equalities and national interest.

Capitalist Framework

Secularism
Freedoms & Equalities Morality Interest & benefit

Majority

Economic

Ruling

Social

Judicial

Education Policy

Foreign Policy

Islamic Aqeedah
Accountability Day of Judgment Heaven, Hell

Allah

Man, Life, Universe

Commands of Allah
Islamic Aqeedah is based on enlightened thought Islam requires its followers to answer these basic questions using ration and intellect. Hence the existence of the creator is proven with definite evidence, so is the proof of Quran being the word of the Creator. Messengership of Muhammad (saw) follows from the proof of Quran According to Islamic Aqeedah Allah has given us clear guidance as to what is Mans purpose of Life and what should be his motivation to fulfil it. Mans purpose in life is to worship Allah by following His commands in all aspects of life. Mans motivation to follow Allahs commands is the knowledge that he would be accounted on the Day of Judgement. A Muslim seeks the pleasure of Allah and strives for eternal paradise whilst saving himself from Allahs displeasure and Hellfire.

Islam: Sources of Legislation

The primary sources of Legislation are: Quran Sunnah There are two other sources indicated by the primary sources Ijma us-Sahaba Qiyas with illa Shariya

Aqeedah Quran (Nass) Sunnah (Nass) Ijma us-Sahaba

Qiyas

Islam: Extracting Systems from Creed

Aqeedah
Quran Sunnah Ijma us-Sahaba Qiyas

Ijtihad (Only for Zanni text)

Economic

Ruling

Social

Judicial

Education Policy

Foreign Policy

Ruling System:

Islam has legislated laws organise mans three relationships

Creator
Laws related to organizing Mans three relationships are not up for debate or discussion Man with Creator Man with Man Man with himself Akhlaq

Ibadat

Man
Muamilat

Man

Relationship with the Creator

Praying Fasting Hajj Zakat Tahajud Recitation of Quran Nawafil
Creator

Ibadat

Man

Relationship with other Human Beings

Husband and wife (Nikah) Buyer and seller Ruler and Ruled Ahkamaat related to Partnership Prohibition of forcibly converting non-Muslims Not killing women and children during Jihad Pacts and treaties Prohibition of owning public property Taxation Dress Code in public Rules related to inheritance and Custody

Man
Muamilat (In private and in Public)

Man

Relationship with oneself

Personal Cleanliness Rulers related to Clothing Ahkam related to foodstuff The way to cut ones nails, hair etc. Putting on perfume Akhlaq (Harsh, Proud, Humble) Honesty Being careless or responsible

Man

Rules related to Malboosat (dress code) Matomat (foodstuff) Akhlaqiyat (morals)

Ideology: Creed and Systems

Khilafah Capitalism
Islam obliges the Muslim to use his mind Secularism is not based on mind rather it is to believe in Allah and forbids imitation in built on a compromise between the Clergy and Aqeedah. the Philosophers Islam calls to look deeply in the universe to Instead of coming up with a rationally correct understand its law and to be guided to the conclusion of the questions secularism compels belief in the existence of a Creator 1 man not to discuss the issue that if there is a Creator and does He have any relationship with this life, rather settles it by finding a middle path in the form of a compromised solution Hence Islam trains a Muslim to always look for the correct solution irrespective of the odds against him and not to compromise on principles for perceived worldly benefits. This produces a society with high moral values seeking the truth (Haq) Capitalism guides its adherents to seek a compromised solution in their lifes affairs as well, rather than the correct solution. This is why we hear quite frequently the phrase lesser of the two evils in all Capitalist states. The correctness of any Ideology is gauged by its creed since it the creed from which all the systems emanate and it is the creed which provides the intellectual basis on which all thoughts are build. Islamic Aqeedah is the only correct creed since it is the only creed which convinces the mind

Progress: The relationship of Creed and Systems

For any nation to progress she has to implement a system which is in harmony with their fundamental beliefs and concepts i.e. her Creed
Current System:

Interest is allowed Insurance is legal Constitution protects freedoms National Interest supersede Allahs ahkam

Pakistan is implementing a system which is in conflict with the creed of the overwhelming majority Creed: Interest is Haram Insurance is Haram People are not free, they are slaves of Allah Allahs ahkam set our National interests

Hence a sizeable cross-section of society refrain from participating in system deeming it contradictory to Ahkam of Islam, which results in weak implementation of system

the the the the

Putting Pakistan on the road of progress

There are two possible ways to put Pakistan on the path of progress: Option 1: People change their Aqeedah (Creed)
The people should become secular in their belief and implement the capitalist system in its entirety, without any reservation or holding back

Option 2: People should implement a different system

A system that exclusively emanates from their aqeedah, upon whose implementation they do not feel any emotional or religious resistance within themselves and whose protection they will consider a part of their aqeedah.

