0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views58 pages

Understanding-Employee-Attitudes I/O Psych

The document discusses employee satisfaction and commitment, highlighting the correlations between various employee attitudes and outcomes such as absenteeism and performance. It explores individual differences in satisfaction, types of organizational commitment, and the importance of person-organization fit. Additionally, it provides strategies for increasing job satisfaction and attendance, as well as measuring satisfaction and commitment through various tools.

Uploaded by

Raphah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views58 pages

Understanding-Employee-Attitudes I/O Psych

The document discusses employee satisfaction and commitment, highlighting the correlations between various employee attitudes and outcomes such as absenteeism and performance. It explores individual differences in satisfaction, types of organizational commitment, and the importance of person-organization fit. Additionally, it provides strategies for increasing job satisfaction and attendance, as well as measuring satisfaction and commitment through various tools.

Uploaded by

Raphah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 58

© 2013 Cengage Learning

Employee Satisfaction and


Commitment

1
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Why Worry About


Employee Attitudes?
Outcome Satisfaction Commitment
Absenteeism -.23 -.23
Turnover -.22 -.23
Lateness -.11 -.29
Organizational citizenship .24 .25
Counterproductive behavior -.37 -.36
Performance .30
Commitment .59
Note: Numbers in table are corrected correlations 2
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Individual Differences in
Employee Satisfaction
• Important Findings
– Consistency across jobs
– Consistency across time
– Relationship between life satisfaction
and job satisfaction
• Why?
– Genetic predispositions
– Core self-evaluations
• self-esteem
• self-efficacy
• internal locus of control
• optimism/positive affectivity 3
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Types of Organizational
Commitment
• Affective commitment
• Continuance commitment
• Normative commitment

4
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Core Self-Evaluation
Judge and Bono (2001) Meta-Analysis

Corrected Correlations With


Core-Evaluation Trait Satisfaction Performance
Self-esteem .26 .26
Self-efficacy .45 .23
Internal locus of control .32 .22
Emotional stability .24 .19

5
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Personality
Meta-Analysis Results

Corrected Correlations With


Personality Trait Satisfaction Performance Turnover
Openness .02 .06 .10
Conscientiousness .26 .24 -.22
Extraversion .25 .09 -.04
Agreeableness .17 .12 -.27

Stability .29 .15 -.20

6
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Your Predisposition to be Satisfied

• Interest Inventory
• Life Satisfaction Measure
• Core Self-Evaluation
– self-esteem
– locus of control
– affectivity
• Job Satisfaction History

7
© 2013 Cengage Learning

International Differences in Job Satisfaction


Sousa-Poza and Sousa-Poza (2000)
• 5.69 Denmark • 5.17 Germany
• 5.66 Cyprus • 5.17 Portugal
• 5.47 Switzerland • 5.13 Great Britain
• 5.45 Israel • 5.13 Czech Republic
• 5.43 Netherlands • 5.09 France
• 5.40 Spain • 5.05 Bulgaria
• 5.34 United States • 4.95 Slovenia
• 5.27 New Zealand • 4.87 Japan
• 5.24 Sweden • 4.86 Russia
• 5.22 Norway • 4.82 Hungary
• 5.18 Italy
8
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Dirty Jobs
9
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Discrepancy Theories
• Have the employee’s expectations been
met?
– Realistic job previews (RJPs)
• Is the employee a good fit?
– Vocation
– Job
– Organization
– Coworkers and supervisor
• Have the employee’s needs, values and
wants been met?
– Maslow’s Needs Hierarchy
– ERG Theory
– Two-factor Theory

10
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Person-Organization Fit
Kristof-Brown et al. (2005) Meta-Analysis

Employee fit with


Attitude or Behavior Organization Group Supervisor Job
Satisfaction .44 .31 .44 .56
Commitment .51 .19 .09 .47
Performance .07 .19 .18 .20
Turnover - .14 - .08
Turnover intent - .35 - .46
Absenteeism - .05

11
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Maslow’s Need Hierarchy

Self-Actualization
Needs
Ego Needs
Social Needs
Safety Needs
Basic Biological Needs

12
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Discrepancy Theories
ERG Theory

• Growth
• Relatedness
• Existence

13
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Discrepancy Theories
Two-Factor Theory
• Motivators
– responsibility
– challenge
– job control
• Hygiene factors
– pay
– benefits
– coworkers

14
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Job Facets
• Are the tasks enjoyable?
• Do the employees enjoy
working with their
supervisors and
coworkers?
• Are coworkers outwardly
unhappy

15
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Are Rewards And Resources


Given Equitably?
• Equity Theory
• Components
– inputs
– outputs
– input/output ratio
• Possible Situations
– underpayment
– overpayment
– equal payment
16
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Organizational Justice

• Distributive justice
• Procedural justice
• Interactional justice

17
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Correlations with Perceptions of Justice


