Paul L. Schumann, Ph.D. Professor of Management MGMT 440: Human Resource Management
Paul L. Schumann, Ph.D. Professor of Management MGMT 440: Human Resource Management
Outline
What Is Incentive Pay? Why Use Incentive Pay? Does Incentive Pay Work? Drawbacks of Incentive Pay Incentive Pay Systems
Piece-Rate Taylor Plan Standard Hour Plan Commissions Merit Pay Bonuses Skill-Based Pay Profit Sharing Gain Sharing Plans Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs) Executive Compensation
2
The reward for performance doesnt have to be pay Pay is one possible reward, not the only possible reward
3
High valence: employees must believe that the amount of the reward (incentive pay) is large enough to be valued High instrumentality: employees must believe that there is a strong link between their job performance and their rewards High expectancy: employees must believe that there is a strong link between their effort and their job performance
Effort Performance Rewards Low valences: the reward (the amount of the incentive pay increase) is too small to be valued Example: Supervisor tells a salesperson If you double your sales from $1-million to $2-million, Ill reward you with a pay increase from $50,000 a year to $50,100 a year. Example: Suppose the budget allows for pay increases up to 4% when inflation is 3%: if all the employees get a 3% pay increase (for inflation), then the employees with the best job performance might only get an additional 1%
Effort Performance Rewards Poor instrumentality perceptions Example: The supervisor gives everyone the same pay increase regardless of differences in job performance Example: The supervisor does a poor job of evaluating employee job performance Example: The supervisor plays favorites and gives the biggest pay increase to the employee who is the supervisors golfing buddy even though that employee has poor job performance
7
Effort Performance Rewards Poor expectancy perceptions Example: The employees believe that they are already working as hard as they can Example: The employees believe that there are barriers to improved job performance that are outside of their control
Summary: For incentive pay to work: we need to make the incentive pay increase large enough that employees want to put forth the effort to go after the incentive and we need to show employees that there is a strong link between their job performance and receiving the incentive pay increase and we need to show employees how, through their efforts, that they can successfully improve their job performance Put another way, employees need to believe: If they work at it, theyll achieve their goals, and theyll get the promised reward
9
Unions typically oppose many types of incentive pay Fear of discrimination or favoritism by supervisors in job performance evaluations, especially for subjective measures of job performance
Unions prefer objective factors, such as across-the-board pay increases or the use of seniority
worker solidarity (solidarity is necessary for union success) Unions might agree to group-based objective incentives
Market pay = $12 per hour Average hourly production target = 60 pieces per hour Piece-rate = $12/60 = $0.20 per piece 50 pieces 50 $0.20 = $10.00 (below market pay) 60 pieces 60 $0.20 = $12.00 (market pay) 70 pieces 70 $0.20 = $14.00 (above market pay) 80 pieces 80 $0.20 = $16.00 (above market pay)
$12 per hour plus $0.20 per piece for production over 60 pieces in an hour 70 pieces $12 + [(70 60) $0.20] = $12 + [10 $0.20] = $14.00
11
Production standard = 60 pieces per hour Piece-rate #1 = $0.20 per piece if production is less than 125% of the production standard (1.25 60 = 75 pieces per hour) 60 pieces 60 $0.20 = $12.00 (market pay) 70 pieces 70 $0.20 = $14.00 Piece-rate #2 = $0.25 per piece on production over 60 pieces if production equals or exceeds 125% of the production standard (1.25 60 = 75 pieces per hour) 80 pieces (60 $0.20) + [(80 60) $0.25)] = $17.00 Recall the straight piece-rate ($0.20) paid $16 for 80 pieces
Note this makes the reward for exceeding 75 pieces bigger (increased valence), which strengthens the motivational force
12
Method: For a job title, make a list of possible tasks For each task, establish a standard length of time that it should take to complete the task Base pay on the standard times, not actual clock times Example: Auto mechanic Market pay = $20 per hour Task: balance & rotate 4 tires Standard = 30 minutes = 0.50 hours Pay for task = $20 per hour 0.50 hours = $10.00 (no matter how long it actually takes the mechanic to do the task) Mechanic takes 15 minutes or 60 minutes Pay = $10
13
Example: Market pay = $50,000 Sales target = $1,000,000 Commission rate = 50,000/1,000,000 = 0.05 = 5.0% Sells $900,000 Pay = $45,000 (below market) Sells $1,000,000 Pay = $50,000 (market) Base pay plus commission
14
Measure the relevant results & behaviors of the employee Objective measures of employee job performance: production measures, sales measures, personnel data, performance tests, business unit performance measures Subjective measures of employee job performance: rating scales to subjectively measure multiple aspects of job performance Management By Objectives (MBO)
5 = Excellent = 4.0% pay increase 4 = Very Satisfactory = 3.0% pay increase 3 = Satisfactory = 2.0% pay increase 2 = Unsatisfactory = no pay increase 1 = Very unsatisfactory = no pay increase
Merit pay might be combined with a forced distribution Merit pay is widely used in the US Merit pay is used at all organizational levels
16