Option 1, doesnt seem to be a practical and possible option. It is highly un-likely that people in an overwhelming majority would leave their aqeedah when they know that their belief is the correct one Only the second option is a workable solution since Islamic aqeedah dose give rise to a system. Hence progress cannot occur until we implement a system completely emanating from the sources of Shariah

Adopting from other Ideologies and Civilizations]

There is a difference between the thoughts related to Aqeedah matters i.e. doctrines and Shariah rules, and the thoughts related to sciences, techniques, industries and the like We are not allowed to take Aqeedah matters as well as laws and principles related to systems and view point towards life from any other system, ideology or civilization. Thoughts such as democracy, privatization of public resources, freedom of expression etc are not to be taken as Allah has given us clear and precise Shariah rules in all the above matters. We can adopt administrative means and styles as Umar (ra) adopted the system of Diwan from the Romans We are allowed to adopt and learn anything related to science and technology or use tangible objects such as tanks, airplanes etc. as long as it doesnt contradict Shaiah rules

Ruling System
(Nidham ul Hukm fil Islam)

Establishing the Khilafah is an Obligation (Fardh)

Evidence:

From Quran

Evidence:

From Sunnah

Evidence:

From Ijma as-Sahabah

Evidence:

From Shari Principle

Evidence:

What Islamic ruling system is not:

Monarchical
Ruling is not hereditary and Khaleefah is chosen by Muslims Khaleefah has no special privileges The Khaleefah is accountable and can be punished by law if found guilty He is not the symbol of the Ummah where he owns and does not rule nor is he a symbol who rules and runs the affairs of the people and country as he pleases. He is not the source of legislation rather he has to implement Shariah whether he likes it or not

Republican:
The Sovereignty belong to the Shara not the Ummah Neither the Ummah nor the Khaleefah has the right to legislate The Khaleefah is bound to adopt rules for the constitution and cannons that are extracted from Quran and Sunnah Though Ummah has the right to elect the Khaleefah but they do not have the right to remove him as long as he implements Shara. The system does not determine the Khaleefahs term of office. This is rather determined by his implementation of Shara.

Ruling System:

What Islamic ruling system is not:

Imperial:
Each region is considered an indivisible part of the State. Ruling authority and systems are same for all regions Same laws for all citizens throughout the state with no distinction of race, language or creed. Non-Muslim citizens has the full rights and duties that a Muslim citizens has. It does not make the regions under its rule into colonies, areas of exploitation, nor a source of wealth funneled back into the central region for its own benefit. It is for this reason that the areas outside Hijaz flourished and became centers of learning, trade and enlightenment unlike the colonies of the west during the colonization period.

Federal:
Shape of ruling is that of unitary not federal. The Wilayat have no autonomy in ruling, economy, military or so like whatsoever Funds are spend equally on subjects of Wilayat, regardless of their Wilayah The Khaleefah is the one who appoints army commanders, the Wulah, rulers, finance and economy officials, judges and everyone whose duty is to rule

Ruling System:

The distinguishing feature of any Ruling System

Ruling system

Who appoints and removes the ruler ?

Who legislates and makes decisions?

Who legislates and makes decisions?

Ruling System:

Democracy is in contradiction with Islam

Democracy and Khilafah are in contradiction in terms of : Source of Legislation Democracy: Human mind (Freedoms, Moralities, Equalities) Khilafah: Devine Revelation (Quran, Sunnah, Ijma, Qiyas) Process of Legislation Democracy: Majority Khilafah: Looking for the strongest Daleel through the process of Ijtehad Mind can never give a system which could organize mans relationships correctly: Man and his Creator Husband and Wife Father and Son Sister and Brother Ruler and the ruled Ruler and minorities Balance between man/woman rights and responsibilities

Sources of legislation

Ruling System:

Source of Legislation
Khilafah Democracy
1) Quran Human mind, freedoms, Human Rights and national interest and not Islam are the 2) Sunnah sources of legislation. 3) Ijma as-Sahaba and 4) Qiyas The parliament has the authority to make laws are the only sources of legislation. from any source or adopt it from any creed. It is the responsibility of the State to prove that they have adopting laws from none other It is the responsibility of the people and than the Shariah sources. Islamic Ideological Council to waste time in No law can be taken from any other system or proving the contradiction with Islam. creed since Islam is not silent on any issue Furthermore, councils decisions are not dealing with human relationships and society. binding. These laws pertain to all systems such as Economic, Ruling, Social, Education, Judicial and Foreign Policy. Precious time is wasted in showing contradiction with Islam such as in the Riba case. Gives rise to a system full of contradicting laws emanated from various creeds and system. Such as blasphemy laws and freedom of expression, Sharia Courts and non-Sharia courts, Islamic provisions and non-Islamic provisions etc.

Ruling System:

Islamic Framework

Aqeedah
Quran Sunnah Ijma us-Sahaba Qiyas

Ijtihad (Only for Zanni text)

Economic

Ruling

Social

Judicial

Education Policy

Foreign Policy

Ruling System:

Capitalist Framework

Secularism
Freedoms & Equalities Morality Interest & benefit

Majority

Economic

Ruling

Social

Judicial

Education Policy

Foreign Policy

Process of legislation

Ruling System:

Process of decision making in a household

In a Home

1 Should the children Drink alcohol

2 Which Cardiologist should the mother be taken to

3 Where should the family spend the summer vacation

Ruling System:

Process of decision making in a household

Question # 1: The matter is not up for debate or discussion. Allah has already decreed alcohol to be Haram. Hence it is unlawful for the father to ask family members opinion for allowing or disallowing it Question # 2: The father can take suggestions from the members of the family who are knowledgeable as Allah has made this matter Mubah for us to chose. Hence the father can take suggestions from his Doctor son or her educated daughter. But he would avoid discussing the matter with his un-educated son or his young child who dont have substantial knowledge in the issue. After this consultation he reserves the right to make a decision what he feel is good for the family Question # 3: In this matter the father can have a voting and follow the majority decision. As every member is capable of making this simple decision and Allah has allowed Muslims to chose any halal recreation

