PROJECT STAGE 1 REPORT ON

Comparative Study on Soil Stabilization

Techniques
Guided by,
Prof.S.P.Wakchaure

Present by
Prasad .P. Ahire
Prathmesh .S. Shejwal
Sonalika .D. Mohite
Suraj .R. Kagade
Comparative Study on Soil
Stabilization Techniques

In this presentation, we will explore the

importance of soil stabilization and
conduct a comparative study of various
techniques. Discover the benefits,
limitations, and real-world applications
of these methods.
Content

•Introduction to Soil Stabilization

•Objectives
•Literature Review
•Methodology
•Comparative Analysis of Techniques
•Benefits and Limitation
 What is Soil Stabilization?

Soil stabilization involves the modification of natural soil

properties to enhance its mechanical strength, durability, and
resistance to environmental factors. Explore different
techniques and their effectiveness in stabilizing soil for
construction purposes.
Objectives
1) To Study different soil stabilization techniques

2) To compare the performance of these techniques in terms

of strength , permeability, and other relevant parameters

3) To identify the most suitable stabilization technique for

specific application
 Sr. No. Author Year Title Key Findings

1 Amanpreet Tangri, 2018 “Effect of Blast Furnace From the experimental results it has been found that by using
Gagandeep Slag on Various Properties blast furnace slag with admixtures like lime increases the
of Clayey Soil: A Review”, value of U.C.S and C.B.R. and the variation is also found in
the compaction characteristics of soil. After doing a review
of various research papers we can conclude the by using the
blast furnace slag we can reduce the environmental pollution
and it could be used for the stabilization of clayey soil.

2 J Bala Krishna 2017 “Soil Stabilization with This research work presents the efficacy of sodium based
Flyash”, alkaline activators and class F fly ash as an additive in
improving the engineering characteristics of expansive Black
cotton soils. Sodium hydroxide concentrations of 10, 12.5
and 15 molal along with 1 Molar solution of sodium silicate
were used as activators. The activator to ash ratios was kept
between 1 and 2.5 and ash percentages of 20, 30 and 40 %,
relatively to the total solids
 Sr. No. Author Year Title Key Findings

3 Rasool and Kapoor 2017 “"Improvement of From the experimental results, it has been found that using
Engineering Properties of Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS) as an additive in
Soil Using Ground varying percentages (0%, 6%, 12%, 18%, and 24%) improves
Granulated Blast Furnace the engineering properties of soil. The study focused on
Slag (GGBS)” Unconfined Compressive Strength (U.C.S) and California
Bearing Ratio (C.B.R) tests. Among the tested proportions, 18%
GGBS showed the maximum increment in C.B.R value. The
compaction characteristics of the soil also improved with the
addition of GGBS. Thus, using GGBS—an industrial byproduct
—as a stabilizing agent not only enhances soil strength but also
offers a sustainable and economical solution for managing
problematic clayey soils..

4 Dayalan 2016 “Effect of Fly Ash and studied the use of fly ash and Ground Granulated Blast Furnace
GGBS on the Stabilization of Slag (GGBS) to minimize waste disposal and reduce
Soil”, environmental pollution through soil stabilization. In the study,
varying percentages (5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%) of fly ash and
GGBS were added to soil to assess changes in physical and
strength properties such as specific gravity, Atterberg limits,
moisture content, and California Bearing Ratio (CBR). The
 Sr. No. Author Year Title Key Findings

5 Abdelzaher E. A. Mostafa 2016 “"Improvement of From the experimental results, it has been found that using
Engineering Properties of Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS) as an additive in
Soil Using Ground varying percentages (0%, 6%, 12%, 18%, and 24%) improves
Granulated Blast Furnace the engineering properties of soil. The study focused on
Slag (GGBS)” Unconfined Compressive Strength (U.C.S) and California
Bearing Ratio (C.B.R) tests. Among the tested proportions, 18%
GGBS showed the maximum increment in C.B.R value. The
compaction characteristics of the soil also improved with the
addition of GGBS. Thus, using GGBS—an industrial byproduct
—as a stabilizing agent not only enhances soil strength but also
offers a sustainable and economical solution for managing
problematic clayey soils..
Chemical Stabilization
•Involves the use of chemical additives
such as lime, cement, and fly ash to alter
soil properties.
•Lime stabilization is effective in clayey
soils, improving strength and reducing
compressibility.
•Cement stabilization provides long-term
strength and durability, suitable for a
wide range of soil types
Mechanical Stabilization •Utilizes mechanical means to reinforce the
soil, including compaction, grouting, and
vibro-compaction.
•Compaction increases soil density,
reducing permeability and improving load-
bearing capacity.
•Grouting involves injecting stabilizing
materials into the soil, enhancing cohesion
and strength.
 Biological Stabilization

•Focuses on using vegetation, such as

plant roots, to stabilize soil.
•The root systems of plants can bind
soil particles, preventing erosion and
improving stability.
•Particularly effective in
environmentally sensitive areas.
Comparative Analysis of Techniques
1 Chemical Stabilization
Examining the use of chemical additives to improve soil stability. Discuss
pros and cons, including potential environmental impacts.

