0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views

cpu-scheduling

The document provides an overview of CPU scheduling, detailing its basic concepts, components, and various scheduling algorithms such as FCFS, SJF, and Round Robin. It discusses the importance of scheduling criteria, including CPU utilization, turnaround time, and fairness, in evaluating the efficiency of scheduling systems. Additionally, it covers performance metrics and the application of scheduling in multiprocessor systems.

Uploaded by

Jhonemar Tejano
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views

cpu-scheduling

The document provides an overview of CPU scheduling, detailing its basic concepts, components, and various scheduling algorithms such as FCFS, SJF, and Round Robin. It discusses the importance of scheduling criteria, including CPU utilization, turnaround time, and fairness, in evaluating the efficiency of scheduling systems. Additionally, it covers performance metrics and the application of scheduling in multiprocessor systems.

Uploaded by

Jhonemar Tejano
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 37

CPU

SCHEDULING
P O R T
RE

BY: E L F I E L A M P I N A Q U E
D E X T E R J A M E S D E G AYO
TABLE OF CONTENT
1 BASIC CONCEPTS

2 SCHEDULING CRITERIA
SCHEDULING ALGORITHMS (FCFS,
3
SJF, PRIORITY, ROUND ROBIN,
E TC . )
M U LT I L E V E L Q U E U E
4
SCHEDULING
BASIC CONCEPTS

C P U S C H E D U L I N G I S A F U N D A M E N TA L C O N C E P T
I N O P E R AT I N G S Y S T E M S T H AT D E T E R M I N E S
WHICH PROCESS GETS TO USE THE CPU WHEN
M U LT I P L E P R O C E S S E S A R E R E A DY T O E X E C U T E .
T H E S T R U C T U R E O F C P U S C H E D U L I N G I N C LU D E S
VA R I O U S C O M P O N E N T S A N D S C H E D U L I N G
ALGORITHMS.
CPU SCHEDULING
COMPONENTS
1 . P R O C E S S S TAT E S :

> N e w → R e a d y → R u n n i n g → Wa i t i n g → Te r m i n a t e d
> T h e C P U s c h e d u l e r s e l e c t s p ro c e s s e s f ro m t h e Re a d y
Queue for execution.

2.Process Control Block (PCB):

> S to re s p ro c e s s a ttri b u te s l i ke Pro c e s s I D ( PID ) , C PU


registers, priority, program counter, etc.
CPU SCHEDULING
COMPONENTS
3.QUEUES USED IN SCHEDULING:

>Job Queue: Contains all processes in the system.


> Re a d y Q u e u e : C o n t a i n s p ro c e s s e s re a d y t o exe c u t e .
> Wa i t i n g Q u e u e : C o n t a i n s p r o c e s s e s w a i t i n g f o r I / O o p e r a t i o n s .

4.CPU Scheduler

> S e l e c t s a p ro c e s s f ro m t h e Re a d y Q u e u e a n d a s s i g n s i t t o t h e C P U .

5.Dispatcher:

Loads the selected process from the ready queue into the CPU for
execution.
TYPES OF CPU SCHEDULING
ALGORITHMS
CPU SCHEDULING CAN BE DIVIDED INTO PREEMPTIVE AND NON-
PREEMPTIVE APPROACHES.

A. Non-Preemptive Scheduling Algorithms


1 . Fi r s t C o m e Fi r s t S e r v e ( F C F S ) :

>Processes are scheduled in the order they arrive.


> S i m p l e b u t c a n c a u s e c o n v o y e ff e c t ( s l o w p r o c e s s d e l a y s f a s t e r
ones).

2 . S h o r t e s t J o b N e x t ( S J N ) / S h o r t e s t J o b Fi r s t ( S J F ) :

> P r o c e s s w i t h t h e s m a l l e s t b u r s t t i m e i s s e l e c t e d fi r s t .
> O p t i m a l i n m i n i m i z i n g w a i t i n g t i m e b u t s u ff e r s f r o m s t a r v a t i o n
TYPES OF CPU SCHEDULING
ALGORITHMS
3.PRIORITY SCHEDULING:

P r o c e s s w i t h t h e h i g h e s t p r i o r i t y i s s c h e d u l e d fi r s t .
Starvation can occur if low-priority processes never get CPU
time.