Colquitt, Conlon, Wesson, Porter, and Ng (2001)
Outcome Procedural Distributive
Justice Justice
Job satisfaction .62 .56
Organizational commitment .57 .51
Trust .61 .51
Withdrawal - .46 - .50
Performance .36 .15
Negative employee reactions - .31 - .30
18
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Is There a Chance for Growth


and Challenge?
• Enriched jobs
– Variety of skills needed
– Employee completes entire task
– Tasks have meaning
– Employee has input/control
– employee receives feedback
• Methods
– Job rotation
– Job enlargement
– Job enrichment 19
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Increasing Job Satisfaction


• Hire “Satisfied” Employees
• Eliminate Dissatisfiers
• Express appreciation and provide proper feedback
• Increase opportunities to socialize
• Hold special events and friendly competitions
• Increase humor
• Have surprises
• Assign the right tasks to the right people

20
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Hire “Satisfied Employees”

• Test for Satisfaction Potential


– Interest inventory
– Core self-evaluation
– Satisfaction history
• Provide a realistic job preview
• Look for person-organization fit

21
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Eliminate Dissatisfiers
• Interpersonal conflict
– Peers
– Supervisors
– Customers
• Inequity
• Low pay
• Job security
• Poor working conditions
• Work schedule issues
22
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Hold Special Events and


Friendly Competitions
• Casual or spirit days
• Increase socialization
through parties, picnics,
and socials
• Hold fun contests
• Celebrate birthdays and
special occasions
• Encourage humor

23
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Express Appreciation and


Provide Proper Feedback
• Liberal use of praise and
thanks
• Positive feedback
• Service and performance
awards
• _________________
• _________________
• _________________
24
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Increase Opportunities to
Socialize
• Picnics
• Lunches
• _______________
• _______________
• _______________
• _______________
• _______________

25
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Hold Special Events and Friendly


Competitions
• Casual days
• Company logo day
• ________________
• ________________
• ________________
• ________________

26
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Increase Humor
• Bulletin boards with humor
• Attach cartoons to boring
memos
• ________________
• ________________
• ________________

27
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Have Surprises
• Order lunch for everyone
• Let everyone leave an
hour early
• __________________
• __________________
• __________________
• __________________

28
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Assign the Right Tasks to


the Right People
• People have different
interests
• People have different
skills

29
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Dream Jobs
30
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Measuring Job Satisfaction


• Faces Scale
• Job Descriptive Index (JDI)
• Minnesota Satisfaction
Questionnaire
• Job in General Scale
• Nagy Satisfaction Scale
• Custom designed inventories

31
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Measuring Commitment
• Allen and Myer Survey
• Organizational Commitment Questionnaire
• Organizational Commitment Scale

32
© 2013 Cengage Learning

33
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Year Cost of U. S. Absenteeism Rate


Absenteeism CCH Survey BNA Survey

2007 2.30
2006 2.50
2005 $660 2.30
2004 $610 2.40 1.40
2003 $645 1.90 1.60
2002 $789 2.10 1.60
2001 $755 2.20 1.70
2000 $610 2.10 1.70
1998 $757 3.25 1.60
1996 $603 2.80 1.60 34
© 2013 Cengage Learning

International Differences – Nutreco (2000)


Country Absenteeism Rate (%)
Canada 1.6
Ireland 1.9
Poland 2.3
Chile 2.7
United Kingdom 3.2
Spain 3.8
France 4.0
Belgium 6.3
Norway 7.2
Netherlands 7.8 35
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Reason for Missing Work (CCH Survey)


Year Illness Stress Personal Family Sense of
Needs Issues Entitlement
2007 34 13 18 22 13
2006 35 12 18 24 11
2005 35 12 18 21 14
2004 38 11 18 23 10
2003 36 11 18 22 13
2002 33 12 21 24 10
2000 40 5 20 21 14
1998 20 16 24 21 19
1996 28 11 20 26 15
36
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Actual Employee Excuses for Missing Work


• I was sprayed by a skunk.
• I tripped over my dog and was knocked unconscious.
• My bus broke down and was held up by robbers.
• I was arrested as a result of mistaken identity.
• I forgot to come back to work after lunch.
• I couldn’t find my shoes.
• I hurt myself bowling.
• I was spit on by a venomous snake.
• I totaled my wife’s jeep in a collision with a cow.
• A hitman was looking for me.
• My curlers burned my hair and I had to go to the hairdresser
• I eloped.
• My cat unplugged my alarm clock.
• I had to be there for my husband’s grand jury trial.
• I had to ship my grandmother’s bones to India. (note: she had passed away 20
years ago)

37
Source: 2004 CareerBuilder.Com Survey
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Why Employees Are Absent


• No consequences for
attending or missing work
• Illness and personal
problems
• Individual differences
• Unique events

