IRT IA 2
IRT IA 2
Innovative Assignment - II
Faculty Details
MUTHUKAMESH WARAN .C (VH Dr.G.Mahalakshmi
11617)
Associate Professor
KAVI BHARATHI.S (VH 11608)
Dept of AI&DS
AJITH. G (VH 11585)
2.) Create a proposal for a web retrieval system that effectively handles
multilingual content. What techniques would you implement to ensure
accurate retrieval across languages and cultures?
Proposal for a Multilingual Web Retrieval System:
INTRODUCTION :
The rise of global communication and diverse content creation
has led to an increasing need for search engines and web retrieval systems to
support multiple languages and cultural contexts. The objective of this proposal
is to design and implement a multilingual web retrieval system that ensures
accurate and effective information retrieval across different languages and
cultures.
This system will cater to users who search for content in various
languages and require contextually and culturally relevant results, regardless of
the language used in the query or content.
2
Key Features of the Multilingual Retrieval System:
Multilingual Indexing and Inverted Index:
Develop a multilingual inverted index that supports content in multiple
languages. Each document is processed and indexed in its native language using tokenization,
normalization, and stopword removal specific to that language.
1. Document Collection:
Gather all documents in the digital library, which can be in various formats (text, PDFs, etc.).
2. Tokenization:
Process each document to break it into individual terms (tokens). This may involve removing
punctuation, converting text to lowercase, and applying stemming or lemmatization.
3. Indexing:
Create a dictionary where each unique term points to a list of document IDs that contain the
term. For example:
EX: Term → Document IDs
"apple" → [1, 3, 5]
"banana" → [2, 5]
4. Search Query Processing:
When a user submits a search query, tokenize the query, look up each term in the
inverted index, and retrieve the corresponding document IDs.
5. Ranking Results:
Implement ranking algorithms (e.g., TF-IDF, BM25) to order the results based on
relevance.
2. Query Expansion:
When a user enters a search query, expand the query by including synonyms
from the thesaurus. For example, if a user searches for “car”expanded query would include
"car," "automobile," and "vehicle."
3. Semantic Search:
Implement semantic search techniques using Natural Language Processing
(NLP) models that can understand context and identify related terms.
4. Faceted Search:
Allow users to filter search results based on categories, which can include
synonyms or related concepts.
5. Search Suggestions:
Provide users with suggestions as they type their queries,
including potential synonyms and related terms, enhancing their search
experience.
CONCLUSION:
In conclusion, implementing an inverted index in a digital library
significantly enhances search efficiency by providing a fast way to retrieve
documents containing specific terms.
By mapping terms to their respective document IDs and potentially
integrating ranking mechanisms like TF-IDF, the search experience becomes
both faster and more relevant.
THANK YOU