B. PREEMPTIVE SCHEDULING ALGORITHMS


1.R O U N D R O B I N ( R R ) :
• EACH PROCESS GETS A FIXED TIME QUANTUM BEFORE
S W I TC H I N G T O T H E N E X T.
• R E D U C E S S TA RVAT I O N B U T I N C R E A S E S C O N T E X T S W I TC H I N G
OVERHEAD.
TYPES OF CPU SCHEDULING
ALGORITHMS
3.PRIORITY SCHEDULING (PREEMPTIVE):
• The CPU is assigned to the highest-priority
p r o c e s s , p r e e m p t i n g l o w e r- p r i o r i t y o n e s .
3.Multilevel Queue Scheduling:
• Divides processes into multiple queues based on
priority (e.g., system, interactive, batch).
4 . M u l t i l e v e l Fe e d b a c k Q u e u e :
• Processes move between queues based on their
behavior (e.g., interactive processes get higher
priority).
PERFORMANCE METRICS
T O E VA LU AT E C P U S C H E D U L I N G A L G O R I T H M S , W E
USE:
• Tu r n a r o u n d T i m e ( TAT ) = C o m p l e t i o n T i m e -
Arrival Time
• Wa i t i n g T i m e ( W T ) = Tu r n a r o u n d T i m e - B u r s t
Time
• Re s p o n s e T i m e ( RT ) = Fi r s t R e s p o n s e T i m e -
Arrival Time
• Throughput = Number of processes executed
per unit time
CPU SCHEDULING IN
MULTIPROCESSOR SYSTEMS

• S Y M M E T R I C M U LT I P R O C E S S I N G ( S M P ) : E A C H
PR O C E S S O R H A S I TS O W N S C H E DU LE R.
• Asymmetric Multiprocessing (AMP): One
processor handles scheduling for all others.
2. SCHEDULING
CRITERIA
SCHEDULING
CRITERIA
THE SCHEDULING CRITERIA STRUCTURE
R E F E R S T O T H E FA C T O R S U S E D T O E VA LU AT E
AND PRIORITIZE PROCESSES IN A
SCHEDULING ALGORITHM. THESE CRITERIA
DETERMINE THE EFFICIENCY AND
EFFECTIVENESS OF A SCHEDULING SYSTEM,
E S P E C I A L LY I N O P E R AT I N G S Y S T E M S A N D
COMMON SCHEDULING CRITERIA:

>CPU UTILIZATION – THE PERCENTAGE OF


TIME THE CPU IS ACTIVELY EXECUTING
PROCESSES. A GOOD SCHEDULER MAXIMIZES
CPU USAGE.

>THROUGHPUT – THE NUMBER OF


PROCESSES COMPLETED PER UNIT OF TIME.
HIGHER THROUGHPUT MEANS BETTER
PERFORMANCE.
COMMON SCHEDULING CRITERIA:

TURNAROUND TIME – THE TOTAL TIME TAKEN


FROM PROCESS SUBMISSION TO COMPLETION,
INCLUDING EXECUTION AND WAITING TIME.
THE GOAL IS TO MINIMIZE TURNAROUND
TIME.

WAITING TIME – THE TOTAL TIME A PROCESS


SPENDS WAITING IN THE READY QUEUE
BEFORE EXECUTION. LOWER WAITING TIME
RESPONSE TIME – THE TIME
BETWEEN SUBMITTING A
REQUEST AND THE FIRST
RESPONSE (NOT COMPLETION).
CRITICAL FOR INTERACTIVE
SYSTEMS.

FAIRNESS – ENSURING ALL


DEADLINE ADHERENCE –
I M P O RTA N T F O R R E A L -T I M E
S Y S T E M S W H E R E TA S K S M U S T M E E T
STRICT DEADLINES.

