DILG Tagaytay Field Office

Amendment to the Provisions of DILG

Memorandum Circular 2023-022,
"Lupong Tagapamayapa Incentives
Awards Enhanced Criteria and Guidelines”
DILG Memorandum Circular 2024-174

JEROME M. LINGAN
CLGOO
 01
Introduction

DILG Tagaytay Field Office

DILG Tagaytay Field Office

INTRODUCTION
Katarungang Pambarangay – SYSTEM of
AMICABLY SETTLING DISPUTES

Lupong Tagapamayapa - empowered under

the Katarungang Pambarangay Law to mediate,
conciliate, and/or arbitrate disputes in the
barangay level to promote speedy
administration of justice.
 DILG Tagaytay Field Office

Lupong Awards (INTRODUCTION

- Recognizes outstanding Lupong

Tagapamayapa that adequately demonstrate the
ability to judiciously and expeditiously resolve cases
referred to them and demonstrates exemplary
performance and commendable contributions in
the promotion of KP.

- Annual search
 DILG Tagaytay Field Office

OBJECTIVES
• Strengthen the KP as an indigenous conflict resolution
structure at the grassroots level;

• Institutionalize a system of granting economic

benefits and other incentives to Lupons, which
demonstrate exemplary performance; and

• Generate greater awareness among, and support

from, the various sectors of the Philippine society on
the KP as a potent vehicle toward social order and
human development.
 DILG Tagaytay Field Office

COVERAGE

All barangays with organized Lupong

Tagapamayapa nationwide.
02
Assessment
Criteria
 DILG Tagaytay Field Office

Criteria and Point Distribution

CRITERIA I. EFFICIENCY IN OPERATIONS 42
CRITERIA II. EFFECTIVENESS IN SECURING THE 20
SETTLEMENT OF INTERPERSONAL DISPUTE OBJECTIVE
OF THE KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY

CRITERIA III. CREATIVITY AND RESOURCEFULNESS OF 30

THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
CRITERIA IV. AREA OR FACILITY FOR KP ACTIVITIES 5
CRITERIA V. FINANCIAL OR NON-FINANCIAL SUPPORT 3

TOTAL 100
 CRITERIA I.
EFFICIENCY IN
OPERATIONS
 POINT MEANS OF
CRITERIA HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
SCORE VERIFICATION
I. EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION 42
A. Observance of Settlement
20
Procedure and Settlement
Deadlines
1) Proper Recording of Every 5 5 points – Logbook/Record presented with all the required details for 1. Photo of the KP Record
Disputes all the filed KP Cases Book
2. Actual-Logbook of
4 points - Logbook/Record for filed KP Cases presented but either Cases/ Record of Cases
(a) Missing 1 critical information per LTIA Technical Notes for the whole year of
(b) Has any missing filed KP Case from the logbook/record book 2024

3 points - Logbook/Record for filed KP Cases presented but either

(a) Missing 2-3 critical information per LTIA Technical Notes
(b) 20-49% filed KP Case from the logbook/record book

2 points - Logbook/Record for filed KP Cases presented but either

(a) Missing 4-6 critical information per LTIA Technical Notes
(b) 50-99% filed KP Case from the logbook/record book

1 points - Logbook/Record for filed KP Cases presented but no KP

cases recorded

0 point – No MOVs presented for this criteria

DILG Tagaytay Field Office

 POINT MEANS OF
CRITERIA HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
SCORE VERIFICATION
I. EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION 43

A. Observance of Settlement
20 At least 10 samples of the
Procedure and Settlement
following
Deadlines
2) Sending of Notices and 5 5 points – KP Forms 8 and 9 were presented for all filed cases and 1. KP Form No. 7
Summons supplied with all the required information (may be name of receiving (Sumbong)
party/signature of receiving arty/date/time) 2. KP Form No. 8 (Notice
of Hearing) and
4 points - KP Forms 8 and 9 were presented but missing one (1) 3. KP Form No. 9
required information (may be name of receiving party/signature of (Summons for the
receiving arty/date/time) Respondent)
4. Official Receipt (Ulat ng
3 points - KP Forms 8 and 9 were presented but missing two or Opisyal)
more required information (may be name of receiving party/signature
of receiving arty/date/time)