Supervisors can make mistakes in evaluating employee job performance & in assigning merit pay increases The mistakes weaken the instrumentality perceptions Effort Performance Rewards Reduces the motivational effectiveness of the incentive pay system The mistakes create perceptions of inequity (unfairness) If employees feel underpaid, they may reduce their contributions (reduce their effort)
17
The annual merit pay increase can come months after specific instances of good performance Rewards are more effective when they are received immediately after the desired behavior or result The delay in receiving the reward will weaken the employees instrumentality perceptions
Effort Performance Rewards Reduces the motivational effectiveness of the incentive pay system
18
Differences in merit pay increases may be too small to be meaningful Example: Current pay = $50,000; Suppose: Top performers: 4% merit increase $2,000 pay increase Middle performers: 2% merit increase $1,000 pay increase Some middle performers may believe that the extra $1,000 per year isnt worth the extra effort required to become a top performer
At 2,000 annual work hours, the $1,000 difference works out to an extra $0.50 per hour when theyre making over $25 per hour
Result is low valences Effort Performance Rewards Reduces the motivational effectiveness of the incentive pay system
19
Merit pay budgets can vary from year to year Result is that the same job performance may get different rewards depending on whether its a good year or a bad year If the same job performance is rewarded differently from one year to another, then:
If good-performing employees feel under-rewarded in the bad years when merit pay increases are smaller, then employees may reduce their contributions (reduce their effort), especially in the bad years
20
Merit pay increases become part of the employees base pay in future years, even if the employees job performance isnt so good in the future years We end up continuing to reward the employee in the future for job performance that might have been years in the past Example:
2005 new hire pay = $50,000 at end of 2005, performance rating = 5 merit pay increase = 4% ($2,000) 2006 pay = $52,000 at end of 2006, performance rating = 3 merit pay increase = 2% ($1,040) 2007 pay = $53,040 at end of 2007, performance rating = 1 no merit pay increase 2008 pay = $53,040 the employee is still being rewarded in 2008 (and beyond) for performance in 2005 & 2006
This weakens the instrumentality perceptions Effort Performance Rewards Reduces the motivational effectiveness of the incentive pay system
21
Example: Salespersons goal is to achieve at least $2-million in sales Example: Companys goal is to achieve earnings-per-share of at least $3.15
The bonus amount does not become part of the employees base pay Example: 2005 new hire pay = $50,000 at end of 2005, performance rating = 5 bonus = $2,000 total pay = $52,000 2006 pay = $50,000 at end of 2006, performance rating = 3 bonus = $1,000 total pay = $51,000 2007 pay = $50,000 at end of 2007, performance rating = 1 bonus = $0 total pay = $50,000 2008 pay = $50,000 This strengthens the instrumentality perceptions Effort Performance Rewards Increases the motivational effectiveness of the incentive pay system
22
Example: New hire receives initial training to perform the entry-level job and is paid at the entry-level rate As the employee completes training and becomes qualified to perform additional jobs, the employee is rewarded with pay increases The employee is typically paid at the pay rate associated with the highest paid job for which the employee has been qualified regardless of which job the employee actually performs on any given day Creates incentives for employees to complete training, learn
new skills, & become qualified to do additional jobs Creates a flexible workforce
23
employees
Example:
Company establishes a minimum profit level as a goal If actual profits exceed the goal, a percentage of the excess is divided up among the employees Current distribution plans (cash plans): profit sharing paid as a bonus in the form of cash or shares of the companys stock Deferred payout plans: profit sharing paid as a bonus into a trust fund to be distributed to employees at some time in the future (such as when the employee retires, becomes disabled, or dies) Combination plans
24
improves the organization, a percentage of the organizations gain from the suggestion is shared with the employees who made the suggestion
Example: Employees make suggestions Management reviews the submitted suggestions, determines the improvement (gain) from each suggestion, and decides which suggestions to implement A percentage of the gain from a suggestion is shared with the employees who made the suggestion Types of gain sharing: Scanlon Plan, Rucker Plan,
See Fisher, Schoenfeldt, & Shaw (2006), Table 12.5, p. 553, for a comparison of the types of gain sharing
25
As a bonus directly to employees Example: for every 2 shares an employee buys, the company gives the employee 1 share Example: employees can buy shares for 85% of the current stock market price
26
Be tied to the performance of the company through incentive pay systems such as bonus plans for the achievement of shortrun goals (such as profits) And use the granting of shares of stock in the company or stock options for the creation of long-run incentives
27
Outline
What Is Incentive Pay? Why Use Incentive Pay? Does Incentive Pay Work? Drawbacks of Incentive Pay Incentive Pay Systems
Piece-Rate Taylor Plan Standard Hour Plan Commissions Merit Pay Bonuses Skill-Based Pay Profit Sharing Gain Sharing Plans Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs) Executive Compensation
28