PRIORITY HANDLING – IF A
P R I O R I T Y- B A S E D S C H E D U L I N G
ALGORITHM IS USED, IT ENSURES
SCHEDULING
ALGORITHMS
(FCFS, SJF, PRIORITY,
ROUND ROBIN
1 . F I R S T C O M E F I R S T S E RV E ( F C F S )

D E S C R I P T I O N : T H E P R O C E S S T H AT
A R R I V E S F I R S T I S E X E C U T E D F I R S T.
TYPE: NON-PREEMPTIVE
A D VA N TA G E S : S I M P L E A N D E A S Y T O
I M P L E M E N T.
D I S A D VA N TA G E S : C A U S E S C O N V OY
E F F E C T ( L O N G P R O C E S S E S D E L AY
3. PRIORITY SCHEDULING
DESCRIPTION: PROCESSES ARE
E X E C U T E D B A S E D O N P R I O R I T Y ( LO W E R
VA LU E = H I G H E R P R I O R I T Y ) .
TYPE: CAN BE PREEMPTIVE OR NON-
PREEMPTIVE.
A D VA N TA G E S : I M P O RTA N T TA S K S G E T
E X E C U T E D F I R S T.
D I S A D VA N TA G E S : M AY C A U S E
2 . S H O RT E S T J O B F I R S T ( S J F )
DESCRIPTION: THE PROCESS WITH
T H E S H O RT E S T B U R S T T I M E I S
E X E C U T E D F I R S T.
T Y P E : C A N B E P R E E M P T I V E ( S H O RT E S T
R E M A I N I N G T I M E F I R S T - S RT F ) O R
NON-PREEMPTIVE.
A D VA N TA G E S : M I N I M I Z E S AV E R A G E
WA I T I N G T I M E .
SCHEDULING ALGORITHMS
(FCFS, SJF, PRIORITY, ROUND
ROBIN
S C H E D U L I N G A L G O R I T H M S A R E U S E D BY
O P E R AT I N G S Y S T E M S T O D E T E R M I N E T H E
ORDER IN WHICH PROCESSES EXECUTE IN
A CPU. THE GOAL IS TO OPTIMIZE CPU
U T I L I Z AT I O N , R E S P O N S E T I M E , A N D
T H R O U G H P U T W H I L E M I N I M I Z I N G WA I T I N G
1 . F I R S T- C O M E , F I R S T- S E RV E D ( F C F S )
SCHEDULING
✅ TYPE: NON-PREEMPTIVE
✅ SELECTION CRITERIA: PROCESSES ARE
EXECUTED IN THE ORDER THEY ARRIVE.
✅ STRUCTURE:
M A I N TA I N A Q U E U E ( F I F O – F I R S T I N ,
FIRST OUT).
THE FIRST PROCESS IN THE QUEUE GETS
✅ A D VA N TA G E S :
✔ SIMPLE TO IMPLEMENT
✔ N O S TA RVAT I O N
✅ D I S A D VA N TA G E S :
✖ H I G H WA I T I N G T I M E I F A L O N G
P R O C E S S C O M E S F I R S T ( C O N V OY
EFFECT)
✖ N O T S U I TA B L E F O R T I M E -
2 . S H O RT E S T J O B F I R S T ( S J F ) S C H E D U L I N G
✅ T Y P E : C A N B E P R E E M P T I V E ( S H O RT E S T
R E M A I N I N G T I M E F I R S T - S RT F ) O R N O N -
PREEMPTIVE
✅ SELECTION CRITERIA: THE PROCESS WITH THE
S H O RT E S T B U R S T T I M E E X E C U T E S F I R S T.
✅ STRUCTURE:
S O RT A L L P R O C E S S E S B A S E D O N B U R S T T I M E .
T H E P R O C E S S W I T H T H E LO W E S T B U R S T T I M E
G E T S C P U F I R S T.
I N P R E E M P T I V E S J F ( S RT F ) , I F A N E W P R O C E S S
✅ A D VA N TA G E S :
✔ M I N I M I Z E S WA I T I N G T I M E A N D
TURNAROUND TIME
✔ E F F I C I E N T F O R B ATC H P R O C E S S I N G
✅ D I S A D VA N TA G E S :
✖ REQUIRES KNOWING BURST TIME
I N A D VA N C E
✖ C A N L E A D T O S TA RVAT I O N O F
3. PRIORITY SCHEDULING
✅ TYPE: CAN BE PREEMPTIVE OR NON-
PREEMPTIVE
✅ SELECTION CRITERIA: EACH PROCESS HAS A
P R I O R I T Y N U M B E R ; T H E LO W E R T H E N U M B E R ,
T H E H I G H E R T H E P R I O R I T Y.
✅ STRUCTURE:
S O RT P R O C E S S E S B A S E D O N P R I O R I T Y.
T H E H I G H E S T- P R I O R I T Y P R O C E S S E X E C U T E S
F I R S T.
IN PREEMPTIVE PRIORITY SCHEDULING, A NEW
✅ A D VA N TA G E S :
✔ U S E F U L F O R R E A L -T I M E S Y S T E M S
✔ E N S U R E S U R G E N T TA S K S G E T C P U
FIRST
✅ D I S A D VA N TA G E S :
✖ L O W - P R I O R I T Y P R O C E S S E S M AY
S TA RV E ( S TA RVAT I O N P R O B L E M )
✖ REQUIRES A MECHANISM (AGING) TO
P R E V E N T S TA RVAT I O N
4. ROUND ROBIN (RR) SCHEDULING
✅ TYPE: PREEMPTIVE
✅ SELECTION CRITERIA: EACH PROCESS GETS
A FIXED TIME SLICE (QUANTUM).
✅ STRUCTURE:
EACH PROCESS IS GIVEN A TIME SLICE (E.G.,
4MS).
AFTER ITS TIME SLICE, THE PROCESS IS
MOVED TO THE BACK OF THE QUEUE IF IT
HASN’T FINISHED.
✅ A D VA N TA G E S :
✔ FA I R F O R A L L P R O C E S S E S
✔ GOOD FOR TIME-SHARING
SYSTEMS
✅ D I S A D VA N TA G E S :
✖ C O N T E X T S W I TC H I N G O V E R H E A D
✖ HIGHER TURNAROUND TIME FOR
LO N G P R O C E S S E S I F T H E Q U A N T U M
MULTILEVEL QUEUE
SCHEDULING
W H AT I S M U LT I L E V E L Q U E U E S C H E D U L I N G