2 points - KP Forms 8 and 9 were presented for less than 100% of

all filed cases but missing two or more required information (may be
name of receiving party/signature of receiving arty/date/time)

1 points – Only one of the KP form (8 or 9) was presented for all

filed cases

0 point – No MOVs presented for this criteria

DILG Tagaytay Field Office

 POINT MEANS OF
CRITERIA HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
SCORE VERIFICATION
I. EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION 42

A. Observance of Settlement
20
Procedure and Settlement
Deadlines
3) Resolution of KP Cases using 10 10 points– 90-100% of all file KP cases resolved using any mode of At least 10 samples of
ADR Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) within the prescribed period
and is supported by KP Form 16 and minutes of the proceedings with 1. KP Cases Summary of
all required and accurate information and properly filled out and Cases
signed 2. KP Form 16 (Amicable
Settlement Form)
9 points– 90-100% of all file KP cases resolved using any mode of 3. Minutes of the
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) within the prescribed period Proceedings/Hearings
4. Four (4) photos with
8 points– 60-89% of all file KP cases resolved using any mode of caption of ongoing KP
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) within the prescribed period Procedure
and is supported by KP Form 16 and minutes of the proceedings with
all required and accurate information and properly filled out and
signed

7 points– 60-89% of all file KP cases resolved using any mode of

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) within the prescribed period

DILG Tagaytay Field Office

 POINT MEANS OF
CRITERIA HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
SCORE VERIFICATION
I. EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION 42

A. Observance of Settlement
20
Procedure and Settlement
Deadlines
3) Resolution of KP Cases using 10 6 points– 40-59% of all file KP cases resolved using any mode of At least 10 samples of
ADR Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) within the prescribed period
and is supported by KP Form 16 and minutes of the proceedings with 1. KP Cases Summary of
all required and accurate information and properly filled out and Cases
signed 2. KP Form 16 (Amicable
Settlement Form)
5 points– 40-59% of all file KP cases resolved using any mode of 3. Minutes of the
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) within the prescribed period Proceedings/Hearings
4. Four (4) photos with
4 points– 20-39% of all file KP cases resolved using any mode of caption of ongoing KP
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) within the prescribed period Procedure
and is supported by KP Form 16 and minutes of the proceedings with
all required and accurate information and properly filled out and
signed

3 points– 20-39% of all file KP cases resolved using any mode of

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) within the prescribed period

DILG Tagaytay Field Office

 POINT MEANS OF
CRITERIA HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
SCORE VERIFICATION
I. EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION 42

A. Observance of Settlement
20
Procedure and Settlement
Deadlines
3) Resolution of KP Cases using 10 2 points– 19% or less of all file KP cases resolved using any mode At least 10 samples of
ADR of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) within the prescribed period
and is supported by KP Form 16 and minutes of the proceedings with 1. KP Cases Summary of
all required and accurate information and properly filled out and Cases
signed 2. KP Form 16 (Amicable
Settlement Form)
1 point– 19% or less of all file KP cases resolved using any mode of 3. Minutes of the
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) within the prescribed period Proceedings/Hearings
4. Four (4) photos with
0 point – No MOVs presented for the criteria caption of ongoing KP
Procedure

DILG Tagaytay Field Office

 POINT MEANS OF
CRITERIA HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
SCORE VERIFICATION
I. EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION 42

B. Systematic Maintenance of 6
Records
1) Proper Recording of Cases 2 2 points– Maintains a computer database that includes searchable Manual Records/Case
case information for all KP cases. The information in the database Record Book
must be complete, up-to-date and accurately reflect the case status
and relevant details 1. Photo with caption of
Case Record Book for
1 point– Presented any means of digitally recording of filed KP the current Assessment
cases, however does not show an actual database and/or a Year
searchable engine 2. Photo with caption of
print screen of Digital
0 point – No MOVs presented for the criteria Record Filing containing
scanned copies of KP
Files

DILG Tagaytay Field Office

 POINT MEANS OF
CRITERIA HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
SCORE VERIFICATION
I. EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION 42

