Scribd
Upload
2 views12 pages

Anova Two Way

The document discusses two-way ANOVA, including methods with and without replication, and provides an example involving sales performance of four salesmen across three seasons. It includes details on the ANOVA table structure, hypothesis testing, and calculations for sums of squares and mean squares. The results indicate acceptance of the null hypothesis, suggesting no significant differences in performance between salesmen or seasons.

Uploaded by

sajiniossajini0
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
2 views12 pages

Anova Two Way

The document discusses two-way ANOVA, including methods with and without replication, and provides an example involving sales performance of four salesmen across three seasons. It includes details on the ANOVA table structure, hypothesis testing, and calculations for sums of squares and mean squares. The results indicate acceptance of the null hypothesis, suggesting no significant differences in performance between salesmen or seasons.

Uploaded by

sajiniossajini0
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

ANOVA

Two way ANOVA


Without replication
With replication (interaction effect)
ANOVA TABLE
Source of SS v Mean Square F Ratio
Variation
Between SSC c-1 MSC=SSC/(c-1) MSC/MSE
Samples
Between rows SSR r-1 MSR=SSR/(r-1) MSR/MSE
Residual Error SSE (c-1)(r-1) MSE= SSE/(c-1)(r-1)
Total SST cr-1
ANOVA TABLE
Source of SS v Mean Square F Ratio
Variation
Between SSC c-1 MSC=SSC/(c-1) MSC/MSE
Samples
Between rows SSR r-1 MSR=SSR/(r-1) MSR/MSE
Interaction SSI MSI=SSI/df MSI/MSE
Residual Error SSE (c-1)(r-1) MSE= SSE/(c-1)(r-1)
Total SST cr-1
EXAMPLE

 A tea company appoints four salesmen A, B, C and D and


observes their sales in three seasons- Summer, Winter and
Monsoon. The figures are given in the following table:
Seasons Salesman Total
A B C D
Summer 36 36 21 35 128
Winter 28 29 31 32 120
Monsoon 26 28 29 29 112
Salesman 90 93 81 96 360
Total
Hypothesis
 There is no significant difference between salesman
in their performance
 There no significant difference between the seasons
SHORT CUT METHOD
A1 A12 B2 B22 C3 C32 D4 D42 TOTAL
36 129 36 129 21 441 35 122 128
6 6 5 120
28 784 29 841 31 961 32 102 112
4
26 676 28 784 29 841 29 841
90 275 93 292 81 224 96 309
6 1 3 0
The sum of all items of the sample
++ =
The total sum of squares 360

++- T2/N = 11010-


10800
= 210
Sum of square between Salesman (n=3)

=10842- 10800
=42
Sum of square between Seasons (n=4)

=10832- 10800
=32
ANOVA TABLE
Source of SS v Mean Square F Ratio
Variation
Between 42 c-1= 3 MSC=SSC/(c-1)= 14 MSC/MSE

Salesman
1.619
Between Season 32 r-1= 2 MSR=SSR/(r-1)= 16 MSR/MSE
1.417
Residual Error 136 (c-1)(r-1)= 6 MSE= SSE/(c-1)(r-1)= 22.67
Total 210 cr-1= 11
Accept the null hypothesis
ANOVA TABLE
Source of SS v Mean F Ratio
Variation Square
Between 50 3 16.7
Sample
Within 208 16 13
Samples
Total 258 19
The difference in the mean values of the sample is
F0.05, 3, 16 = not significant. The samples could have come from

You might also like