M U LT I L E V E L Q U E U E ( M L Q ) S C H E D U L I N G I S A
C P U S C H E D U L I N G A L G O R I T H M T H AT D I V I D E S
P R O C E S S E S I N T O M U LT I P L E Q U E U E S B A S E D
O N T H E I R C H A RAC T E R I S T I C S ( E . G . ,
P R I O R I T Y , P R O C E S S T Y P E , O R M E M O RY
REQUIREMENTS). EACH QUEUE HAS ITS
OWN SCHEDULING ALGORITHM, AND
S T R U C T U R E O F M U LT I L E V E L Q U E U E S C H E D U L I N G
✅ K E Y F E AT U R E S :
D I V I D E S T H E R E A DY Q U E U E I N T O M U LT I P L E
QUEUES.
EACH QUEUE HAS ITS OWN SCHEDULING
ALGORITHM (E.G., FCFS, SJF, RR).
A SCHEDULING POLICY DETERMINES HOW CPU
T I M E I S A L L O C AT E D B E T W E E N Q U E U E S .
✅ TYPES OF SCHEDULING BETWEEN QUEUES:
F I X E D P R I O R I T Y S C H E D U L I N G : H I G H E R- P R I O R I T Y
Q U E U E S A LWAY S E X E C U T E F I R S T.
TYPICAL QUEUES IN MLQ
SCHEDULING
A D VA N TA G E S & D I S A D VA N TA G E S
✅ A D VA N TA G E S :
✔ P R I O R I T I Z E S C R I T I C A L TA S K S ( S Y S T E M A N D
I N T E RAC T I V E P R O C E S S E S ) .
✔ E F F I C I E N T U S E O F C P U BY A L L O C AT I N G D I F F E R E N T
SCHEDULING ALGORITHMS.
✔ G O O D F O R S Y S T E M S W I T H D I V E R S E W O R K LOA D
TYPES.
❌ D I S A D VA N TA G E S :
✖ S TA RVAT I O N C A N O C C U R I F L O W E R - P R I O R I T Y
QUEUES GET LITTLE CPU TIME.
✖ PROCESSES ARE STUCK IN THEIR QUEUES (NO
MOVEMENT BETWEEN QUEUES).
W H E N T O U S E M U LT I L E V E L
QUEUE SCHEDULING?

• O P E R AT I N G S Y S T E M S : S E PA R AT I N G S Y S T E M
P R O C E S S E S , U S E R A P P L I C AT I O N S , A N D
B A C K G R O U N D TA S K S .
• C LO U D C O M P U T I NG : A S S I G N I N G P R I O R I T Y T O
D I F F E R E N T W O R K L O A D S ( R E A L -T I M E
P R O C E S S I N G V S . B ATC H J O B S ) .
THANK
YOU

You might also like