B. Systematic Maintenance of 6
Records
2) Lupon Meeting 2 2 points– 12/12 Minutes of Lupon Meetings supported with with 1. Two photos with caption
Documentation minutes. Attendance Sheets and Notices of Meetings of compiled Notices of
- Accurate and complete Meetings, Minutes of
1 point– Fewer than 12 minutes of Lupon Meetings are supported by Lupon Meetings with
copies of the minutes of all complete documentation Attendance Sheet
Lupon meetings are
maintained 0 point – No MOVs presented for the criteria 2. Actual Folder containing
- Minuted should be all Lupon Meeting
accompanied by attendance Documentation
sheets and notices of the
meetings

DILG Tagaytay Field Office

 POINT MEANS OF
CRITERIA HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
SCORE VERIFICATION
I. EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION 42

B. Systematic Maintenance of 6
Records
3) Documentation of Reports 1 1. Two photos with caption
Submitted to Court and DILG 1 point– 100% of submitted reports maintained and 100% of of Compelled Copies of
obtained copies of any court/DILG receipts or acknowledgements Reports submitted to
confirming the receipts of the reports provided Court and to the DILG
- All reports submitted to the
court must be accurately 0 point – No MOVs presented for the criteria 2. Folder containing all
documented and properly files Reports submitted to the
Court and to the DILG

DILG Tagaytay Field Office

 POINT MEANS OF
CRITERIA HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
SCORE VERIFICATION
I. EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION 42

B. Systematic Maintenance of 6
Records
4. Securing Records in 1 1. 2 Photo with caption of
Appropriate Filing Cabinets 1 point– Records stored in accordance with judicial standards for cabinets with secured
- Filing cabinets must be security and management- equipped with locks and keys to ensure lock and key
the security of the records, access are limited to authorized barangay 2. Office order signed by
locked and access should be personnel only who have access to the keys of the cabinet the Punong Barangay on
restricted to Authorized the barangay official
Barangay personnel only Records are also categorized labeled and stored in a logical order authorized to access the
(by case number) KP Cases Cabinet
-Records should be organized
systematicially ensure easy 0 point – No MOVs presented for the criteria
retrieval and proper
maintenance

DILG Tagaytay Field Office

 POINT MEANS OF
CRITERIA HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
SCORE VERIFICATION
I. EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION 42

C. Timely Submission to the 7

Court and to the DILG
1. Submitted Settlement 5 1. 12 Letter of Transmittal
Agreements to Court on Time 5 points – 100% of KP Form 16 (Amicable Settlement Form) to court with attached
as provided in the Revised KP received by the appropriate courts in the prescribed timeline with Stamp-received
2. KP Form 16 (Amicable
Law 4 points – 75 to 99.99% of KP Form 16 (Amicable Settlement Form) Settlement Form as
received by the appropriate courts in the prescribed timeline stated in the transmittal
letter or
3 points – 41-74.99% of KP Form 16 (Amicable Settlement Form) 3. KP Form 14 Agreement
received by the appropriate courts in the prescribed timeline for Arbitration Form as
stated in the transmittal
2 points – 21-40.99% of KP Form 16 (Amicable Settlement Form) letter
received by the appropriate courts in the prescribed timeline

1 point – 1- 20.99% of KP Form 16 (Amicable Settlement Form)

received by the appropriate courts in the prescribed timeline
0 point – No MOVs presented for the criteria

DILG Tagaytay Field Office

 POINT MEANS OF
CRITERIA HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
SCORE VERIFICATION
I. EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION 42

C. Timely Submission to the 7

Court and to the DILG
2. Submitted Settlement 2 1. Letter of Transmittal and
Agreements to DILG 2 points – 4/4 (100%) Reports for the assessment period submitted attachments submitted
to the DILG to the DILG with
stamped received by the
-Submitted KP reports to the 1 point – 3/4 (76%) Reports for the assessment period submitted to appropriate DILG office
DILG within five (5) working the DILG
days of the beginning of 2. Copy of KP Quarterly
ensuing month Report Submitted
0 point – No MOVs presented for the criteria
-Ensure that reports are
stamoed with date and time of
receipt of the appropriate DILG
office

DILG Tagaytay Field Office

 POINT MEANS OF
CRITERIA HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
SCORE VERIFICATION
I. EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION 42
D. Conduct of Monthly
Meetings for the Administration 10
of KP