Ruling System:

Process of decision making in a State

In a State

Mubah Issues

Legislative Decision Making

Mubah Issues in which Ummahs representatives are generally knowledgeable

Mubah Issues which need expertise and insight

Ruling System:

Process of decision making in a State

Legislative Decision Making

Ruling System:

Legislative Decision making

Khilafah
No one is allowed to legislate except Allah1
Allahs laws are automatically the law of the land. Khaleefah does not have any choice but to implement them nor do they require endorsement by the majority of the representatives to become the law of the land. 2

Democracy
The people are the origin of the Law
People are led to believe that sovereignty belongs to Allah but actually the will of the majority prevails. For implementation of Shariah, Allahs laws are to be produced before the representatives in the form of a bill who have the choice to accept or reject. Hence practically Creators laws need approval of the creation to become the law of the land. Hence we hear terminologies such as Shariah bill etc.

The Khaleefah implements Allahs laws derived only from Quran, Sunnah, Ijma asSahaba and Qiyas, through the process of Ijtehad.
The Khaleefahs personal choice or the whims of the majority of the Majlis-e-Ummah bears no weight in the process of Ijtehad.

Evidences

"Verily, Ruling is only for Allah" [Yusaf: 40]

"The judgment is His, and to Him you shall return." [28:88]

Those who do not judge by what Allah hath revealed, They are the Unbelievers [5:44]

So judge between them by what Allah hath revealed, and follow not their vain desires, diverging from the truth that hath come to thee [5:48]

But no, by the Lord, They can have no (real) Faith, until They make Thee judge In all disputes between them, and find In their souls no resistance against Thy decisions, but Accept them with the fullest conviction. [4:65]

It is not fitting for a Believer, men or women, when a matter has been decided by Allah and His Messenger to have any option about their decision [33:36]

Evidences
2. For those who think that consultation should be on all matters sighting the ayah: " And do consult them in the matter [Al-Imran: 159] we say that duties (Wajibaat), and prohibitions (Muharramaat) and the divine rules explained by the Shar'a and specifically stated by it, have no place for human opinions and there is no scope for consulting about them. It is not for the believer (male or female) that when Allah and His Messenger have decided a matter that they should have any choice in their matter. [TMQ 33:36], "And rule between them by that which Allah revealed to you, and do not follow their whims, and beware that they may deviate you away from some of which Allah revealed to you." [TMQ Al-Maidah:49] , "And whatever the Messenger brought to you take it, and whatever he forbade you of leave it." [AlHashr: 7]. The Messenger of Allahs (saw) said: None of you will be a (true) believer until his desire follows that which I have come with (i.e. Islam). These evidences are explicit in making the sovereignty for the Laws of Allah (swt) and not for the Ummah. Hence Allah has ordered consultation in matters which are Mubah not in legislative matters. Democratic process of legislation which is based on majority votes of the representatives, is a kufr concept, completely alien to Islam.

Ruling System:

In Khilafah majority is not always authority

1. Consultation is the right of the Ummah and Allah has recommended the ruler that he consults the people in running the affairs of the State. But consultation (Shura) deosnt mean that its majority opinion has to be binding on the Khaleefah. The Aya which encourages Shura (consultation) gives the final verdict to the Messenger i.e. the ruler of the state.

And consult them In affairs, then, when you have taken a decision put Thy trust In Allah (Al-Imran: 159) 2. The Messenger of Allah (saaw) rejected the overwhelming majority of the Sahabah on the day of Hudaibiya and accepted the truce with Quresh saying: "I am Allahs servant and His Messenger, I shall not go against His commandment and He will not make me the loser. This shows that when it comes to Hukam of Allah majority has no bearing. So Allahs laws do not need majority endorsement to become the law of the land.

3.

Abu Bakr (ra) fought the apostates as well as those who refused to pay Zakah and sent Osama (ra) army to fight the Romans all at the same time, rejecting the unanimous opinion of the Sahaba who opposed taking all these expeditions at once. This shows that the majority opinion of the Sahabah was not binding on the Khaleefah i.e. Abu Bakr (ra) and he implemented his opinion rejecting the majority.
Similar situation was seen when Omar (ra) implemented his opinion of levying Kharaj on the lands of Iraq rejecting Bilal (ra) and the opinion of a number of Sahabah.

4.

