Group Dynamics
Group Dynamics
DYNAMICS AND
SOCIAL
FUNCTIONING
WHAT IS A GROUP?
A group could be defined as two or more individuals who share
certain characteristics, interact with each other and/or share
some common identity or objectives.
Groups vary in size from dyad (2 members), triad (3 members), tetrad (4
members), to pentad (5 members), and to very large aggregations, such as
mobs, audiences and communities (i.e., the University of Lagos community).
Goals: Every group has particular goals that drive its existence.
Groups
Audiences, Men,
Families, Co-workers,
queues, Africans,
close teams,
crowds, Nigerians,
friends, crews,
social Lesbians,
small study
movement, Doctors,
cliques, etc. groups, etc.
etc. etc.
SOCIAL GROUPS?
A social group can only be a group to the extent that its members have something in
common; at minimum, they are similar because they all belong to the group. If a
collection of people are interested in the same things, share the same opinions and
beliefs, or work together on the same task, then it seems they should be considered
—by both themselves and others—to be a social group. However, if there are a lot of
differences among the individuals, particularly in their goals, values, beliefs, and
behaviours, then they are less likely to be seen as a social group.
For instance, a social group’s size also determines how many social ties (relationships)
exist within it. In dyad for instance (i.e., best friends, lovers, etc.), members are linked by
strong emotional bonds that make their dynamics so intense that they belong in a
category on their own with just ONE social ties. In larger groups, members may rarely
connect directly to all other members, subgroups are very likely to form, and one or
more leaders may be needed to organise and guide the group.
Formula for calculating the social ties in a group is n(n – 1)/2 .
The relations that connect members also vary in type, strength, and duration; some are
more psychological than interpersonal. For example, in families, the relationships are
based on kinship, but in the workplace, they are based on task-related
interdependencies. In family groups, members are linked by strong psychological bond,
but in the workplace, the members are linked by common interests or experiences.
SOCIAL IDENTITY AND SOCIAL GROUP
Social identity is commonly defined as a person’s sense of self derived from perceived
membership in social groups. When we belong to a group, we are likely to derive our
sense of identity, at least in part, from that group.
Social identity theory was developed by Henri Tajfel and John Turner (1979) to
understand the psychological basis for intergroup discrimination. According to this
theory, social identity has three major components: categorisation, identification and
comparison.
The first component, categorisation, is the process of putting people, including
ourselves, into categories. Labelling someone as a Muslim, a female, or a soldier
are ways of defining these people.
The second component, identification, is the process by which we associate
ourselves with certain groups. Ingroups are groups we identify with, and
outgroups are ones that we don’t identify with.
The third component, comparison, is the process by which we compare our
groups with other groups, creating a favourable bias toward the group to which
we belong.
o One insight from social identity theory is that the groups to which people belong mean
something to them. Once a person sees herself as part of a group, she derives self-
esteem from that group membership.
CLASSIFICATION
Groups OF classified
can also be SOCIAL GROUPS?
as
FORMAL and INFORMAL
Basis of Comparison Informal Group Formal Group