1. Notice of Meeting 2 2 points – Minimum of 12 meetings on KP-related matters must be 1. Notices of Lupon
help with complete details documented. Each Lupon Members must Meetings duly received
- Ensure that copies of the sign (indicating their name, date, and time of receipt) wehen by lupon members with
receiving the notices of meeting signature date and time
Notices of Meetings are orf receipt
provided to all Lupon 1 point – Anything beyond compliance document and/or with
Members with the date and incomplete details
time of receipt of each
Lupon Member
- Notices of Meeting shall 0 point – No MOVs presented for the criteria
indicate the date and time of
the meeting

DILG Tagaytay Field Office

 POINT MEANS OF
CRITERIA HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
SCORE VERIFICATION
I. EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION 42
D. Conduct of Monthly
Meetings for the Administration 10
of KP

2. Minutes of the Meeting 8 8 points – presented a total of twelve (12) Minutes of the Meeting, all 1. 12 Minutes of the Lupon
of which include matters related to KP and reflect all required Meeting
- Ensure that detailed minutes information
of the meetng are recorded, 7 points – Presented a total of twelve (12) Minutes of Meetings
that shall contain: however, has missing information
>Meeting date and Time
>Attendees (including any
absent lupons which should be 6 points – presented a total of eleven (11)Minutes of the Meeting, all
indicated) of which include matters related to KP and reflect all required
information
>Shall be signed by the
secretary and duly noted bu 5 points – Presented a total of eleven (11) Minutes of Meetings
the Lupon Chair however, has missing information

DILG Tagaytay Field Office

 POINT MEANS OF
CRITERIA HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
SCORE VERIFICATION
I. EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION 42
D. Conduct of Monthly
Meetings for the Administration 10
of KP

2. Minutes of the Meeting 8 4 points – presented a total of ten (10)Minutes of the Meeting, all of 1. 12 Minutes of the Lupon
which include matters related to KP and reflect all required Meeting
- Ensure that detailed minutes information
of the meetng are recorded, 3 points – Presented a total of ten (10) Minutes of Meetings
that shall contain: however, has missing information
>Meeting date and Time
>Attendees (including any 2 points – presented a total of less than ten (10) Minutes of the
absent lupons which should be Meeting, all of which include matters related to KP and reflect all
indicated) required information
>Shall be signed by the 1 point – Presented a total of less than ten (10) Minutes of Meetings
secretary and duly noted bu however, has missing information
the Lupon Chair
0 point – No MOVs presented for the criteria