Ruling System:

Implications
Since the Khaleefah doesnt have any legislative powers he cannot be blackmailed or pressurized to make laws by the Majlis-e-Ummah, lobbies or masses

PM could be dictated by pressure groups, multinational Comps., IMF, WB. PM will be under pressure from peoples desires, not from Allahs Ahkam
Man made laws will always have a bias towards the interests of the legislators or the interest of their colonial masters. In democracy peoples taxes and lives are used to secure the interests of the corrupted elite, as was done by the oil lobby in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars Only divine laws give justice to all Hence Democracy is the Dictatorship of the Elite Rule of Law only possible in the Khilafah

Ruling System:

Legislation of Allah is applicable even today

Creator
Laws related to organizing Mans three relationships are not up for debate or discussion Man with Creator Man with Man Man with himself These laws do not change with time and space. Hence Shariyah is for all times Akhlaq

Ibadat

Man
Muamilat

Man

Ruling System:

Process of decision making in a State

In a State

Mubah Issues

Legislative Decision Making

Mubah Issues in which Ummahs representatives are generally knowledgeable

Mubah Issues which need expertise and insight

Ruling System:

Process of decision making in a State

Mubah Issues

Mubah Issues in which Ummahs representatives are generally knowledgeable

Mubah Issues which need expertise and insight

Ruling System:

Administrative Laws and Implementation details

Khilafah Democracy

A) Mubah Issues about which Ummah is generally A) Mubah Issues about which Ummah is knowledgeable and expert opinion is not needed: generally knowledgeable: Majority opinion of the representatives of the Ummah Peoples representatives to decide what is is binding on the Khaleefah. good for them. B) Mubah Issues which needs expertise and insight: After consultations with the experts and people of B) Mubah Issues which needs expertise and insight: insight Khaleefah makes the final decision. He is not bound by the majority opinion of the experts rather he The Cabinet makes strategic decisions but would look for the strongest opinion. For example to the parliament has the right to overrule deal with water crisis, should the government build them by voting against it. four small water dams or just one big dam.

The representatives of the Ummah can account him and ask for justification but their majority opinion is not binding.

Evidences
Category A: On the day of Badr the Messenger of Allah (saaw) consulted an expert of war Habab bin Al-Munthir (ra) in choosing the place of the Battle of Badr. He accepted his opinion and implemented it without even considering consultation with other great Sahaba. Category B: This view is derived from the Messengers adherence to the majority opinion to leave Madinah to confront the Mushrikeen army at the Battle of Uhud, although his opinion and those of senior Sahabah was to stay in Medinah and not to go out. It is also derived from his saying to Abu Bakr and Umar. Had you agreed together on a consulted matter I would have not disagreed with you. [Narrated by Ahmed from Ibnu
Ghanam bin Al- Ashari]

Ruling System:

Implications
The Ummahs representatives provide positive input that helps smooth running of the state Taking majority opinion who are not experts in the issue is senseless. Hence only experts are consulted and final decision rests with the elected Khaleefah In Khilafah, matters concerning the well being of the society that requires technical expertise cannot be politicised by political parties by manipulating the ignorance of the common people

Ruling System:

Example of Decision making in Khilafah

In a State

Administrative Laws and Implementation details

Should Oil and gas wells be privatized

Should the Nuclear reactor be built at Chashma

Should the state first build motorway or fix the sewage system

Ruling System:

Decision making in Khilafah

Decision making
Legislative Allahs Ahkam Are implemented derived from the sources, Quran, Sunnah, Ijma us Sahaba Qiyas People Through their representatives decide based on majority
Economic Ruling Social Judicial Education Policy Foreign Policy

Mubah (General issues)

Mubah (needing expertise) Khaleefah is final authority after discussing with experts

Ruling System:

Decision making in Autocracy

(dictatorship of an individual)

Decision making
Legislative
Mubah (General issues) Mubah (needing expertise)

The ruler

The ruler

The ruler

Economic

Ruling

Social

Judicial

Education Policy

Foreign Policy

Ruling System:

Decision making in Democracy

(dictatorship of an elite group)

Decision making
Legislative Mubah (General issues) Mubah (needing expertise)

Elite Group

Elite Group

Elite Group

Economic

Ruling

Social

Judicial

Education Policy

Foreign Policy

Ruling System:

Islamic Democracy: The biggest hurdle in implementation of Islam

No law is enacted even in an Islamic Democracy without the consent of the majority. Hence Allahs Hukam becomes law of the land subject to the endorsement of the 51% Riba is legal in Pakistan even though there is a clear Hukam of Allah just because the legislators in the parliament have not made it Haram. This shows who has the sovereignty in Pakistans constitution Voting on a Hukam of Allah to accept or reject it as being the law of the land, is absolutely HARAM. This process gives man the right to say Yes or No to Allahs Hukam whilst a Muslims doesnt have any right to have any say once Allah has legislated a matter

It is not fitting for a Believer, men or women, when a matter has been decided by Allah and His Messenger to have any option about their decision

Ruling System:

Pakistans Constitution is a Secular Constitution

Article 227 of 1973 Constitution of Pakistan which is sited to prove that this Constitution is Islamic, states: No Law shall be enacted which is repugnant to such injunctions [i.e. Islamic injunctions] Afghanistan and Iraqi constitution, which is drafted by none other than the Americans themselves, have articles very similar to the article quoted above: "no law can be contrary to the sacred religion of Islam" (Afghanistans Constitution: Article 3) "No law that contradicts the established provisions of Islam may be established" (Iraq's Constitution: Section One, Article 2(A) ) US added these articles to deceive the sincere elements in the legal jargons, knowing fully well that this article will not give rise to Islamic legislation The above articles are completely un-Islamic. As all of them allow the parliamentarians to enact laws from other than Quran and Sunnah and do not restrict them only to Shari sources. Hence it is up to the people to prove whether these are repugnance to Islam or not. The correct legal clause should be: "Legislation cannot be taken from any source other than Qur'an, Sunnah, Ijma-e-Sahaba and Qiyas"