38
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Increasing Attendance by Having


Consequences for Missing Work
• Rewards for Attending
– Financial incentives
• Well pay
• Games
• Financial bonuses
– Paid Time-off Programs
– Recognition programs
• Discipline for Not Attending
• Clear Policy and Record Keeping

39
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Increasing Attendance by
Reducing Employee Stress
• Overload
• Conflict
– peers
– supervisors
• Boredom
• Safety Issues

40
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Increasing Attendance by
Reducing Illness

41
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Types of Wellness Programs


SHRM 2011 Survey
Wellness Program % Offering
Employee assistance program 75
Provide wellness information 75
Health screening programs 42
Smoking cessation program 36
Weight loss program 30
On-site fitness center 24
Stress reduction programs 12

42
© 2013 Cengage Learning

CCH Absence Control Surveys


Absence Control Percent Using Effectiveness Rating
Method 2003 2005 2007 2003 2005 2007

Disciplinary action 96 90 89 3.3 3.4 3.4

Performance appraisal 84 79 82 2.9 3.0 2.9

Verification of illness 75 76 74 2.9 3.2 3.2

Paid leave bank 59 67 60 3.6 3.5 3.6

Personal recognition 62 66 57 2.5 2.6 2.6

No-fault systems 62 63 59 3.0 3.0 2.9

Bonus programs 52 57 51 3.1 3.3 3.3

Buy-back programs 548 58 53 3.3 3.5 3.443


© 2013 Cengage Learning

44
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Why Do Employees Leave?


• Unavoidable Reasons • Escape From
– school ends – people
– job transfer • management
• coworkers
– illness
• customers
– family issues
– working conditions
• Advancement – stress
– more responsibility
• Unmet Expectations
– better pay
– organization
• Unmet Needs – job
– career
45
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Why Are Your Employees


Leaving?
• Exit Interviews

• Attitude Surveys

• Salary Surveys
– pay
– benefits
– time off

46
© 2013 Cengage Learning

The Cost of Turnover


Visible Costs Per Hire
• Advertising charges • Travel Costs
• Agency fees – staff
• Referral bonuses – applicants
• Staff time & benefits • Relocation Costs
– processing applications • Miscellaneous Costs
– interviewing
• Overhead

47
© 2013 Cengage Learning

The Cost of Turnover


Hidden Costs
• Loss of Productivity
– employee leaving
– other employees
– vacant position
– new employee (1 year)
• Inefficiency
• Overtime
• Training Costs

48
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Estimating the Cost of Turnover


• Industry Norms
– rate is 1.4% per month
– cost is 1.5 times salary
• Custom Statistics
– www.advantagehiring.com/calculators/calc_turnover.shtml
– www.uwex.edu/ces/cced/publicat/turn.html

49
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Financial Savings From


Turnover Reduction
• Last Year • This Year
– 5 employees leave – 4 employees leave each
each month (60 per month (48 per year)
year) – Average salary is
– Average salary is $20,000
$20,000 – Cost of turnover is
– Cost of turnover is 48 * $20,000 * 1.5 =
60 * $20,000 * 1.5 = $1,440,000
$1,800,000 – $360,000 saved through
reduced turnover
50
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Reducing Turnover
Compensation Issues
• Match the market

• Use job evaluation to


ensure internal equity

• Offer retention/tenure
bonuses (stay for pay)

51
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Increasing Salary and Benefits


Will only work if:

• Employees are leaving due to


low compensation or benefits
• The turnover rate is high
• The salary increase will be a
meaningful amount

52
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Reducing Turnover
Selection Issues
• Conduct realistic job previews
• Look for person-organization fit
• Study predictors of people who leave

53
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Reducing Turnover
Organizational Issues
• Provide training
• Show appreciation
• Mediate conflicts
• Meet employee needs
– safety
– social
– growth

54
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Strategic Use of Benefits to


Attract and Retain Applicants
• By Providing • You Can Attract/Retain
– Health care for – Gay employees
domestic partners
– Daycare benefits – Dual career families and
parents on public assistance
– Meal benefits – Students and retirees
– Paid time-off – Young people
– Flexible schedules – Homemakers/parents
– Tuition/books – Students
55
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Applied Case Study: Reducing


Turnover at Bubba Gump Shrimp 56
© 2013 Cengage Learning

Focus on Ethics
Organizational Commitment

57
© 2013 Cengage Learning

What Do You Think?


• Do you think that incentives are a form of bribery? If so,
do you think it’s unethical for companies to do this?
• What would keep you at a company for a longer period?
Would incentives such as an Attendance Reward Program
or end of the year bonuses make a difference in whether
you left a job?
• Do you think that using such incentives is a way for
leaders to ignore what they should be doing to make things
better for the employees?
• What are some other ethical dilemmas that might occur by
offering incentives to increase commitment or job
satisfaction?

58

You might also like