DILG Tagaytay Field Office

 CRITERIA II. EFFECTIVENESS IN
SECURING THE SETTLEMENT OF
INTERPERSONAL DISPUTE
OBJECTIVE OF THE KATARUNGANG
PAMBARANGAY
 POINT HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG MEANS OF
CRITERIA
SCORE TAGAPAMAYAPA VERIFICATION
II. EFFECTIVENESS IN 20
SECURING THE
SETTLEMENT OF
INTERPERSONAL DISPUTE
OBJECTIVE OF THE
KATARUNGANG
PAMBARANGAY
A. Quantity of settled cases 10 : At least 10 samples of
against filed With a minimum of 10 cases filed and settled in the subject 1. Summary of Cases
assessment year
2. KP Form 7
-Details of each case shall be
provided in the Summary of 10 points = 100% (Sumbong)
cases 9 points – 85-99.99% 3. KP Form 8 Notice of
8 points = 70.01-84.99% Hearing
7 points = 60.01- 70.00% 4. KP Form 9
6 points = 50.01 – 60.00% (Summons for the
5 points = 40.01 to 50.00% respondent and Official
4 points = 31.01+40.00%
Receipt
3 points = 20.01-30.00%
2 points = 10.01 – 20.00 5. KP Form 16 Amicable
1 point – 1-10.00% Settlement
0 point = 0% 6. Minutes of the
Proceedings/Hearings
 POINT HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG MEANS OF
CRITERIA
SCORE TAGAPAMAYAPA VERIFICATION
II. EFFECTIVENESS IN 20
SECURING THE
SETTLEMENT OF
INTERPERSONAL DISPUTE
OBJECTIVE OF THE
KATARUNGANG
PAMBARANGAY
B. Quality of Settled Cases 10 : 1. Summary of Cases
2. Logbook of
1. There shall be zero (0) 1 1 point – No cases repudiated
Cases/Record Book
cases repudiated in all settled
cases 0 point – No MOV presented in this criteria
 POINT HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG MEANS OF
CRITERIA
SCORE TAGAPAMAYAPA VERIFICATION
II. EFFECTIVENESS IN 20
SECURING THE
SETTLEMENT OF
INTERPERSONAL DISPUTE
OBJECTIVE OF THE
KATARUNGANG
PAMBARANGAY
B. Quality of Settled Cases 10 : 1. Summary of Cases
2. Logbook of
1. There shall be zero (0) 1 1 point – No cases recurred
Cases/Record Book
cases recurring
0 point – No MOV presented in this criteria
 POINT HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG MEANS OF
CRITERIA
SCORE TAGAPAMAYAPA VERIFICATION
II. EFFECTIVENESS IN 20
SECURING THE
SETTLEMENT OF
INTERPERSONAL DISPUTE
OBJECTIVE OF THE
KATARUNGANG
PAMBARANGAY
B. Quality of Settled Cases 10 :
1. KP Form No. 16
1. Compliance to terms of 8 8 points – 100% Compliance to all terms of settlement/ (Amicable
settlement of award as award as shown in MOVs provided
Settlement Form) or
agreed by both parties after 7 points – 95-99,99% Compliance
the cases have been settled 6 points – 85-94.99% Compliance KP Form 14
5 points – 75- 84.99% Compliance (Agreement for
-At least 80% compliance with 4 points – 60-74.99% Compliance Arbitration Form)
the terms of settlement or 3 points –50-59.99% Compliance 2. Any other MOVs
award after the cases have 2 points –30-49.99Compliance that may provide
been settled 1 point – </= 20.99% Compliance proof of compliance
0 point – No MOV presented in this criteria
(ie
Acknowledgement
receipt/s/ ledger)
CRITERIA III. CREATIVITY AND
RESOURCEFULNESS OF THE
LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
 POINT
CRITERIA HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA MEANS OF VERIFICATION
SCORE
III. CREATIVITY AND 30
RESOURCEFULNESS OF THE
LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
A. Settlement Technique 10 10 points – Presentation of 5 settlement techniques that 1. List of Settlement Technique
utilized by the Lupon showcase creativity in settling cases and are within the utilized should be within the KP
jurisdiction of the KP Process process and procedures.
1. Utilization of different Settlement 9 points – Presentation of 5 settlement techniques
techniques in the resolution of cases 8 points – Presentation of 4 settlement techniques that 2. Two (2) photos with caption of
filed showcase creativity in settling cases and are within the each Settlement Techniques
jurisdiction of the KP Process utilized by the Lupon within the
7 points – Presentation of 4 settlement techniques assessment period
6 points – Presentation of 3 settlement techniques that
showcase creativity in settling cases and are within the
jurisdiction of the KP Process
5 points – Presentation of 3 settlement techniques
4 points – Presentation of 2 settlement techniques that
showcase creativity in settling cases and are within the
jurisdiction of the KP Process
3 points – Presentation of 2 settlement techniques
2 points – Presentation of 1 settlement techniques that
showcase creativity in settling cases and are within the
jurisdiction of the KP Process
1 points – Presentation of 1 settlement techniques
0 points – Np MOVs presented for this criteria
 POINT
CRITERIA HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA MEANS OF VERIFICATION
SCORE
III. CREATIVITY AND 30
RESOURCEFULNESS OF THE
LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
B. Coordination with Concerned 5 5 points – conducted coordination meeting/s re: disputes 1. Certified True Copy of Certificates
Agencies relating to disputes filed with concerned agency of Appearance and photo
filed (PNP, DSWD, DILG, DENR, documentation
Office of the Prosecutor, DOJ, 0 points – Np MOVs presented for this criteria
CHR etc)

1. Coordination with Concerned

Agencies relating to disputes filed
(ie PNP, DSWD, DILG, DAR,
DENR, Office of the Prosecutor,
Court, DOJ, CHR, etc)
 POINT
CRITERIA HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA MEANS OF VERIFICATION
SCORE
III. CREATIVITY AND 30
RESOURCEFULNESS OF THE
LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
C. Sustained information drive to 2 2 points – presented up-to-date and relevant IEC 1. Scanned copies of IEC Material
promote Katarungang materials in formats thatc an easily be distributed to the developed by the Barangay
Pambarangay public and in the local vernacular