Ruling System:

Comparison: Ummah Council vs. the Parliament

Khilafah Democracy
Does not have the right to legislate Legislate laws for all the people The majority opinion when sought in non-technical issues is binding such as matters related to ruling, economy, education etc There opinion regarding intellectual matters that require investigation and scrutiny is not binding, such as the technical and the financial matters together with the affairs of the armed forces and foreign policy. Accounts the ruler in all matters Accounts the ruler in all matters The majority can revoke an already taken decision or step where UC opinion was binding e.g. ruling, education, domestic affairs etc. UC can discuss and guide the Khaleefah in issues related to foreign affairs and technical matters but their majority opinion cannot revoke Khaleefahs decision. Majority is authority and hence is Qazi Mazalim settles the difference between Khaleefah and UC implemented over these issues. Its verdict on the matter is binding.

Ruling System:

Implications

Real representation is only possible in the Khilafah Rule of Law only possible in the Khilafah

Corruption: An inherent feature of Democracy

Democracy leaves the door open for foreign influence in the Political and Ruling system Islam protects minority rights while democracy leaves it to the whims of the majority

Ruling System:

Real representation only Possible in Khilafah

Khilafah
Since the elected representatives of the Ummah council do not have any powers to legislate and nor do they have the blackmailing card of ejecting the Khaleefah at their will. They also dont get legalized bribes in the form of developmental budget. This makes the post unattractive for the corrupt and the selfish. They find no reason to invest millions of rupees in election campaigns to represent the poor people Hence the representative post is not a ruling or a legislative post rather their job is to only account the ruler and convey the grievances/suggestions of the people to the Khaleefah

Democracy
The process of law making gives parliamentarians the authority to make laws to protect their personal interests rather than the interests of the people whom they are supposed to represent. It is for this reason they increase their pay almost every year while the masses starve.

The real representation can only happen in the Real representation is not possible in Khilafah democratic system

Ruling System:

Rule of Law only possible under Khilafah

Khilafah Democracy
As the Khaleefah cannot change the laws he In democracy laws are legislated to protect cannot make himself above the law the elite from even being summoned to the court In our history there have been numerous
incidents where the Khaleefah or his son were summoned to the court and judge passed judgment against them According to the Article 248 of the Pakistani constitution President, PM, Chief Minister and governors cannot be summoned to court in connection to their responsibilities

Khaleefah cannot change the judge if he is Recently Bush has passed a law according to hearing a case against the Khaleefah

which investigators and the government cannot be legally sued by detainees abducted under terrorism allegations

Ruling System:

Corruption: An inherent feature of Democracy

In Democracy corrupt are attracted towards politics like the bees are attracted towards nectar
Professional politicians invest millions of rupees in elections and rear Ghundas, to keep sincere people out of the political arena The corrupt know that the only way to protect themselves is to be in the ruling post and legislate laws which will legalize their corruption Peoples taxes and lives are used to secure the interests of the corrupted elite, as was done by the oil lobby in the Iraq and Afghan wars recently

In Khilafah the corrupt have almost no incentive to join the political medium
Professional politicians find no reason to invest millions as they cannot legislate laws to their benefit or influence the Khaleefah with vote of no-confidence Members of Majlis-e-Ummah are not rulers hence they get no developmental budget As a result Political system gets cleaned from corrupt people

Ruling System:

Influence of foreign powers in the Political system

Khilafah Democracy
Since in the Khilafah, even the Khaleefah has Whenever man will be source of legislation no right to change Allahs laws or go against foreign powers will try to influence him and them, therefore colonialist find no advantage make laws in their favour in pressurising him in doing something for Colonialist forces pressurise an individual in which he has no powers a dictatorship and an elite group in a Khaleefah Abdul Hameeds response to Lord democracy to make laws for their interests Herzal is best example Musharraf was asked if he is with the US or Hence by taking the right of legislatioin against them. He supported the US to kill away from man Allah has actually relived Muslims of Afghanistan. And then under democracy the parliament passed 17th man from such types of foreign pressures. Amendment to legalize all the Haram Hence Multinational companies or powerful actions done by Musharraf such as giving lobbies cannot pressurise the Khaleefah as he US bases, providing them with logistic has no powers to legislate laws in their favour support, handing away 500+ Muslims to the US etc. Hence the Khilafah System ties the hands of the Khaleefah so much so that even an agent PM could be dictated by pressure groups, Khaleefah cannot hurt the Muslims they way multinational Comps., IMF, WB and will be an agent ruler in a dictatorship or democracy under pressure from peoples desires, not can hurt the masses from Allahs Ahkam Dictatorship and Democracy are two sides of the same coin

Ruling System:

Minority rights
In democracy as the legislation belongs to the people hence the majority can curtailing rights of the minorities whenever they wish: US Patriot Law (anybody can be thrown in jail by simply labelling him as terrorists) Women are not allowed to wear Hijab in public school In Holland face covering in public place is illegal In Britain a person can be detained for about a month without providing any proof Nobody can file a law suite against US authorities if detained under certain terror law Free Worlds glairing example of liberty and civil rights: Guantanamo Bay In Khilafah, since man doesnt legislate hence it is not up to the Khaleefah or the majority of the representatives to abrogate or suspend the rights of the citizens no matter which political group, ethnicity, religion or gender he belongs to Hence the rights of the non-Muslim citizens are set on stone and nobody can change them. It was for this reason we still find millions of Christian and Jews living in the Muslim world where Muslims have ruled for Centuries. But one cannot find a single indigenous Muslim of Andalusia (Spain) Christian citizen of the Khilafah fought along side Muslim armies against the Crusaders as they were happy under Muslim just rule