2 Mechanical Stabilization
Exploring methods like compaction and soil replacement to achieve desired
soil properties. Discuss advantages and limitations...

3 Geosynthetic Stabilization
Investigating the use of geotextiles and geogrids to reinforce soil and
increase bearing capacity. Analyze benefits and challenges...
Benefits and Limitations
Advantages of Specific Disadvantages and Limitations
Techniques
Identifying the potential challenges
Highlighting the unique benefits and limitations associated with
offered by each soil stabilization different soil stabilization methods.
technique. From cost-effectiveness Understanding the trade-offs...
to long-term durability...

Environmental Impacts and Sustainability

Evaluating the environmental considerations of soil stabilization techniques.
How can we ensure sustainable and eco-friendly practices?
Case Studies and Examples

Real-World Applications Success Stories and Lessons Learned

Outcomes
Examining successful Extracting valuable insights
projects that utilized Exploring the outcomes and from past soil stabilization
different soil stabilization lessons learned from case projects. Understanding
techniques. From highway studies. How did soil challenges and best
construction to building stabilization contribute to practices for future
foundations... project success? endeavors.
 Factors Influencing Technique Selection
Geotechnical Site Conditions Cost Analysis
Properties of and Project and Economic
Soil Requirements Feasibility
Considering the soil Evaluating the financial
composition, strength, and Examining site-specific implications and long-term
other geotechnical factors conditions, such as slope cost-effectiveness of
when choosing the most stability, drainage different soil stabilization
suitable stabilization requirements, and load- approaches.
technique. bearing capacity, in
technique selection.
 Experimental Investigation

Test conducted
• Specific Gravity
• Sieve Analysis
• Atterberg’s Limits (Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit and Plasticity
Index
• The additives viz. Cement and Stone Dust have added to the
soil in ratios as 0%, 2%, 4%,6%
• 2%, 4% and 6% by weight.
 Properties of Undisturbed Soil
Sr.No. Property Value
1 Specific Gravity 2.727
2 Grain Size Analysis
Gravel and Sand Size Particles 8.22
Silt and ClaySizeparticles 91.78
3 Atterberg’sLimits
Liquid Limit 15
Plastic Limit 13.53
Plasticity Index 1.47
 Size Analysis results for different percentages of
Cement
S.No. Percentage of Gravel & Sand Silt & Clay
Cement SizeParticleContent(%) SizeParticleContent(%)

1 0 8.22 91.78
2 2 3.8 96.2
3 4 5.9 94.1
4 6 6.1 93.9
 Sieve Analysis of Soil Mixed with Stone Dust
S.No. Percentage of Lime Gravel &Sand Size Particle Silt &Clay Size Particle
Content(%) Content(%)

1 0 98.8 1.2
2 2 97.5 2.5
3 4 96.1 3.9
4 6 94.2 5.8
 •Increased Strength and Load-Bearing Capacity

ADVANTAGES •Improved Soil Cohesion

•Dust Control
•Reduced Permeability
•Frost Susceptibility Mitigation
•Time and Cost Savings
•Environmentally Friendly
•Versatility
•Long-Term Performance
•Erosion Control
 APPLICATION
1.Road Construction
2.Airport Runways and Taxiways
3.Railway Track Construction
4.Parking Lots and Driveways
5.Foundation Construction
6.Embankment and Slope Stabilization
7.Landfills and Waste Containment
8.Mining and Quarry Rehabilitation
9.Pipeline Trenches
10.Military Operations
Conclusion
1 Summary of Findings 2 Future Trends and
and Key Takeaways Advancements
Recapping the main findings from Discussing emerging trends and
the comparative study on soil technological advancements in
stabilization techniques and their soil stabilization. How will these
practical applications. innovations shape the future of
construction?

3 Closing Remarks, Questions, and Discussions

Encouraging audience engagement by inviting questions, facilitating
discussions, and providing additional resources for further exploration.
THANK YOU.........