1. Development of relevant IEC 1 point – presented IEC Material relevant to KP

Materials
0 point - No MOVs presented for this criteria
Considerations on the materials
presented
-Quality and relevance of materials
created
- Clarity of information presented
 POINT
CRITERIA HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA MEANS OF VERIFICATION
SCORE
III. CREATIVITY AND 30
RESOURCEFULNESS OF THE
LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
C. Sustained information drive to 2 2 points – IEC Activity on KP conducted independently 1. Post Activity Report of IEC
promote Katarungang from other barangay activities Activity/ies conducted with photo
Pambarangay documentation to promote
1 point – IEC Actvity on KP conducted during a regular awareness om KP
2. Conduct of IEC Activities barangay activity

0 point - No MOVs presented for this criteria

 POINT
CRITERIA HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA MEANS OF VERIFICATION
SCORE
III. CREATIVITY AND 30
RESOURCEFULNESS OF THE
LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
C. Sustained information drive to 2 1. Post activity report and 2 photos
promote Katarungang 1 point – Implemented creative approaches that promote with caption of Strategy/ies listed
Pambarangay awareness and engagement on Katarungang /presented with applicable
Pambarangay documentation
3. Implementation of Innovative
Campaign Strategies 0 point - No MOVs presented for this criteria
 POINT
CRITERIA HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA MEANS OF VERIFICATION
SCORE
III. CREATIVITY AND 30
RESOURCEFULNESS OF THE
LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
C. KP Training or Seminar within 10 9-10 points – completing six (6) valid training with 1. Certificate/s of Appearance
the assessment period Certificates of Appearance

1. Organized skills training sessions 8 points - completing five (5) valid training with
attended/participated by the Lupong Certificates of Appearance
tagapamayapa
6 points - completing four (4) valid training with
Certificates of Appearance

4 points - completing three (3) valid training with

Certificates of Appearance

2 points - completing two (2) valid training with

Certificates of Appearance

0 points – No MOV presented for this criteria

CRITERIA IV. AREA OR FACILITY FOR
KP ACTIVITIES
 POINT
HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG MEANS OF
CRITERIA SCOR
TAGAPAMAYAPA VERIFICATION
E
IV. AREA OR FACILITY FOR 5
KP ACTIVITIES
● Building structure or For cities: • Three (3) photos with caption of
space 5 points – office or room for exclusive use the building or space used
during KP proceedings with tables, chairs and exclusively for KP and LT
For cities – the office or other furniture and necessary equipment concerns, furniture, fixtures and
space should be exclusive for equipment used in the operation
KP matters 2 points – office or room for shared use during of the KP Office.
KP proceedings with tables, chairs and other
For municipalities – KP office furniture and necessary equipment
or space may be shared or
used for other Barangay 0 point – No MOV presented
matters.
CRITERIA V. FINANCIAL OR NON-
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
 POINT
CRITERIA HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA MEANS OF VERIFICATION
SCORE
V. FINANCIAL OR NON- 3
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
1. From City, Municipal, 2 2 points - received support from the both National & 1. Certified true copies of any
Provincial or NGAs Local Government proof of support such as Deed
of Donation, MOA, Resolution,
Note 1 point - received support from either National & Local Appropriations Ordinance,
Government Acknowledgment Receipts,
Vouchers and etc.
0 point - no support

2. From People's 1 1 point – received support from either the organization or 1. Certified true copies of any
Organizations, NGOs or individual proof of support such as Deed
Private Sector of Donation, MOA,
0 point – no support received from either the organization Acknowledgment Receipts,
or individual Vouchers and etc.
What to prepare

1. All MOVs as Discussed

2. Duly Accomplished LTIA Form 7
Calendar of Activities
Date Activities
February 14, 2025 MOV Document Preparation and
Consolidation

February 5, 2025 Final Instructions on Document Packaging

and MOV Presentation

February 18 to 21, 2025 LTIA Table Assessment

-Punong Barangay
-Barangay Sec
-1 member of the Lupon
Marami
ng
Salamat
JEROME M. LINGAN
CLGOO
CREDITS: This presentation template was
created by Slidesgo, including icons by
DILG-Tagaytay
Flaticon, and infographics & images by
Freepik

Please keep this slide for attribution