Ruling System:

Difference of Opinion and How to resolve it

Khilafah Democracy
In Quran and Sunnah there are two types of texts. Difference of Qatai (definitive-no two interpretation) opinions are resolved based on Zanni (Ijtehad is needed to arrive at the Hukam of Allah) Majority of the Only in Zanni text one can have difference of opinion. Muslims are allowed legislatures. It is to follow any valid Ijtehad whether they do it themselves, if they are capable, or follow any Mujtahid. not the peoples majority as it Khaleefah adopts the strongest Ijtehad and implements it over all the people in societal or system related issues such as: happened in the Iraq crisis in Economic, ruling, social, education, Judicial systems and foreign policy various western Some other issues such as Zakat, Jihad etc countries. Islam obliges Muslims to obey the ruler leaving their own Ijtehad in these issues. Hence the sharai principle ruling of the Imam alleviates the difference of opinion is accepted by old and new scholars alike. There is not much difference among various school of thoughts as for the systems of the state are concerned. Everyone consider Riba, obscenity as haram, amputating thief's hands as Fard, guarating basic needs as obligatory etc. Any shade of Islam would be much more acceptable for Muslims than the kufr being implemented today in the form of Capitalist system

Ruling System:

The distinguishing feature of any Ruling System

Ruling system

Who appoints and removes the ruler ?

Who legislates and makes decisions?

Ruling System:

The distinguishing feature of any Ruling System

Who appoints and removes the ruler ?

Ruling System:

Appointment of the Ruler

Khilafah
Khaleefah must have seven conditions Muslim Sane Free Male Mature (Baligh) Adl (opposite of fasiq) Is capable of ruling (Qadir)

Democracy
The ruler should have qualification as pronounced by article 62 & 63 of the constitution Muslim Mature Graduate Good Muslim etc.

The Khaleefah is appointed either by the people directly or through their People elect the parliament which in turn elects the Prime Minister through voting representatives

Ruling System:

Appointment of the Ruler

Khilafah
Mahkamat ul-Mazalim will short list the nominees taking into account the basic contractual conditions for being a Khaleefah The Majlis-e-Ummah, in its capacity as the representative of the Ummah, will short lists the nominees twice: first to six and then to two nominees. This will be done after receiving the list of nominees from the Mahkamat ul-Mazalim.

The Muslim members of the Majlis-e-Ummah will vote on the two candidates to elect one for the post of the Khaleefah
All the members of the Majils-e-Ummah will give the contractual Bayaa to the person getting maximum votes. It is due to this Bayaa the elected person becomes the Khaleefah of all the Muslims of the world. The Muslims in general will give the Baya'a of obedience to the contracted Khaleefah as long as he acts according to the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger.

Ruling System:

Time duration of the Ruler

Khilafah Democracy
Like marriage and financial contracts, He is elected for a limited time of 5 years Khilafah contract is also not timebound. Khilafah contract is between the Needs peoples endorsement in the form of re-election to continue his Ummah and the Khalifah for ruling rule over the people according to Islam. Hence as long as he fulfils these The duration could be even reduced through a no confidence vote which conditions he will continue to be a the representatives can carry out any Khalifah. time purely on their whims and desires The pertinent question to be asked is; After all why does a good rulers should rule only just for five years and a bad rulers should stay for five long years? The secular democracy can not develop such a mechanism as they have no divinely revealed fixed and absolute criteria's for all what is good and all what is bad for humanity.

Ruling System:

The Ummah cannot eject the Khaleefah

Ruling System:

The Ummah cannot eject the Khaleefah

Ruling System:

Impeachment of the Ruler

Khilafah Democracy
Khaleefah can be impeached anytime by The Parliament can kick PM out of the the courts if he implements Kufr or fails to office by passing a No Confidence vote. fulfil his contractual conditions The ruler continues to be a ruler even though he fails to implement Islam or fulfil his election promises as long as he is - Capability to rule - Male keeping the parliamentarians happy - Adl (not fasiq) He may be impeached even though if he is Sane a good ruler, if the parliamentarians dont - Muslim - Free like his policies - Mature If the courts fail to do so then the Ummah No such provision in this system should gather strength in order to impeach him by force. Khilafah is a much stable Political system, whereas in Democracy political instability is created through Vote of No-Confidence, horse trading etc. PMs primary concern is to keep the parliamentarians and pressure groups happy rather than Allah Legalised bribery is introduced to forge stability, such as awarding ministries to forward blocks, allocation of funds etc. Khilafah's only concern would be to implement Islam and make sure that he fulfils his contractual conditions

Ruling System:

Impeachment of the Ruler

Ruling System:

Accountability of the ruler

Khilafah
Peaceful Individual Group (Political Party) Majlis-e-Ummah Qadi Mazzalim

Democracy
Peaceful individual Group (Political Party) Parliament Courts

Fighting with Sword (material force) With Sword (material force) The whole Ummah is obliged to fight No such concept him with sword (material force) if he rules with clear kufr for which there is not even a weak daleel from Quran and Sunnah This physical use of force keeps the ruler in check from implementing Kufr. In the 1300 years of Khilafahs history we have had Khulafaa who did Zulm but accountability was so thorough that even these rulers were not able to change the law of the land and implement Kufr and rule by other than Islam.

Evidence:

Peaceful accountability

Evidence :

Accountability with Sword (Khurooj)

Ruling System:

Severity of the accountability

Khilafah Democracy
Accountability is fard on the Ummah as People have the option to either account the Nahi anil Munkar 1 ruler or chose to keep quite under the pretext of freedom of expression All the political parties in Khilafah are There are ruling and opposition parties both securing there personal and group interests. working to put Khalifah in check for implementation of Islam and act as a vanguard of Islam over Khalifah.

This religious obligation makes accountability in Khilafah stronger than democracy

Ruling System:

Implications
Better accountability in Khilafah system than Democracy

Democracy: Blackmailing, Horse-Trading, Maintains the Status quo

Khilafah is a more stable System than Democracy Provincialism and Ethnic rivalries are an integral part of a Democratic system

Ruling System:

Accounting far stronger in Khilafah than Democracy

Accounting is an obligation in Islam (Amr bil Maroof and Nahhi unil Munkar)
In Islam accounting is an obligation. Even if it is dangerous a Muslim has to account the ruler In democracy accounting is a right and it is up to the people to account or keep quiet if it is dangerous

People could be bared from accounting

In Democracy government can legislate laws to stops people from various cross-sections of the society from accounting the rulers such as Civil servants, Army officials, students etc. In Khilafah this cannot happen as Allah has ordained every individual of the society to under take Amr bil Maroof and Nahhi unil Munkar.

In democracy judiciary could be bared from accounting

In democracy laws can be enacted which can stop the judges and the common people from taking the government to court. One such law was the 17th Amendment under which no court can hear a case challenging Musharrafs conniving with the US in killing Muslims of Afghanistan as well as handing over of more than 500 Muslims to the US. Under Article 248 of the Pakistani Constitution President, PM, Governors, Chief Ministers cannot be brought to court in connection with their responsibilities

Accounting will based on Islam not peoples whims and desires

In Khilafah the criteria of accounting is Islamic laws but in democracy the members of the parliament can eject the rulers purely based on their whims and desires even if the ruler is good

Accounting with sword

In Khilafah if the Khaleefah implements Kufr then he must be stopped through peaceful means such as verbal accounting and judiciary. But if he fails to stop then he must be fought and removed from this post. This is the strongest form of accounting which doesnt exist in democracy. In Democracy if the ruler is violating the constitution and the judiciary cannot stop him the people have no option but to wait until his term passes provided he doesnt get himself re-elected as was the case with Musharraf. Hence in all practical terms people have no way to stop this Munkar (vice)

Ruling System:

Blackmailing, Horse-Trading and Maintaining of the Status quo

Vote of No-Confidence gives rise to various problems:
Leg-pulling and negative politics where the people are the really victims Blackmailing by pressure groups and lobbies specially when the government is formed through collation. A minority starts dictating the Majority Legalized corruption and Horse-Trading
Government resorts to Horse-Trading and legalized bribery such as developmental budget for the MNAs in order to keep its majority in the parliament

Ties the hand of a good ruler and maintains the status quo
As an example, a good ruler cannot dare implement Islamic laws related to Agricultural land which will distribute land properly as he runs the risk of vote of No-Confidence from the Jageerdars (big landlords) present in the parliament. Hence anything challenging the status quo would be checked by these elite group already present in the parliament

Gives rise to a very unstable system in which the rulers primary focus shifts to protecting his rule by keeping the majority in the parliament happy rather than implementing Islam or taking care of the affairs of the people PM will be under pressure from peoples desires, not from Allahs Ahkam

Ruling System:

Khilafah is a more stable System than Democracy

In Khilafah, the representatives do not have the dictatorial powers to remove the Khaleefah and he continues to be the Khaleefah as long as he implements Islam and fulfils his contractual conditions. As a result:
Khaleefah cannot be blackmailed or pressurised Khaleefah doesnt need to bribe the representatives to keep the majority No Leg-pulling or destabilizing politics as long Islam is being implemented Liberates the Khaleefah to implement Islam and not the whims and desires of the people

If the Khaleefah fails to implement Islam and tries to become a legislator (dictator) he is impeached. If the judiciary fails to impeach him then it is the responsibility of the people to bring him down physically even if they have to fight him and his followers
Due to the above reasons Khilafah is far more stable system than Democracy

Ruling System:

Provincialism and Ethnic rivalries

In Democracy the limited term of the ruler gives rise to provincialism and ethnic divisions
When the ruler knows that he has to go for re-election this produces, in his mind, undue importance of the majority and insignificance for the minority Hence through out their rule they tend to favour the majority over the minority, giving rise to provincial disharmony and ethnic divide

In Khilafah since the representatives cant terrorize the Khaleefah by vote of Noconfidence and he doesnt have to go for re-election every 5 years, he is under no pressure from the majority areas to prefer them on the cost of minority area. This produces equality amongst the people of all the provinces and ethnic groups in the eyes of the Khaleefah. He knows that as long as he implements Islam and fulfils the basic needs of all the citizens of the Khilafah he will continue to be the Khaleefah It is for this reason that there has never been ethnic or cultural divide amongst the Muslims accept the later part of the Othmani Khilafah in which colonialist played a major role in inflaming nationalism

Important features of the Political Structure

Ruling System:

Political Structure
Khilafah Democracy
Centralized Ruling De-centralized Ruling The Islamic political system is neither a President federation nor a confederation of states. Prime Minister Rather, its authority is centralized Cabinet making it one entity with a central leadership Legislative Assembly The authority of the Khaleefah cannot Provincial Autonomy be distributed among a council or a Shura as some suggest De-centralized Administration De-centralized Administration Provincial Govts. Walis Local Govts. Aamils Accountability much stronger in Khilafah than in Democracy Since the ruling is centralised hence Khaleefah cant brush away criticism by playing helpless and powerless as happens in Democracy. Everybody points a finger at each other, hence people cant pin anybody down to fix a problem. Federal Govt points to the Provincial Govt. and vice versa.

Ruling System:

One State for Muslims or Multiple Nation states

Khilafah Democracy
Single State Multiple Nation States One Ameer al Momineen, (Khaleefah, Conflicting National Interests of Imam) for all the Muslims. different countries is hampering the unified approach of the Muslim Ummah It is not allowed for the Muslims to be divided into statelets 2

Khilafah produces political unity among the Muslims.

It is only because of Nation State concept Muslim land, armies and resources are used against fellow Muslims.

Ruling System:

One State for Muslims or Multiple Nation states

Ruling System:

Political Structure
Khilafah
Institutions of Khilafah system Khaleefah Muawin Tafweedh (Delegated Assistant) Muawin Tanfeez (Executive Assistant) Walies (Governors) Ameer ul Jihad Internal Security The foreign affairs Industry The Judiciary The administration system (the peoples affairs) Bait ul-mal (the state treasury) Media Majlis al-Ummah

Democracy
Institutions of Parliamentary Democracy Executive Prime Minister Cabinet Governors

Civil Servants & Bureaucracy

Legislature National Assembly Senate Judiciary

Ruling System:

Political Hierarchy (Flow Chart)

Majlis-e-Ummah
Elected by the people to represent them Short lists nominees for Khaleefah Scrutinize newly adopted laws and decision of the Khaleefah Make the Khaleefah change the Walies

All Citizens of Khilafah

Ameer Al-Jihad Delegated Assistant

Khaleefah
Muslim citizens Elect the Khaleefah
Executive Assistant
Elected directly by the Ummah Or By Muslim members of Majlis-e-Ummah

Judiciary

The State Departments

Governors

Internal Security

Industry

Heads the military Responsibl e for their training

Has all powers of ruling like the Khaleefah Has to report to Khaleefah after taking an action. His ruling can not contradict the adoption of Khaleefah

Only has executive powers No ruling powers Implements rulings of the Khaleefah and brings him feedback from the Ummah

Three types of qadies, Qadhi Aam, Qadhi Mohtasib, Qadhi Mazalim

A body of the people which executes the Islamic States orders

Qadhi Mazalim can impeach the Khaleefah. During the hearing the Khaleefah cannot remove the Qadhi

Motor vehicle dept. Zakah Collection dept. Marriage and divorce dept. And others

Appointed by the Khaleefah Assists the Khaleefah in ruling and implementing Islam in the province Distributes income to public and collects funds for the State

Police and other law enforcing agencies

Heavy Industry geared towards supporting Jihad.

Ruling System:

Political Environment
Khilafah Democracy
Islam obliges every individual to be In democracy one is not obliged to be politically aware. This produces a politically aware. political environment which keeps the ruler in check. It is achieved through following means Multiple Political parties Media Education system Certain cross-sections are prohibited Nobody is barred from political activity from participating in Politics All civil servants Nobody is allowed to make parties or Students organizations from basis other than Teachers Islam

Ruling System:

Rules regarding Political Parties

Khilafah Democracy
No permission required to establish political parties, rather There is a ruling it is Fard Kafaya to establish it party/coalition and an opposition. There is no such thing as ruling party or opposition party The opposition works to Every political party gives allegiance to the Khaleefah and remove the government is required to obey him in private and public as long as he through constitutional rules by Islam. means i.e. No-confidence vote, or extra-constitutional Every party has the right to voice her opinion and work to means like agitation, civil build public opinion for it disobedience, strikes. It is obligated (Fard) for every political party to account the Political party may account ruler and build awareness and build public opinion against the ruler or chose to keep the unjust acts of the ruler quiet under the principal of freedom of expression Political parties are not allowed to destabilise or weaken the authority of the Khaleefah as long as he is implementing Islam Political parties are responsible in maintaining public opinion for the implementation of Islam and strengthening the system

Ruling System:

Islam forbids a Police State

Khilafah Democracy

Islam forbids harming the Muslims and Pakistani Police is known for its torture spying on them There are number of Pakistani agencies monitoring Muslims day in day out Obedience to the Muslim ruler who governs Muslims armies and police are bullied to with Islam is compulsory abduct and kill Muslims under the guise of War against terror There is no obedience in sin Accounting the rulers is fard upon the Muslims Muslim armies are trained to say Yes Sir and do or die for all orders